Category Archives: HMRC Publications

VAT: Bad Debt Relief – The Total case

By Marcus Ward 1 July 2019

Latest from the courts

Bad Debt Relief (BDR) is often an area that creates disputes with HMRC. The legislation has changed over the years and the current rules are described here.

Background

Broadly speaking, under normal VAT rules, a supplier is required to account for output tax, even if the supply has not been paid for (however, the use of cash accounting or certain retail schemes removes the problem of VAT on bad debts from the supplier). BDR, as the names suggests, is intended to provide relief on the VAT element of a bad debt. Output tax previously claimed may be “reclaimed” by using the BDR mechanism.

The law which governs the claiming of bad debt relief is The VAT Act 1994, Section 36, and Section 26A which covers the repayment of input tax when a customer fails to pay for supplies received within six months of the relevant date, and The VAT Regulations 1995, Parts XIX, XIXA and XIXB.

Conditions for claiming bad debt relief

A business must have accounted for the VAT on the supplies and paid it to HMRC
It must have been written off the debt in its day to day VAT accounts and transferred it to a separate bad debt account
The value of the supply must not be more than the customary selling price
The debt must not have been paid, sold or factored under a valid legal assignment
The debt must have remained unpaid for a period of six months after the date of the supply

The case

In the First Tier Tribunal (FTT) case of Total Catering Equipment Ltd [2019] TC 07184, heard on 4 June 2019, the issue was whether payments from customers which were diverted by a dishonest employee should be recognised as a payment for a supply of goods (no BDR available as the money was received then stolen) or whether the fact that the business did not actually receive the payment meant that a BDR was appropriate. Total supplied goods to customers, some of whom paid by credit or debit cards. The member of staff responsible for these transactions, set up a separate (from the business) bank account and fraudulently diverted customers; payments into his own account. A BDR claim was made by the appellant when the crime was discovered. The claim was refused by HMRC on the grounds that the employee had received payment “on behalf” of Total before making payment into his own account.

Decision

The judge found for the appellant. The appeal was allowed – it was decided that Total had never actually received payment for the goods supplied, so BDR was available. A distinction was made between the diversion of monies in this case (where the supplier was deemed to never had received the money) and a theft by an employee from, eg; a till or subsequent withdrawals from the business’ bank account (where a business would have received payment before the money was stolen).

Commentary

I have written about VAT and illegal activities here. There can be a fine line between taxable illegal activities and non-taxable illegal activities, and subtleties around tax points (time of supply) misrepresentation and consideration. If you, or your clients have been in the unfortunate position of being on the receiving end of crime, it would be adding insult to injury to have to account for tax on money you do not have. I would always advise that any demands from HMRC, or refusals to refund VAT should be properly reviewed.

VAT: The transport of disabled persons

By Marcus Ward 24 June 2019

HMRC have released Revenue and Customs Brief 3 (2019) RCB3 2019 which sets out the treatment of certain transport services, specifically in relation to the Jigsaw Medical Services Upper Tribunal (UT) case. This case considered emergency ambulance services contrasted with patient transport services. It was accepted that they were exempt (“the supply of transport services for sick or injured persons in vehicles specially designed for that purpose” – VAT Act 1994, Schedule 9, Group 7, item 11) but could they “also” be treated as zero rated?

Technical

Zero rating takes precedence over exemption, so if these services qualify for both exemption and zero rating, they will be treated as zero rated. Although both treatments are VAT free, zero rating is beneficial as it provides the suppler the ability to recover input tax attributable to the supplies.

Summary

The Brief clarifies that zero rating applies if the supply of transport is in any vehicle with seating to carry ten or more passengers (including the driver) or if there would be 10 seats if wheelchair adaptations were removed. If the supply is not zero rated, say, because of the number of seats test is failed, the above exemption may apply if the service is the transport of sick or injured persons. If that exemption does not apply, then the default position applies, and the service is standard rated. RCB3 also provides information on how to apply the “ten seat rule” and on adapted vehicles.

