Bumblebees are subject to VAT, but honeybees are not.
Bumblebees are subject to VAT, but honeybees are not.
Gov.uk has provided a new tool to check a business’ EORI number. (This used to be an EC resource now not available due to Brexit).
A guide to EORI here
A business may need to demonstrate to HMRC that it has carried out proper due diligence in certain cases.
Contact
If you have queries, or would like to obtain specific EORI advice, contact the HMRC EORI team using the online form
Access
Who has access to an EORI number?
The general public can access limited data, When a business is notified of its EORI number, it will be asked whether it objects to this data being published on the site.
HMRC has published two new sets of guidance for international post users and importing merchandise in baggage. The changes are mainly due to Brexit.
HMRC has published new guidance for international post users.
The notice explains what happens when a business imports or exports goods by post through Royal Mail or Parcelforce Worldwide.
The arrangements set out in the notice do not apply when a full declaration on a single administrative document (SAD – Form C88) is required.
The information about sending a package overseas has been updated. This relates to the new need to compete a customs declaration for goods sent to the EU.
The guidance covers commercial goods (also known as Merchandise in Baggage) which will be used, or sold by a business, where:
A person must declare all commercial goods. There is no duty-free allowance for goods brought into GB to sell or use in a business.
My guide to importing and exporting post Brexit here.
I been asked many times about the VAT position of UK residents buying goods online (and also by more traditional methods) so I thought a brief overview would be helpful.
It has been reported in the media that some overseas retailers have stopped selling to UK customers. This is a commercial decision and is not necessarily solely due to Brexit (although, clearly that hasn’t helped).
What has changed?
Pre Brexit, under the Distance Selling rules, VAT at the rate applicable in the seller’s country would be chargeable by overseas suppliers to UK recipients. This was in the same way as a domestic sale. There were then thresholds which, when breached, resulted in the seller registering in the customer’s country, but these were rarely exceeded by small or SME businesses. The Distance Selling rules still apply to EU Member States, but not the UK.
As the UK is now a ”third country” sales to the UK from the EU which were previously intra-community sales are now imports. From 1 January 2021, sellers of goods B2C (to UK individuals) with a value below £135 – so called low value consignments are required to VAT register in the UK – more details here. Clearly, many businesses are loath to do this hence their refusal to sell to UK customers. This change is not a result of Brexit but was a measure to level the playing field between EU and non-EU supplies (the latter often escaping the tax completely). From 1 July 2021 similar rules will apply to UK businesses selling to individuals in the EU, although there is likely to be a simplification measure; the so-called One Stop Shop (OSS).
Additionally, UK customers are usually responsible for the new post-Brexit import of goods, so there may be unexpected new VAT, duty and courier costs when buying certain goods from EU countries. This is similar to buying goods from any other country in the world.
It would appear that there will be a reduction in cross-border trade (in both directions) with the UK, and that is without factoring in shipping issues and delays at new borders.
Latest from the courts
In the Deluxe Property Holdings Limited High Court case (Deluxe) the issue was whether a VAT claim needed to be passed back to the supplier after a correction – whether the unjust enrichment applied.
Background
Deluxe employed SCL Construction Limited (SCL) to carry out building works. SCL raised invoices in respect of the construction of student accommodation at 20%. It was, however, common ground that the works were in fact zero-rated. SCL recovered the overcharged VAT from HMRC via a VAT Act 1994 Section 80 claim. SCL undertook to repay the amount of VAT to Deluxe via section 10 of VAT Notice 700/45. Without such written reimbursement undertaking, HMRC would have been entitled to refuse the claim. SCL did not make the payment to Deluxe.
Issue
The issue between the parties was whether:
Decision
The court ruled that SCL had undertaken to reimburse its customer all of the amount credited by HMRC without any deduction, for whatever purpose. Further, SCL had undertaken that it could not use the credit for any other purpose. It was a payment made by HMRC for the sole and express purpose of allowing SCL to reimburse the mistakenly charged VAT to Deluxe and was clearly intended to restrict SCL’s freedom of disposal so that the credit was to be exclusively used for the stated purpose without set-off.
Although SCL gave its undertaking to HMRC rather than to Deluxe to pass on the money, it held the repayment on trust for Deluxe and gave rise to a Quistclose Trust*
Additionally, a constructive trust arose because it would be unacceptable for SCL to derive a benefit of the VAT repayment.
The court found that SCL has acted in breach of trust and is liable as trustee to restore the trust fund and transfer to Deluxe the balance of the trust property without offsetting it against amounts that it claimed it was owed by Deluxe.
Commentary
This is a logical and expected decision and the reasoning is helpful for similar disputes.
* A trust may arise where one person, A, advances money to another, B, on the understanding that B is not to have the free disposal of the money and that it may only be applied for the purpose stated by A. The effect of the trust is to reserve in A the beneficial interest in the money, so providing him with some proprietary security for his advance.
