Category Archives: Land & Property

VAT: Is the supply of football pitches an exempt right over land? The Netbusters case.

By   11 November 2020
0

Latest from the courts.

In the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) case of Netbusters (UK) Limited the issue was whether the supply was the standard rated provision of sporting facilities, or an exempt right over land.

Background

Netbusters organised football and netball leagues and provided the playing facilities (artificial pitches for football and courts for netball). The hire of the facilities was for a defined period of time and no other party had the right to access the pitches during those times. The hire could be a block, or one-off booking. The appellant contended that the supplies were exempt via VAT Act 1994, Sch 9, Group 1 – “The grant of any interest in or right over land or of any licence to occupy land…”  However, item 1 Note (para m) excludes the “the grant of facilities for playing any sport or participating in any physical recreation” in which case they become standard rated. To add complexity, Note 16 overrides the exception for sporting facilities (so they are exempt) if the grant of the facilities is for:

“(a) a continuous period of use exceeding 24 hours; or

(b) a series of 10 or more periods, whether or not exceeding 24 hours in total, where the following conditions are satisfied—

(i) each period is in respect of the same activity carried on at the same place;

(ii) the interval between each period is not less than one day and not more than 14 days;

(iii) consideration is payable by reference to the whole series and is evidenced by written agreement;

(iv) the grantee has exclusive use of the facilities; and

(v) the grantee is a school, a club, an association or an organisation representing affiliated clubs or constituent associations.”

I have a simplified flowchart which may assist if you, or your clients, need to look at these types of supplies further.

Another issue was whether Netbusters’ league/tournament management services which were, in principle, available independently of pitch hire, but in practice rarely were provided in that way, were separate supplies or composite. There was a single price payable for both pitch hire and league management services.

The appellant contended that its supplies were exempt via VAT Act 1994, Sch 9, Group 1 or that Revenue and Customs Brief 8 (2014): sports leagues, is applicable which states “HMRC accepts that the decision of the FTT is applicable to all traders who operate in circumstances akin to Goals Soccer Centres plc. This includes traders who hire the pitches from third parties such as local authorities, schools and clubs…”

HMRC argued that there was no intention to create a tenancy and the agreements between the parties did not provide for exclusive use of the premises, so the supplies fell to be standard rated.

Decision

The appeal was allowed; the supply was a singe exempt supply because the objective character of the supplies were properly categorised as the granting of interests in, rights over or licenses to occupy land. It was found to be significant Netbusters (or its customers) had the ability to exclude others from the pitches during the period of the matches.

It was therefore unnecessary to consider whether Netbusters’ supplies grants of facilities satisfy all the conditions set out in Note 16 (although the FTT were disinclined to do this anyway as a consequence of the way respondent prepared its case).

Commentary

The issue of the nature sporting rights has a long and acrimonious history both in the UK and EU courts. Any business providing similar services are advised to review the VAT treatment applied.

VAT: Airbnb – a warning

By   5 October 2020
0

Airbnb’s most recent accounts contain a statement that the company will share data on landlord’s income with HMRC. This information goes back to 2017.

If a property owner uses the Airbnb platform and has income over £85,000 in any twelve month period they will be required to VAT register if they have not also done so.

With the information HMRC will be able to target those business which have failed to register and, as always with VAT, if you have not, there is a penalty.

The amount of the penalty will depend on the amount of VAT due and how late the person letting property was in telling HMRC that the business should have registered (or when HMRC discovered the ‘error”).

The penalty is calculated as a percentage of the VAT due, from the date when the business should have registered to the date when HMRC either received the relevant notification, or became aware that it was required to be registered.

If a business registeredPenalty rate is
not more than 9 months late5%
more than 9 months but not more than 18 months late10%
more than 18 months late.15%

We advise that any business which is required to be VAT registered, but isn’t to contact HMRC – before they contact you…

VAT Planning – Why?

By   20 August 2020
0

Why? How? Where? When? What? Who?

Why?

It is impossible for any business to do such a basic thing as set its prices properly unless it understands its VAT position and ensures that this is reflected in those prices, terms and contract terms etc. The aims of tax planning are:

  • compliance
  • business planning
  • avoiding unnecessary tax costs
  • maximising input tax claims
  • minimising VAT payable where possible
  • obtaining any refunds and retrospective claims due
  • avoiding penalties and interest

How?

The “How?” is dependent on the specific business and its needs. We offer a flexible and tailored service from start-ups to multi-national companies. We offer:

  • solutions to ad hoc issues
  • negotiation
  • structuring and restructuring
  • contractual arrangements
  • Dispute resolution (with HMRC, suppliers, customers etc)
  • full reviews and health checks
  • training of staff and management
  • assistance with international/cross-border supplies and purchases
  • due diligence
  • cost reduction exercises
  • income maximisation programmes
  • comprehensive land and property advice
  • advice on overseas indirect/GST matters both EC and non-EC
  • accounting and documentation advice

The VAT planning process – “The four As”

  • Ascertainment
  • Analysis
  • Alternatives
  • Action

More details of this approach here.

Where?