VAT: Brexit – Intending Trader registration for overseas businesses

By Marcus Ward 14 June 2019

With the continuing uncertainty over a No-Deal Brexit, which appears to be a more likely prospect given recent political events, HMRC has made a statement on the process of registering non-UK EU businesses as intending traders in the UK.

Background

What is an intending trader?

An intending trader is a person who, on the date of the registration request:

is carrying on a business
has not started making taxable supplies
has an intention to make taxable supplies in the future

If the business satisfies HMRC of its intention, HMRC must VAT register it. VAT Act 1994, Schedule 1, 9 (b). It is, in some cases, difficult to convince that there is a genuine intention to make taxable supplies. This often comes down to documentary evidence.

Why do overseas businesses need to register as intending traders?

In the event of a No-deal Brexit, it is assumed that the EU VAT simplification that relieves the current obligation to be registered in the UK will no longer available. As a consequence, the EU supplier will itself become responsible for accounting for VAT on sales deemed to be made in the UK. In order to do this, the business will require a UK VAT registration. As the simplification is in place until Brexit, the registration will be required the very day after the UK leaves the EU – currently 1 November 2019.

Therefore, many EU businesses have applied for UK VAT registration as intending traders. That is, they do not currently make supplies, but intend to in the future (from 1 November 2109).

The issue

The Chartered Institute of Taxation has reported that businesses applying for intending trader registrations are experiencing difficulties with the process.

In response, HMRC have stated:

“Businesses in the position you have described can register for VAT using the Advanced Notification facility, by registering online requesting a voluntary registration from an advanced date of 1 November 2019. In the ‘business activity’ section they should enter trade class/SIC code 99000 European Community. In the free text box they should describe accurately what the business does and ensure there is a positive amount entered in the ‘taxable turnover in the next 12 months’ box. If this is not done the application will be rejected. This information will enable the VAT Registration Team (VRT) to identify and actively manage any registration that is conditional on the UK leaving the EU without a deal.

If there is a change to the date of withdrawal from the EU, the VRT will amend the Advanced Notification date to match this new date. If the UK enters a transitional period or agrees a deal with the EU that allows current arrangements to continue then the registration will be cancelled. The approval of an Advanced Notification registration in these circumstances is only made as a contingency for the UK leaving the EU without a deal and the VAT number may not be used unless that happens. The business will receive an automated notification of an Advanced Notification VAT Registration and the VRT may follow this up with a manual letter to further explain the conditions and both.

With the UK having agreed an extension to the date of withdrawal from the EU, we would not expect businesses to use this facility until closer to the 1st November.”

It is clearly prudent for overseas businesses which make certain supplies in the UK to properly prepare for a No-Deal Brexit. However, experience insists that many have not identified or made provisions for this outcome.

We are able to assist and advise other EU Member State businesses on this process.

VAT: Domestic reverse charge for building services – Latest

By Marcus Ward 12 June 2019

The new domestic reverse charge for building and construction services will be introduced on 1 October 2019. Details here

HMRC have now published comprehensive guidance which appears to cover all scenarios (but almost certainly there will be transactions which will produce disputes).

Brief Overview

The domestic reverse charge is a major change to the way VAT is collected in the building and construction industry.

It means the customer receiving the service will have to pay VAT to HMRC instead of paying the supplier.

It will only apply to individuals or businesses registered for VAT in the UK.

This will affect a business if it supplies specified services reported under the Construction Industry Scheme (CIS). A business will need to prepare for the change by:

checking whether the reverse charge affects either sales, purchases or both
informing regular clients or suppliers
ensuring a business’ accounting systems and software are updated to deal with the reverse charge
considering whether the change will have an impact on cashflow

The reverse charge does not apply if the service is zero rated or if the customer is not registered for VAT in the UK. It also does not apply to services which are supplied to end users or intermediaries connected with end users. More details here.

