Category Archives: Contract

A CASC is not a charity for VAT – The Eynsham Cricket Club case

By   2 March 2021
0

Latest from the courts

In the Court of Appeal (CoA) case of Eynsham Cricket Club (ECC) the issue is whether a Community Amateur Sport Club (CASC) is able to take advantage of VAT reliefs in the same way as a charity.

Background

The question was whether supplies of construction services of building a new cricket pavilion for a CASC qualify for zero-rating via The VAT Act 1994, Schedule 8. Group 5, item 2 (a) “The supply in the course of the construction of a building designed as a dwelling or number of dwellings or intended for use solely for a relevant residential purpose or a relevant charitable purpose…”Emphasis added.

The outcome depended on whether ECC was a charity. That in turn depends on whether:

  • ECC was “established for charitable purposes only” pursuant to Schedule 6 to the Finance Act 2010
  • Section 6 of the Charities Act 2011 applied and had the effect of preventing ECC from being treated as “established for charitable purposes”
  • ECC satisfied the other conditions, and in particular, the “registration condition”

Decision

It was determined that CASCs cannot be treated as charities for VAT purposes as the above criteria were not met. Therefore, the construction of ECC’s new pavilion did not qualify for zero-rating and was standard rated. It was noted that becoming a CASC meant that certain charitable benefits were forgone in return for relief for certain administrative and management chores.

Commentary

It appears that ECC had the opportunity to register as a charity, but apparently, unlike a near neighbour cricket club, decided not to.

“Charity” is not defined in VAT legislation, so this case is a reminder that it should not be assumed that every entity which may have charitable objectives, or generally exist in order to benefit a section of the community qualifies as a charity for the tax.

VAT: Uber Supreme Court case

By   23 February 2021
0

Latest from the courts

As many would have heard, the Supreme Court has ruled that individuals driving taxis are “workers” rather than third party contractors. Although not a VAT case, it has This decision has highlighted a number of VAT issues.

Agent versus principal

The main matter in VAT terms is; which party is making the supply? This is often a point of dispute with HMRC, especially with taxi businesses, driving schools, the operation of online platforms, travel and accommodation, and many other types of businesses. It is one of the most common areas of disagreement as many cases have demonstrated, eg; here, here, here, and here.

The difference

VAT legislation does not define agency for the purposes of the tax.

As is often the case in these types of arrangements, there are some matters that point towards a business acting as agent, and others indicating that the proper VAT treatment is that of principal. The important difference, of course, being whether output tax is due on the “commission” received by an agent (20% in Uber’s case), or on the full payment made to it by the end user.

Uber contended that the drivers were independent contractors who work under contracts made directly with the customers and are not employees. Thus, they (Uber) acted as agent. One main argument advanced by them was that the drivers were free to work for other businesses (although in reality this was very unlikely due to the market share held by Uber).

Contract

It also demonstrates both the importance of a contract (or lack of one in Uber’s case), and how all parties act in relation to it. There have been many VAT cases on how much weight should be given to a written agreement versus what the relevant parties actually agree, how they act, how the services are performed and what the customer thinks is the position (who [s]he thinks is providing the service).

Decision

Finding that the drivers work for, and under contracts with, Uber, the following aspects supported its decision – Uber sets the fare, the terms are set by Uber and drivers have no input, Uber restricts communications between driver and passenger, and Uber exercises significant control over the way in which the services are delivered.

Update

A similar decision has been made in the Dutch courts in the Deliveroo case.

Next steps

Commentary

We wait to hear how HMRC will proceed as a result of this case. There is a chance that it may attack taxi firms which they have previously accepted as agent on the grounds that they are principals – providing the service via their ‘employees/workers” and so assessing output tax on the full value of the fare paid.

VAT: Domestic Reverse Charge for construction services from 1 March 2021

By   17 February 2021
0

A reminder

The twice delayed introduction of the Domestic Reverse Charge (DRC) for the construction industry will be introduced from the first of next month and affected businesses need to have the necessary procedures in place – as it won’t be deferred again.!