TOMS is complex, time consuming, potentially costly and a major headache for tour operators. It does aim to simplify VAT accounting as it avoids businesses having to VAT register in every EU Member State in which it provides services.
But, are there changes ahead? The European Commission has published a Factual summary report which looks at TOMS. The consultation was to gather evidence in order to evaluate the scheme in terms of ;
Since Brexit, HMRC have stated that TOMS still applies in the UK, but supplies in the EU which were previously VATable were now zero rated. The result is that only supplies in the UK are subject to VAT on the margin achieved. The future is unclear however. There is no longer a level playing field between the UK and other EU countries as UK operators’ have an advantage. The potential outcomes(to my mind) are:
The rules of TOMS are not currently fully harmonised and there are variations in the way EU Member States treat non-EU travel companies (such as the UK now). There are also differences in the services which are, and are not, covered by TOMS. Watch this space…
As Brexit is all completely finished * * hollow laugh * * I look at what overseas businesses operating in the UK need to know in respect of compliance.
What is fiscal representation?
It is a safeguard for the authorities responsible for VAT in the EU (and UK). If it is not possible to collect tax from the taxable person, they can go to the representative who is usually jointly and severally responsible for the debt.
Each EU Member State has its own rules on representatives, but here I look at what overseas businesses need to do in the UK, and what the responsibilities are for a business acting in such a role. A representative must meet a set of tests to ensure that it is fit and proper in order for it to be allowed to act in a representative capacity.
In most cases, overseas businesses with no place of belonging in the UK register as a Non-Established Taxable Person (NETP).
Choices
If a business is a NETP, it will have a choice in how it registers and accounts for VAT in the UK (although in certain circumstances, HMRC have the power to direct a business appoint a tax representative).
Deal with UK VAT itself
In most cases an overseas business can deal with VAT without third party assistance. However, it must be able to:
Tax representative
A NETP may appoint a tax representative who:
A NETP is obliged to provide all of the information required to fulfil its obligations.
Tax Agent
A NETP may appoint a tax agent to act on its behalf. Such an arrangement will be subject to whatever contractual agreement the NETP and the agent decide. The significant difference to a tax representative is that HMRC cannot hold the agent responsible for any of the NETP’s VAT debts. This is clearly a better position for a UK business acting on behalf of a NETP. HMRC can decide not to deal with any particular agent appointed. Also, in some circumstances, if HMRC think it is necessary, it may still insist that a tax representative is appointed – this is usually in cases where there is a risk to the revenue. Additionally, HMRC can ask for a financial security.
As with the appointment of tax representatives a NETP:
It is possible to appoint an employee to act as a VAT agent.
Penalties
As is to be expected, get any of the above wrong and there are penalties!
A brief guide to the Capital Goods Scheme (CGS)
If a business acquires or creates a capital asset it may be required to adjust the amount of VAT it reclaims. This mechanism is called the CGS and it requires a business to spread the initial input tax claimed over a number of years. If a business’ taxable use of the asset increases it is permitted to reclaim more of the original VAT and if the proportion of the taxable supplies decreases it will be required to repay some of the input tax initially claimed. The use of the CGS is mandatory.
How the CGS works
Normally, VAT recovery is based on the initial use of an asset at the time of purchase (a one-off claim). The CGS works by applying a longer period during which the initial recovery may be adjusted if there are changes in the use of the asset. Practically, the CGS will only apply in situations where there is exempt or non-business use of the asset. A business using an asset for fully taxable purposes will be covered by the scheme, but it is likely that full recovery up front will be possible with no subsequent adjustments required. This will be the position if, say, a standard rated property is purchased, the option to tax taken, and the building let to a third party. The CGS looks at how capital items have been used in the business over a number of intervals (usually, but not always; years). It adjusts both for taxable versus exempt use and for business versus non business use over the lifetime of the asset. Example; a business buys a yacht that is hired out (business use) and it is also used privately by a director (non-business use). However, a more common example is a business buying a property and occupying it while its trade includes making some exempt supplies.
Which businesses does it affect?
Purchasers of certain commercial property, owners of property who carry out significant refurbishment or carry out civil engineering work, purchasers of computer hardware, aircraft, ships, and other vessels over a certain monetary value who incur VAT on the cost. (As the CGS considers the recovery of input tax, only VAT bearing assets are covered by it).
Assets not covered by the scheme
The CGS does not apply if a business;
Limits for capital goods
Included in the CGS are:
Assets below these (net of VAT) limits are excluded from the CGS.
The adjustment periods
Changes in your business circumstances
Certain changes to a business during a CGS period will impact on the treatment of its capital assets. These changes include:
Specific advice should be sought in these circumstances.
Examples
Danger areas
Summary
There is a lot of misunderstanding about the CGS and in certain circumstances it can produce complexity and increased record keeping requirements. There are also a lot of situations where overlooking the impact of the CGS or applying the rules incorrectly can be very costly. However, it does produce a fairer result than a once and for all claim, and when its subtleties are understood, it quite often provides a helpful planning tool.