Please contact us if you have any queries.

VAT: When is the building of a house complete? (And why is it important?)

By Marcus Ward 11 June 2019

Completion of a residential dwelling

A technical point which comes up surprisingly often and seems innocuous is: when is a building “complete”? The following case is helpful, and I thank Les Howard for bringing it to my attention.

The date that the construction of a dwelling is deemed to be complete is important for a number of reasons. The issue in the case of Mr and Mrs James was whether certain works could be zero rated via the VAT Act Schedule 8 Group 5 Item 2 (The supply in the course of the construction of a building designed as a dwelling…) or as HMRC contended, they were the reconstruction or alteration of an existing building and the work should be standard rated.

Background

The James used a contractor to plaster the entire interior of their house in the course of its construction. However, the work was demonstrably defective to such an extent that the James commenced legal proceedings. A surveyor advised that all of the old plaster needed to be hacked off and replaced by new plastering installed by a new firm. The stripping out and replacement works took place after the Certificate of Completion had been issued.

The James claimed input tax on the house construction via the DIY Housebuilders’ Scheme.

Technical

HMRC refused the James’ claim to have the remedial work zero-rated because, in their view, the re-plastering works amounted to the reconstruction or alteration of the house which was, when the supplies were made, an “existing building”. They proffered Note 16 of Schedule 5 which provides that “the construction of a building” does not include “(a) … the conversion, reconstruction or alteration of an existing building”.

They stated that zero-rating only applied if the work formed part of the construction of a zero-rated building. They had previously decided that the work of snagging or correction of faults carried out after the building had been completed could only be zero-rated if it was carried out by the original contractors and correction of faults formed part of the building contract. When the snagging is carried out by a different contractor, the work is to an existing building and does not qualify for zero rating.

The James stated that the Customs’ guidelines on snagging do not take into account extraordinary circumstances. Their contention was that the re-plastering works were zero rated because they had no choice but to engage the services of a different contractor other than the one who carried out the original works.

Decision

The judge found for the appellant – the re-plastering works were zero rated.

There was a query as to why The James applied for a Certificate of Completion before the plastering was completed. In nearly all cases such a certificate would crystallise the date the building was complete.

The reasons were given as:

the need for funds. The James could not remortgage the house without the certificate and they needed to borrow a substantial amount
they could not reclaim VAT under the DIY Housebuilders’ Scheme until the Certificate of Completion had been issued
they were aware that the building inspector was beginning to wonder why the building works were taking such a long time
they needed the house assessed for Council Tax which could only happen when the certificate had been issued
the Certificate was issued as part of the procedure required by the Building Act 1984 and the Building Regulations of 2000

These reasons were accepted by the judge.

Despite the respondents stating that:

for the reasons given above
the fact that the James had been living in the house for some time
they had obtained the Certificate of Completion
the new plastering work had been done by the new plasterer such that the house had been constructed before supply of the new plasterer’s services had been made
the house was an “existing building”

the judge was satisfied that in the circumstances the new plastering work was supplied in the course of the construction of the building as a dwelling house and that there was no reconstruction or alteration of an existing building in the sense contemplated by Note (16) to Group 5 Schedule 8.

He observed that the Certificate of Completion records that the substantive requirements of the Building Regulations have been satisfied. But to the naked eye the old plasterwork was obviously inadequate and dangerous ad he could not possibly consider that the construction project had finished until the new plasterwork was installed. The James’ construction project was to build a new dwelling house. Plasterwork of an acceptable standard was an integral part of the construction works. The new plasterwork was done at the earliest practicable opportunity.

Commentary

Care should be taken when considering when the completion of a house build takes place. There are time limits for DIY Housebuilders’ Scheme clams and clearly, as this case illustrates, usually work done to a house after completion does not qualify for zero rating. So, if the owner of a house is thinking of, say, building a conservatory for example, it is more prudent in VAT terms to construct it at the same time as a new house is built, and certainly before completion.