Details of the scheme here and here.

Please contact us if you have any queries.

VAT: Fiscal representation in the UK

By   12 January 2021
0

As Brexit is all completely finished * * hollow laugh * * I look at what overseas businesses operating in the UK need to know in respect of compliance.

What is fiscal representation?

It is a safeguard for the authorities responsible for VAT in the EU (and UK). If it is not possible to collect tax from the taxable person, they can go to the representative who is usually jointly and severally responsible for the debt.

Each EU Member State has its own rules on representatives, but here I look at what overseas businesses need to do in the UK, and what the responsibilities are for a business acting in such a role. A representative must meet a set of tests to ensure that it is fit and proper in order for it to be allowed to act in a representative capacity.

In most cases, overseas businesses with no place of belonging in the UK register as a Non-Established Taxable Person (NETP).

Choices

If a business is a NETP, it will have a choice in how it registers and accounts for VAT in the UK (although in certain circumstances, HMRC have the power to direct a business appoint a tax representative).

Deal with UK VAT itself

In most cases an overseas business can deal with VAT without third party assistance. However, it must be able to:

  • register for VAT at the correct time
  • keep a record of everything it buys and sells in the UK
  • keep all the records needed to complete its VAT Return
  • produce records and accounts to HMRC for inspection
  • keep a note of all VAT paid and charged for each period covered by the return
  • pay the right amount of tax on time

Tax representative

A NETP may appoint a tax representative who:

  • must keep its principal’s VAT records and accounts and account for UK VAT on its behalf
  • is jointly and severally liable for any VAT debts the NETP incurs

A NETP is obliged to provide all of the information required to fulfil its obligations.

Tax Agent

A NETP may appoint a tax agent to act on its behalf. Such an arrangement will be subject to whatever contractual agreement the NETP and the agent decide. The significant difference to a tax representative is that HMRC cannot hold the agent responsible for any of the NETP’s VAT debts. This is clearly a better position for a UK business acting on behalf of a NETP. HMRC can decide not to deal with any particular agent appointed. Also, in some circumstances, if HMRC think it is necessary, it may still insist that a tax representative is appointed – this is usually in cases where there is a risk to the revenue. Additionally, HMRC can ask for a financial security.

As with the appointment of tax representatives a NETP:

  • may only appoint one person at a time to act as its agent (although an agent may act for more than one principal)
  • must still complete the appropriate form to apply for registration
  • HMRC require a NETP’s authority before it can deal with an agent
  • Needs to give the agent enough information to allow them to keep the VAT account, make returns and pay VAT

It is possible to appoint an employee to act as a VAT agent.

Penalties

As is to be expected, get any of the above wrong and there are penalties!

VAT: Is the supply of football pitches an exempt right over land? The Netbusters case.

By   11 November 2020
0

Latest from the courts.

In the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) case of Netbusters (UK) Limited the issue was whether the supply was the standard rated provision of sporting facilities, or an exempt right over land.

Background

Netbusters organised football and netball leagues and provided the playing facilities (artificial pitches for football and courts for netball). The hire of the facilities was for a defined period of time and no other party had the right to access the pitches during those times. The hire could be a block, or one-off booking. The appellant contended that the supplies were exempt via VAT Act 1994, Sch 9, Group 1 – “The grant of any interest in or right over land or of any licence to occupy land…”  However, item 1 Note (para m) excludes the “the grant of facilities for playing any sport or participating in any physical recreation” in which case they become standard rated. To add complexity, Note 16 overrides the exception for sporting facilities (so they are exempt) if the grant of the facilities is for:

“(a) a continuous period of use exceeding 24 hours; or

(b) a series of 10 or more periods, whether or not exceeding 24 hours in total, where the following conditions are satisfied—

(i) each period is in respect of the same activity carried on at the same place;

(ii) the interval between each period is not less than one day and not more than 14 days;

(iii) consideration is payable by reference to the whole series and is evidenced by written agreement;

(iv) the grantee has exclusive use of the facilities; and

(v) the grantee is a school, a club, an association or an organisation representing affiliated clubs or constituent associations.”