VAT, or its derivations applies in most countries around the world. So, the answer is probably “everywhere”. This is particularly relevant with cross-border transactions. A common issue is the “Place Of Supply” (POS) rules which dictate where a supply takes place and thus the VAT liability of it.

When?

Planning needs to be done in advance of transactions.  Once a contract has been entered into without thought for the VAT consequences, the damage may have already been done.

Where there is a one-off transaction (eg; sale of premises, sale of know-how, issue of shares), this is, by definition, something of which the business has little experience.  It is an occasion to assume that advice is needed, rather than to assume that the most obvious treatment is correct.

Since the impact of a change in the pattern of a business’ activities will continue down the years, rather than being restricted to a single occasion, it is doubly important to ensure that the correct treatment is identified from the outset.

Periodic reviews are a good time to look, not only at the future, but also at the past, to see whether developments in case law reveal past overpayments which may be reclaimed.  This is particularly important since repayments are subject to the four-year capping provisions.

The essential step is to have some means of becoming aware of changes and monitoring these with VAT in mind.  The means to be adopted are various and will depend on the size and type of the business.

What?

“Right tax, right time”. This means compliance with the relevant legislation but not paying any more VAT than is necessary. As one wag once said; “You must pay taxes. But there’s no law that says you have to leave a tip.”

Since VAT is a transaction-based tax, timing is often crucial and the objective is to legitimately defer payment to HMRC until the latest time possible, thus improving cash flow and retaining the use of VAT monies for as long as possible. The converse of this of course, is to obtain any repayments of VAT due from HMRC as soon as possible. We must also consider avoiding VAT representing an actual cost and taking advantage of any beneficial UK and EC legislation, determinations, guidance, case law and Business Briefs etc available.

VAT Planning objectives

  • improve cash flow
  • improve competitive position
  • legitimately reducing VAT payments or increasing repayments
  • minimise administration/management
  • avoid unnecessary tax or compliance costs
  • avoid penalties and interest

Who?

Marcus Ward Consultancy of course!

VAT: New HMRC guidance on amendments to leases due to COVID 19

By   7 August 2020
0

HMRC has published guidance: Revenue and Customs Brief 11 (2020) on how some arrangements between landlords and tenants affect VAT (and Stamp Duty Land Tax). HMRC recognises that such changes have become more frequent as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic.

As a result of the current pandemic, many tenants are suffering a loss of income and want to vary the terms of their lease with their landlord. The brief provides guidance on the appropriate VAT treatment of the most common lease variations, specifically those:

  • which vary the amount of rent a tenant pays
  • where a lease extension is being agreed

As always with VAT, the correct treatment will depend on the actual agreements which the landlord and tenant enter into.

Examples

Examples of lease variations are:

  • period of reduced rent
  • rent-free period
  • rent holiday

In the guidance HMRC give examples of four examples of lease variations, but the main issue in all of them is what the tenant does in return for the variation; if anything.

VAT Treatment

Generally speaking, if a tenant makes no payment there is no supply, and so no change in the tax liability of the supply made by the landlord to the tenant. However, in cases where the tenant does something in return for a reduction in rent (which equates to consideration, albeit non-monetary) this is usually a supply by the tenant to the landlord. An example of this is; if the tenant agrees to carry out work to the building for the landlord’s benefit.

In such cases the rent reduction is equal to the value of that supply and the landlord must account for the VAT as though the rent was still being paid (if they have opted to tax the property).

Value of landlord’s supply

If the tenant does nothing in return for a reduction in the rent payable, output tax is only due on the reduced or deferred amount of rent received by the landlord- assuming an option to tax is in place.

Invoices

If both supplies are taxable at the standard rate, the amounts of VAT due on each supply are likely to be similar and the landlord and tenant will need to issue VAT invoices to each other. The input tax claimable is dependent on the overall partial exemption status of the parties. It is not possible to “net-off” the value of the supplies.

Commentary

There have been no changes to legislation or HMRC’s approach in these cases, but the guidance id a helpful reminder that VAT (and SDLT) must be considered in any lease variations.

VAT – Residential Property Triggerpoints

By   13 July 2020
0

What to look out for

VAT and property transactions are uneasy bedfellows at the best of times.  Getting the tax wrong, or failing to consider it at all can result in a loss of income of 20% on a project, or forgoing all input tax incurred on a development. Even a simple matter of timing can affect a transaction to a seller’s detriment. Here I take a brief look at issues that can impact residential property transactions.  It is important to recognise when VAT may affect a project so I hope that some of these triggerpoints may prove useful.

General points

The following are very general points on residential properties. No two cases are the same, so we strongly recommend that specific advice is obtained.

Refurbishing “old” residential properties

Broadly speaking, the VAT incurred on such work is not reclaimable as the end use of the property will be exempt (either sale or rent). There is no way round this as it is not possible to opt to tax residential dwellings. It may be possible to use the partial exemption de minimis limits if there are any other business activities in the same VAT registration. If this is the only activity of a business, it will not even be permitted to register for VAT. There are special rules if the number of dwellings change as a result of the work (see below).