I would say that the appellant in this case achieved a surprisingly good result.

VAT: What is a TOGC? Why is it important?

By Marcus Ward 6 June 2019

What is a Transfer of a Going Concern (TOGC)?

Normally the sale of the assets of a VAT registered business will be subject to VAT at the appropriate rate. A TOGC, however is the sale of a business including assets which must be treated as a matter of law, as “neither a supply of goods nor a supply of services” by virtue of meeting certain conditions. It is always the seller who is responsible for applying the correct VAT treatment and will be required to support their decision.

Where the sale meets the conditions, the supply is outside the scope of VAT and therefore VAT is not chargeable.

The word ‘business’ has the meaning set out in The VAT Act 1994, section 94 and ‘going concern’ has the meaning that at the point in time to which the description applies, the business is live or operating and has all parts and features necessary to keep it in operation, as distinct from its being only an inert aggregation of assets.

TOGC Conditions

The conditions for VAT free treatment of a TOGC:

The assets must be sold as a business, or part of a business, as a going concern
The assets must be used by the transferee in carrying on the same kind of business, whether or not as part of any existing business, as that carried on by the transferor in relation to that part (HMRC guidance uses the words “intend to use…” which, in some cases may provide additional comfort)
There must be no break in trading
Where the seller is a taxable person (VAT registered) the purchaser must be a taxable person already or immediately become, as a result of the transfer, a taxable person
Where only part of a business is sold it must be capable of separate operation
There must not be a series of immediately consecutive transfers
Where the transfer includes property which is standard-rated, either because the seller has opted to tax it or because it is a ‘new’ or uncompleted commercial building the purchaser must opt to tax the property and notify this to HMRC no later than the date of the supply. This may be the date of completion or, if earlier, the date of receipt of payment or part payment (eg; a deposit). There are additional anti-avoidance requirements regarding the buyer’s option to tax

Please note that the above list has been compiled for this article from; the legislation, HMRC guidance and case law. Specific advice must be sought.

Property transfer

The sale of a property may qualify for TOGC if the above tests are met. Usually, but not exclusively, a TOGC sale is the sale of a tenanted building when the sale is with the benefit of the existing lease(s) – (the sale of a property rental business rather than of the property itself). Another example of a property TOGC is where a property under construction is sold (a development business). As may be seen, timing with a property TOGC is of utmost importance. For example, an option to tax one day late will invalidate TOGC treatment. A guide to land and property.

What purpose do the TOGC rules serve?

The TOGC provisions are intended to simplify accounting for VAT when a business changes hands. The main purposes are to:

relieve the buyer from the burden of funding VAT on the purchase, helping businesses by improving their cash flow and avoiding the need to separately value assets which may be liable at different rates or are exempt and which have been sold as a whole
protect government revenue by removing a charge to tax and entitlement to input tax where the output tax may not be paid to HMRC, for example, where a business charges tax, which is claimed by the new business but not paid by the selling business

What if it goes wrong?

TOGC treatment is not optional. A sale is either a TOGC or it isn’t. It is a rare situation in that the VAT treatment depends on; what the purchaser’s intentions are, what the seller is told, and what the purchaser actually does. All this being outside the seller’s control.

Add VAT when TOGC treatment applies:

Often, the TOGC point can be missed, especially in complex property transactions.

The addition of VAT is sometimes considered a “safe” VAT position. However, output tax will have been charged incorrectly, which means that when the buyer claims VAT shown on the relevant invoice, this will be disallowed. This can lead to;

potential penalties and interest from HMRC
the buyer having to recover the VAT payment (often the seller, having sold a business can be difficult to track down and then obtain payment from)
significant cash flow issues (HMRC will need to be repaid the input tax claim immediately)
if a property sale, SDLT is likely to be overpaid

Sale treated as a TOGC when it is a taxable supply:

When VAT free TOGC treatment is applied to a taxable supply (possibly as one, or more of the TOGC conditions are not met) then there is a tax underdeclaration. The seller will be assessed by HMRC and penalties and interest are likely to be levied. There is then the seller’s requirement to attempt to obtain the VAT payment from the buyer. Similarly to above, this is not always straightforward or possible and it may be that the contract prohibits additional payment. There is likely to be unexpected funding issues for the buyer if (s)he does decide to make the payment.