I have a simplified flowchart which may assist if you, or your clients, need to look at these types of supplies further.

Another issue was whether Netbusters’ league/tournament management services which were, in principle, available independently of pitch hire, but in practice rarely were provided in that way, were separate supplies or composite. There was a single price payable for both pitch hire and league management services.

The appellant contended that its supplies were exempt via VAT Act 1994, Sch 9, Group 1 or that Revenue and Customs Brief 8 (2014): sports leagues, is applicable which states “HMRC accepts that the decision of the FTT is applicable to all traders who operate in circumstances akin to Goals Soccer Centres plc. This includes traders who hire the pitches from third parties such as local authorities, schools and clubs…”

HMRC argued that there was no intention to create a tenancy and the agreements between the parties did not provide for exclusive use of the premises, so the supplies fell to be standard rated.

Decision

The appeal was allowed; the supply was a singe exempt supply because the objective character of the supplies were properly categorised as the granting of interests in, rights over or licenses to occupy land. It was found to be significant Netbusters (or its customers) had the ability to exclude others from the pitches during the period of the matches.

It was therefore unnecessary to consider whether Netbusters’ supplies grants of facilities satisfy all the conditions set out in Note 16 (although the FTT were disinclined to do this anyway as a consequence of the way respondent prepared its case).

Commentary

The issue of the nature sporting rights has a long and acrimonious history both in the UK and EU courts. Any business providing similar services are advised to review the VAT treatment applied.

VAT: Transfers of going concerns (TOGCs): additional condition

By   21 September 2020
0

Reallocation of VAT registration number (VAT 68 action) conditions of reallocation

When a business is transferred as a going concern it is possible for the transferee to take the VAT registration number of the transferor. We do no generally advise such an action as the transferee inherits any VAT “issues” of the transferor, but there may be occasions where it is desirable.

Details of TOGCs including the conditions here.

The additional new condition for the reallocation of the VAT number in a TOGC is that the transferor may not have a VAT debt.

Details of VAT 68

  • the transferee must complete the form if it wants to keep the registration number of the previous owner. The transferee must also complete a form VAT 1. The previous owner must not complete a form VAT 7 to deregister
  • once the transfer of the registration number has been allowed, it cannot be revoked
  • the conditions that the new and previous owners must agree to are set out on the application form and are legally binding. This means that the transferee will be liable for any outstanding VAT from the previous owner’s registration. The transferor will no longer be entitled to any repayments of VAT or unclaimed input tax, even if these amounts refer to periods before or after the transfer
  • the previous owner must cancel any Direct Debit that they have set up to pay their VAT

Full conditions

The following conditions should be met as both a matter of law before reallocation can be allowed.

  • a TOGC must have taken place
  • a VAT 68 must have been completed correctly by all parties
  • the transferor must not have already deregistered
  • the transferee must not already be registered
  • where the transferor is a corporate body, it must not have been dissolved before the VAT 68 was signed
  • a group registration must not be involved
  • the transferor must be neither liable nor eligible to remain VAT-registered following the transfer
  • the transferor must not be the subject of a Notice of Direction in respect of disaggregation.
  • the transferor must have no VAT debt. This includes amounts declared (both due or not yet due), penalties and other applied charges – the new condition
  • any assessment notified to the transferor covering periods before the date of transfer must be paid
  • any assessment raised, or due to be assessed, against the transferor, or any voluntary disclosure made by the transferor, must be paid with no indication of an appeal
  • any penalty incurred by the transferor for periods prior to the date of transfer must have been paid, with no indication of an appeal
  • any interest incurred by the transferor for periods prior to the date of transfer must have been paid with no indication of an appeal
  • no civil penalty has been or is intended to be imposed on the transferor

HMRC internal guidance on this matter VATREG30100 here

VAT: Changes to early termination fees and compensation payments

By   10 September 2020
0

HMRC has announced changes to the treatment of “compensation” and similar payments in its Revenue and Customs Brief 12 (2020).