Considering the usually high value of sales of businesses, the VAT cost of getting it wrong can be significant.

Summary

This is a complex area of the tax and an easy issue to miss when there are a considerable number of other factors to consider when a business is sold. Extensive case law (example here and changes to HMRC policy here ) insists that there is often a dichotomy between a commercial interpretation of a going concern and HMRC’s view. I sometimes find that the buyer’s intentions change such that the TOGC initially applied becomes invalid when the change in the use of assets (from what was notified to the seller) actually takes place. HMRC is not always sympathetic in these situations. One of the questions I am often asked is: “How long does the buyer have to operate the business after purchase so that TOGC treatment applies?” Unsurprisingly, there is no set answer to this and HMRC do not set a specific period. My view, and it is just my view, is that an absolute minimum time is one VAT quarter.

Contracts are important in most TOGC cases, so it really pays to review them from a VAT perspective.

I very strongly advise that specialist advice is obtained in cases where a business, or property is sold. Yes, I know I would say that!

VAT: Land & Property – Option To Tax Update

By Marcus Ward 3 June 2019

Who opts to tax?

HMRC have published an updated Public Notice 742A The changes are in connection with authorised signatories, in particular; corporate bodies, overseas entities and powers of attorney. It is important to establish who can sign an option to tax (OTT) form VAT1614A as getting it wrong may invalidate an OTT with potentially very expensive consequences.

A guide to the OTT here.

It seems an appropriate time to look at who can sign an OTT form. HMRC guidance states:

“The person responsible for making the decision and notifying the option to tax depends on the type of legal entity holding (or intending to hold) the interest in the land or building, and who within that entity has the authority to make decisions concerning VAT. In most cases it will be the sole proprietor, one or more partners (or trustees), a director or an authorised administrator. If you have appointed a third party to notify an option to tax on your behalf, HMRC requires written confirmation that the third party is authorised to do so.”

Some specific situations:

Beneficial owners

In cases where there is both a beneficial owner and a legal owner of land or buildings for VAT purposes it is the beneficial owner who is making the supply of the land or building. It is therefore the beneficial owner who should OTT. This may not be the case where the beneficiaries are numerous, such as unit trusts and pension funds. In these cases, the person deemed to be making the supply is the trustee who holds the legal interest and receives the immediate benefit of the consideration.

Joint owners

Joint ownership is where two entities purchase land or buildings together, or one party sells a share in property to another party. Usually, a supply may only be made by both entities together. The two entities should OTT together as a single option and register for VAT account for output tax as a single entity (usually a partnership even if it is not a partnership for any other purpose.).

Limited partnerships

Under the Limited Partnership Act 1907 every limited partnership must be registered with Companies House. A limited partnership is made up of one or more general partners, who have unlimited liability, and one or more ‘limited’ partners, who are not liable for debts and obligations of the firm. A limited partner is unable to take part in the management.

If there is only one general partner and one or more limited partners, the general partner is treated as a sole proprietor for VAT registration purposes. If there are two or more general partners and one or more limited partners, the general partners are treated as a partnership. It is the general partners who should OTT.

Limited liability partnerships (LLPs)

An LLP has separate legal status from its members and is able to enter into contracts in its own right. An LLP is a body corporate and is may register for VAT. If the partnership decides to OTT, one or more members, as the authorised signatory must sign the notification.

Authorised persons for particular legal entities

In order for an OTT to be notified effectively, it must be signed and dated by an authorised person who possesses the legal capacity to notify a decision.