This is as a result of recent judgments of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU), specifically Meo (C-295/17) and Vodafone Portugal (C-43/19).

Background

Previous HMRC guidance stated that when customers are charged to withdraw from agreements to receive goods or services, these charges were not generally for a supply and were outside the scope of VAT; being compensatory in nature.

New treatment

Now, as a result of the CJEU cases, it is apparent that such charges are considered as being payment for the supply of goods or services for which the customer originally contracted. Consequently, most early termination and cancellation fees are standard rated. HMRC comment that this is the case even if they are described as compensation or damages (which, if an accurate description, remain VAT free). An example of this is given as; charges made when exiting one contract and entering into another to upgrade a mobile telephone package or handset.

Action

Any businesses which have not accounted for output tax on receipt of these payments are required to amend past declarations.

Commentary

The retrospective nature of this announcement seems unfair and is likely to cause administrative problems for a lot of businesses. The other issue is that HMRC have not said how far back such adjustments apply, is it: The usual four-year cap? The earlier of the two EJEU cases mentioned (2018)? The June 2020 Vodafone case? Some other date?

It does not appear that the relevant date will be the date of issue of the changes – 2 September 2020 as HMRC say that this date will only apply to certain businesses (those that have received a specific written ruling) so where does that leave the majority of other taxpayers? HMRC remain silent on this and it does not help those affected at all. It is possible that retrospection may be challengeable via judicial review.

While the application of the new rules seems logical and consistent with case law, the implementation and lack of detail is really, to be polite, unhelpful.

VAT Self-billing. What is it? The pros and cons

By   7 September 2020
0

Self-billing is an arrangement between a supplier and a customer. Both customer and supplier must be VAT registered.  Rather than the supplier issuing a tax invoice in the normal way, the recipient of the supply raises a self-billing document. The customer prepares the supplier’s invoice and forwards a copy to the supplier with the payment.

If a business wants to put a self-billing arrangement in place it does not have to tell HMRC or get approval from them, but it does have to get its supplier or customer to agree to the arrangement and meet certain conditions.

The main advantage of self-billing is that it usually makes invoicing easier if the customer (rather than the supplier) determines the value of the purchase after the goods have been delivered or the services supplied.  This could apply more in certain areas such as; royalties, the construction industry, Feed-In-Tariff, and scrap metal.  A further benefit is that accounting staff will be working with uniform purchase documentation.

However, there is a high risk of errors, significant confusion and audit trail weaknesses. The wrong rate of VAT may easily be applied, documents can go missing, invoices may be raised as well as self-billing documents, the conditions for using self-billing may easily be breached (a common example is a supplier deregistering from VAT) and essential communication between the parties can be overlooked.  As the Tribunal chairman in UDL Construction Plc observed: “I regard the self-billing procedure as a gross violation of the integrity of the VAT system. It permits a customer to originate a document which enables him to recover input tax and obliges his supplier to account for output tax. It goes without saying that such a dangerous procedure should be strictly controlled and policed.”

The rules

For the customer

You can set up self-billing arrangements with your suppliers as long as you can meet certain conditions, you’ll need to:

  • Enter into an agreement with each supplier
  • Review agreements with suppliers at regular intervals
  • Keep records of each of the suppliers who let you self-bill them
  • Make sure invoices contain the right information and are correctly issued. This means including all of the details that make up a full VAT invoice – details here

If a supplier stops being registered for VAT then you can continue to self-bill them, but you can’t issue them with VAT invoices (and you cannot claim any input tax). Your self-billing arrangement with that supplier is no longer covered by the VAT regulations.