List of authorised signatories

Legal entity	Authorised persons
Sole trader (proprietor)	Owner of the business
Trust	Trustee (or partner if VAT2 is completed)
Partnership (UK)	Any partner (on VAT2)
Partnership (Scotland)	Any partner
Limited partnership (UK)	General partner
Limited partnership (Scotland)	General partner
Limited Liability Partnership	Designated member or member
Unincorporated Association	Chairperson, treasurer, trustee or company secretary
Limited company	Company director or company secretary
Community Interest Company (CIC)	Company director or company secretary
Charitable Incorporated Organisation	Director, chairperson, treasurer, trustee, or company secretary
Community Benefit Society	Chairperson, treasurer, trustee or company secretary
Local Authority	Section 151 officer (or Section 95 officer in Scotland), town clerk, head of finance, or treasurer
VAT group	Director or company secretary of the group member that owns the property
Government department	Nominated VAT liaison officer or finance manager (or a person senior to either)
Corporate body acting as a director, trustee or company secretary	Any office holder or employee authorised by the corporate body (as long as the corporate body itself has authorisation from the owner the property)
Overseas entity	Director or manager
Power of attorney	Anyone granted a power of attorney to administer or manage the tax affairs of the owner of a property

Commentary

An invalid OTT may result in, among other things:

Input tax recovery being barred
A potential Transfer of a Going Concern (TOGC) becoming subject to VAT
VAT registration being denied
Unwanted complexity in transactions with the potential for a deal to be aborted
Costs in unwinding the VAT position (if firefighting is possible)
Uncertainty
Delays in transactions
A dispute between two sides to a transaction
Past input tax being the subject of clawback
The Capital Goods Scheme (CGS) being triggered resulting in VAT costs and complexity
HMRC levying penalties and interest

It is important to get the, seemingly simple, process of OTT right, and right first time!

The ABC of VAT – property

By Marcus Ward 28 May 2019

A glossary

Anyone who has had even the slightest brush with VAT will know that it is a very complex tax. Now, multiply that complexity by the intricacy and occasionally arcane nature of property law and one may see that the outcome will be less than straightforward. I have produced a general guide and an article on residential property VAT Triggerpoints

I hope the following glossary will help with steering through some of the difficulties.

Annex– a building which is joined to or is next to a larger main building usually an extension or addition to a building
Assign – to transfer the right or interest in a property from one party to another
Break clause – a clause allowing either landlord or tenant to give written notice after a particular date or period of the tenancy in order to end the tenancy
Beneficial owner – party deemed to make a supply of property rather than the legal owner
Blocked input tax – VAT which a developer is unable to recover when constructing a new dwelling. Typically, expenditure on good such as; carpets, fitted furniture, and gas and electrical appliances
Building materials– goods ordinarily incorporated into a property which attracts similar VAT treatment to the construction services.
Capital Goods Scheme(CGS) – a method of calculating the recovery amount of input tax incurred on property over a ten-year period, Details of the CGS here
Certificate – a document issued to a supplier in order to obtain certain zero-rated or reduced-rated building work
Change of number of dwellings– usually a conversion from commercial to residential, or a single house into flats (or flats into a single house) at 5% VAT
Consideration– a thing done or given in exchange for something else = a supply. Usually quantified in money, but in some cases non-monetary consideration
Construction of new dwellings – a zero rated supply
Contract – legal document detailing the agreement of terms between the vendor and buyer
Contractor – entity responsible for building works
Conversion–work on a non-residential building which results in a property designed as a dwelling(s) being created
Covenants – rules governing the property in its title deeds or lease. May impact the definition of dwellings
Curtilage– either a garden, or an area surrounding a building which is deemed to be part of the property
Designed as a dwelling– a property initially designed for residential use, regardless of any subsequent alternative use
Dilapidations – items that have been damaged during a tenancy for which the tenant is responsible for the cost of repair or replacement. Usually VAT free
DIY Housebuilders’ Scheme – a scheme which ‘self-builders’ to recover VAT on a new build dwelling or conversion. Details here
Dwelling– a building deemed to be residential
Empty house – if, in the ten years before work on a dwelling starts, it has not been lived in, the work may be subject to 5% rather than 20% VAT
Exempt– a supply that is VAT free. It usually results in attributable input tax falling to be irrecoverable
Facade– a wall (or two walls on a corner plot) which may be retained without affecting the zero rating of a new dwelling construction
Grant– a supply of an interest in land
Holiday home – the sale or long lease of a holiday home cannot be zero-rated even if it is designed as a dwelling
Housing Association – a non-profit organisation which rents residential property to people on low incomes or with particular needs
In the course of construction– meaningful works that have occurred in relation to the construction of a building (but prior to its completion)
Incorporated goods – goods sold with a new dwelling which are zero rated and to which the input tax block does not apply. See white goods
Input tax– VAT incurred on expenditure associated with property
Interest in, or right over, land– the right to access to and use of, land. Usually via ownership or lease
Lease – legal document governing the occupation by the tenant of a premises for a specific length of time
Licence to occupy– a permission to use land that does not amount to a tenancy
Live-work units – a property that combines a dwelling and commercial or industrial working space. Usually subject to apportionment
Major interest–a supply of a freehold interest or a lease exceeding 21 years
Multiple occupancy dwelling – a dwelling which is designed for occupation by persons not forming a single household
New building–a commercial building less than three years old the sale of which is mandatorily standard
Non-residential– a commercial building which is not used as a dwelling
Open market value – likely sale price with a willing seller and buyer, with a reasonable period of marketing and no special factors affecting the property
Option to tax (OTT) – act of changing the exempt sale or letting of a commercial into a taxable supply. The purpose is to either; recover input tax or avoid input tax being charged. Details here
OTT disapplication– the legal removal of a vendor’s option to tax
OTT not applicable – the OTT does not apply to residential buildings (so VAT can never apply to dwellings)
OTT revocation– the ability to revoke an option to tax after six months or twenty years
Partial exemption– a calculation to attribute input tax to exempt and taxable. Generally, VAT incurred in respect of exempt supplies is irrecoverable
Person constructing – a developer, contractor or sub-contractor who constructs a building
Premium – upfront payment for a supply of property
Relevant Charitable Purpose (RCP)–the use by a charity for non-business purposes or for use as a village hall or similar
Relevant Residential Purpose (RRP)– dwelling used for certain defined residential purposes, eg; children’s home, a hospice or student accommodation
Reverse surrender– a tenant surrenders an onerous lease to the landlord and makes a payment to surrender
Share of freehold – where the freehold of the property is owned by a company and the shareholders are the owners of the property
Single household dwelling– a building designed for occupation by a single household
Snagging – the correction of building faults. Usually follows the VAT liability of the original work
Stamp Duty Land Tax (SDLT) – tax paid by a purchaser of a property. SDLT is increased if the sale of a commercial property is the subject of an option to tax
Substantial reconstruction– certain significant works to a listed building
Surrender– a tenant surrenders the lease to the landlord in return for payment
Taxable supply– a supply subject to VAT at the standard, reduced or zero-rate
Use as a dwelling – a building which was designed or adapted for use as someone’s home and is so used
Vendor – entity selling a property
Transfer of a Going Concern (TOGC) – the VAT free sale of the assets of a business as a going concern. This may include a tenanted property
Zero-rated– a taxable supply subject to VAT at a rate of 0%

We strongly recommend that advice is obtained if any property transaction is being undertaken.

Details of our land and property services may be found here.

VAT – Business Entertainment Flowchart. What input tax may I recover?