The Agreement

A self-billing arrangement is only valid if your supplier agrees to put one in place. If you don’t have an agreement with your supplier your self-billed invoices won’t be valid VAT invoices – and you won’t be able to reclaim the input tax shown on them.

You’ll both need to sign a formal self-billing agreement. This is a legally binding document. The agreement must contain:

  • Your supplier’s agreement that you, as the self-biller, can issue invoices on your supplier’s behalf
  • Your supplier’s confirmation that they won’t issue VAT invoices for goods or services covered by the agreement
  • An expiry date – usually for 12 months’ time but it could be the date that any business contract you have with your supplier ends
  • Your supplier’s agreement that they’ll let you know if they stop being registered for VAT, get a new VAT registration number or transfer their business as a going concern
  • Details of any third party you intend to outsource the self-billing process to.

An example of an agreement here

Reviewing self-billing agreements

Self-billing agreements usually last for 12 months. At the end of this you’ll need to review the agreement to make sure you can prove to HMRC that your supplier agrees to accept the self-billing invoices you issue on their behalf. It’s very important that you don’t self-bill a supplier when you don’t have their written agreement to do so.

Records

If you are a self-biller you’ll need to keep certain additional records:

  • Copies of the agreements you make with your suppliers
  • The names, addresses and VAT registration numbers of the suppliers who have agreed that you can self-bill them

If you don’t keep the required records, then the self-billed invoices you issue won’t be proper VAT invoices.

Invoices

Once a self-billing agreement is in place with a supplier, you must issue self-billed invoices for all the transactions with them during the period of the agreement.

As well as all the details that must go on a full VAT invoice you will also need to include your supplier’s:

  • name
  • address
  • VAT registration number

All self-billed invoices must include the statement “The VAT shown is your output tax due to HMRC” and you must clearly mark each self-billed invoice you raise with the reference: ‘Self Billing’ (This rule has the force of law).   Details required on invoice here

Input tax

You’ll only be able to reclaim the input tax shown on self-billed invoices if you meet all the record keeping requirements.  When you can reclaim the input tax depends on the date when the supply of the goods or services takes place for VAT purposes.  This is known as the the tax point, details here

For the supplier

If one of your customers wants to set up a self-billing arrangement with you, they will be required to agree to this with you in writing. If you agree, they’ll give you a self-billing agreement to sign.

The terms of the agreement are a matter between you and your customer, but there are certain conditions you’ll both have to meet to make sure you comply with VAT regulations:

  • Sign and keep a copy of the self-billing agreement
  • Agree not to issue any sales invoices to your customer for any transaction during the period of the agreement
  • Agree to accept the self-billing invoices that your customer issues
  • Tell your customer at once if you change your VAT registration number, deregister from VAT, or transfer your business as a going concern.

Accounting for output tax

The VAT figure on the self-billed invoice your customer sends you is your output tax.

You are accountable to HMRC for output tax on the supplies you make to your customer, so you should check that your customer is applying the correct rate of VAT on the invoices they send you. If there has been a VAT rate change, you will need to check that the correct rate has been used.

Tips

  • As a supplier, take care not to treat self-billed invoices as purchase invoices and reclaim the VAT shown as input tax
  • As a customer, carry out an instant check of VAT registration numbers here
  • As a supplier or customer regularly check that the conditions for self-billing continue to be met and ensure good communications
  • As a supplier or customer ensure that the documentation accurately reflects the relevant transactions and the correct VAT rate is applied
  • As a supplier or customer ensure that there is a clear audit trial and that all documentation is available for HMRC inspection
  • It is possible to use self-billing cross-border intra-EC, but additional rules apply.

VAT: New HMRC policy papers on tax debt

By   25 August 2020
0

HMRC has published two new policy papers covering their position on VAT debts.