By Marcus Ward 10 May 2019

Input tax recovery on entertainment

One of the most common questions asked on “day-to-day” VAT is whether input tax incurred on entertainment is claimable. The answer to this seemingly straightforward question has become increasingly complex as a result of; HMRC policy, EC involvement and case law. Different rules apply to entertaining; clients, contacts, staff, partners and directors depending on the circumstances. It seems reasonable to treat entertaining costs as a valid business expense. After all, a business, amongst other things, aims to increase sales and reduce costs as a result of these meetings. However, HMRC sees things differently and there is a general block on business entertainment. It seems like HMRC does not like watching people enjoying themselves at the government’s expense!

If, like me, you think in pictures, then a flowchart may be useful for deciding whether to claim entertainment VAT. It covers all scenarios, but if you have a unique set of circumstances or require assistance with some of the definitions, please contact me.

VAT – Business Entertainment Flowchart

The future of VAT and online marketplaces

By Marcus Ward 7 May 2019

Latest

The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) recently held a forum which considered how to level the playing field between traditional and online businesses and to collect the correct amount of tax. It is recognised that the current rules and different application of those rules in different countries has led to VAT not being collected in full in respect of online transactions.

OECD

The OECD Global Forum on VAT is a platform for a global dialogue on international VAT standards and key issues of VAT policy and operation.

The report

The subsequent report The role of digital platforms in the collection of VAT/GST on online sales focuses on the design of rules and mechanisms for the effective collection of VAT on digital sales of goods, services and intangibles, including sales by offshore digital sellers. It states that it provides “practical guidance to tax authorities on the design and implementation of a variety of solutions for enlisting the platforms economy, including e-commerce marketplaces and other digital platforms, in the effective and efficient collection of VAT/GST on digital sales”.

Background

Tax action is necessary as global B2C e-commerce sales of goods alone are now estimated to be worth in the region of USD 2 trillion annually with projections indicating they may reach USD 4.5 trillion by 2021, USD 1 trillion of which is estimated to be cross-border e-commerce with approximately 1.6 billion consumers buying online. This clearly represents considerable VAT revenue which is at stake.

See details on online evasion here

Issues

The problems which have been identified in previous report are:

imports of low-value parcels from online sales which are treated as VAT free in many jurisdictions, and
the strong growth in the trade of services and intangibles, particularly B2C, on which often no, or an inappropriately low amount of VAT is levied due to the complexity of enforcing VAT payment on such supplies

Exemptions for imports of low-value goods have become increasingly controversial in the growing digital economy. At the time when most of these exemptions were introduced, internet shopping did not exist and the level of imports benefitting from the relief was relatively small. Over recent years, many countries have seen a significant and rapid growth in the volume of low-value imports of goods on which VAT is not collected. This results in decreased VAT revenues and unfair competitive pressures on domestic retailers who are required to charge VAT on their sales.

Summary

The focus was on the rôle of digital platforms. These are capable of collecting a vast amount of data. The report stated that it is reasonable to require this information/data to be shared and that is proportionately relevant for VAT compliance purposes, ie; necessary to satisfy the tax authorities that the tax for a supply has been charged and accounted for correctly by the underlying supplier.

The two potential models are:

to make the digital platform fully liable for the payment and remittance of VAT on the online sales they facilitate
or, alternatively, to limit the responsibility of the digital platforms to simply assisting authorities in the collection of VAT

Implementation

Two options could be considered for the implementation of any information sharing obligation for digital platforms in connection to online sales:

provision of information on request. Under this option, a jurisdiction requires that a digital platform retains records of the sales that are subject to VAT in that jurisdiction, and that this information be made available on request.
systematic provision of information. Via this option, a digital platform is required to systematically and periodically provide information on online sales carried out via the platform to the tax authority of the jurisdiction of taxation.

Overall

The report is a good “solid” and long study (I cannot however, recommend it as holiday reading, although the above précis may assist). The proposed solutions are sensible, considered and workable and are likely to, at least, provide more equality and a better way for tax authorities to collect tax which is due.