The first covers HMRC’s approach to tax debt and covers:

  • contact and discussion on ways to settle debt
  • tailored support offered
  • the role of agents/supporters
  • general debt advice
  • actions against taxpayers who do not engage with HMRC, or refuse to pay
  • HMRC enforcement powers
  • removal of assets
  • recovery of debt directly from a taxpayer’s bank account
  • County Court proceedings
  • use of debt collection agencies

The second provides guidance on HMRC’s support for taxpayers with tax debt and includes:

  • contact with HMRC
  • ways in which HMRC can assist
  • payments options, including Time To Pay (TTP)
  • bespoke TTP arrangements
  • how affordable payments are calculated
  • the role of honesty
  • the use of the Citizens Advice Bureau
  • treatment of assets
  • expectations of first contact with HMRC
  • what happens after a time to pay arrangement has been agreed
  • enforcement powers

Interestingly (well, it is all relevant I suppose!) HMRC say that it typically has more than half a million TTP arrangements in place at any one time, and nine out of ten are completed successfully.

Planning

There are a number of schemes and methods to legitimately defer or reduce VAT payable. These include the Flat Rate Scheme, Cash Accounting, margin schemes, global accounting. Other basic planning may involve; tax point planning, invoice timing, ad use of Bad Debt Relief (BDR).

Advice

Our advice is always to contact HMRC as soon as possible if a business has tax payment problems. In some cases, the department is surprisingly helpful. As the statistics demonstrate TTP arrangements are, on the whole, a very successful method for both sides to deal with tax debt.

Reminders

  • if HMRC has no idea of the cause of debt, and no contact has been made by the taxpayer. the usual assumption is that the taxpayer is ignoring it and the full force of debt action usually follows
  • tax debt never goes out of time, as there is no statute bar
  • paying taxes late usually results in penalties but these may be avoided if a TTP agreement is in place at the appropriate time
  • A TTP agreement usually means that HMRC will not use its enforcement powers
  • the length of TTP agreements depend on the quantum and nature of the debt, however for VAT unlikely to be beyond 12 months

These policy papers provide helpful guidance and explanation of HMRC’s approach, especially in these difficult economic times as a result of COVID 19 and Brexit.

VAT: Staff costs – The San Domenico Vetraria SpA case

By   24 August 2020
0

Latest from the courts

In the San Domenico Vetraria SpA CJEU case the issue was the treatment of the secondment of staff by an Italian parent company to its subsidiary and the reimbursement by the subsidiary company of the costs incurred. Was there a VAtable supply?

Background

The issue was whether the relevant payment represented a supply of services ‘for consideration’. The parent company seconded one of its directors to its subsidiary and a charge was made based solely on a reimbursement of actual costs. The Italian domestic court ruled that the transaction was outside the scope of VAT on the basis that there was no consideration paid or received and therefore no supply of services.

Decision

The court ruled that despite the fact that the value of the payment to the parent company was limited to the parent company’s costs this did not mean that consideration for the director’s secondment was absent. Therefore, as consideration flowed in both directions, a taxable supply took place such that VAT was due, the claim of input tax made by the subsidiary was correct and the Italian authorities were incorrect to deny credit for it.

The President of the Chamber stated in the ruling that “The amount of the consideration, in particular the fact that it is equal to, greater or less than, the costs which the taxable person incurred in providing his service, is irrelevant in that regard”. It was immaterial that no profit was made, and the absence of such profit did not affect the VAT treatment.

There was a legal relationship between the provider of the service and the recipient pursuant to which there is reciprocal performance, the remuneration received by the provider of the service constituting the value actually given in return for the service supplied to the recipient.

Commentary

This is a useful clarification/confirmation. The supply was not a disbursement (details here) so it was a supply by the parent company. More on inter-company charges here.

Planning

If the recipient company was partly exempt or unable to reclaim the input tax for any reason, the VAT would have represented a real cost. So, would there be a way to avoid this charge? The answer (in the UK at least) is yes. If the director had a joint contract of employment with both companies, there would be no supply. Also, if the two companies were part of the same VAT group, the “supply” would be disregarded, so there would be no VAT cost for the subsidiary.