New residential builds

The first sale (or the grant of a long lease 21 years plus) of a newly constructed dwelling by “the person constructing” is zero rated. This means that any VAT incurred on the construction is recoverable. Care should be taken if the new dwelling is let on a short term basis rather than/before being sold as this will materially affect input tax recovery.  Advice should always be taken before such a decision is made as there is planning available to avoid such an outcome. VAT incurred on professional and legal costs of the development may also be recovered such as; architects, solicitors, advisers, agents etc. VAT registration is necessary in these cases and our advice is to VAT register at the earliest stage possible.

The construction of new dwellings is zero rated, along with any building materials supplied by the contractor carrying out the work.  The zero rating also extends to sub-contractors.  It is not necessary for a certificate to be provided in order to zero rate such building works.

Conversions

There are special rules for refurbishments which create a different number of dwellings (eg; dividing up a single house into flats, or changing the total number of flats in a block, or making one dwelling by amalgamating flats). Generally, it is possible for contractors to invoice for their building work at the reduced rate of 5%. This rate may also apply to conversions. A conversion is defined as work undertaken on a non-residential property, such as a barn, office or church, into one or more self-contained dwellings.  Once converted the sale of the residential property will be zero rated and all of the input tax incurred on associated costs is recoverable (similar to a new build).

Renovation of empty residential premises

Reduced rating at 5% is also available for the renovation or alteration of empty residential premises. Such a premises is one that has not been lived in during the two years immediately before the work starts. HMRC will insist on documentary evidence that the property has been empty for that time.

Purchase of a commercial property intended for conversion

If it is intended to convert a commercial property into residential use and the vendor indicates that (s)he will charge VAT (as a result of the option to tax having been exercised) it is possible for the purchaser to disapply the option to tax by the issue of a certain document; form VAT 1614D. This means that the sale will become exempt.  Advice should always be sought on this issue by parties on each side of the transaction as it very often creates difficulties and significant VAT and other costs (mainly for the vendor).

Mixed developments

If what is being constructed is a building that is only in part a zero-rated dwelling, a contractor can only zero-rate its work for the qualifying parts. For example, if a building  containing a shop with a flat above is constructed, only the construction of the flat can be zero-rated. An apportionment must be made for common areas such as foundations and roof etc. The sale of the residential element when complete is zero rated and the sale of the commercial part will be standard rated if under three years since completion.  If the commercial part is over three years old at the date of sale, or is rented rather than sold, the supply will be exempt with the option to tax available – details here.  If an exempt supply is made, the recovery of input tax incurred on the development will be compromised and it is important that this recognised and planning put in place to avoid this outcome.

DIY building projects

There is a specific scheme for DIY Housebuilders to recover input tax incurred on the construction of a dwelling for the constructor to live in personally.  Details here https://www.marcusward.co/?s=diy

Sale of an incomplete residential development

There are two possible routes to relief if a project is sold before dwellings have been completed (either new build or conversion).  This can often be a complex area, however, there is some zero rating relief which may apply, and also it may be possible to apply TOGC (Transfer Of a Going Concern) treatment to the sale.  In both cases, it is likely that input tax previously claimed by the developer should not be jeopardised.

Overview

There are VAT complications for the following types of transactions/developments and issues:

  • definition of a dwelling
  • arrangements where consortiums or syndicates are used/profit share
  • transactions in connection with nursing or children’s homes or similar
  • “granny flats” in the garden of existing houses
  • work on charitable buildings/ for charities
  • converting specific commercial property into residential property – particularly ex-pubs
  • sales to Housing Associations
  • sales of “substantially reconstructed protected buildings”
  • buying VATable buildings
  • date of completion – zero rating cut off
  • supplies by members of VAT groups
  • definition of building materials
  • input tax on white goods and similar
  • alterations for people with disabilities
  • garages with dwellings
  • land supplied with a property
  • buying property with existing, continuing leases
  • beneficial owner versus legal owner issues
  • change of intention (buying land/property with the intention of using it for one purpose, but the intention changes after purchase)
  • where professional/architect’s fees are incurred
  • planning gains
  • own use of a property
  • mobile homes
  • reverse premiums/surrenders/reverse surrenders re; leases
  • holiday lets and
  • hotels
  • business use by purchaser/tenant
  • contract stage of a property purchase where VAT is potentially chargeable by vendor
  • timing of supplies
  • work re; schools, churches, village halls, hospitals, or any other “unusual” structures

This list is not exhaustive, but I hope it gives a broad idea of where VAT needs to be considered “before the event”. As always, we are available to assist.

VAT – Building your new home: How and what to claim

By   17 June 2020
0

Building your own home is becoming increasingly popular.  There are many things to think about, and budgeting is one of the most important. 

The recovery of VAT on the project has a huge impact on the budget and care must be taken to ensure that a claim is made properly and within the time limits.  You don’t have to be VAT registered to make a claim, this is done via a mechanism known as The DIY Housebuilders’ Scheme.  It has specific rules which must be adhered to otherwise the claim will be rejected.

If you buy a new house from a property developer, you will not be charged VAT. This is because the sale of the house to you will be zero-rated. This allows the developer to reclaim the VAT paid on building materials from HMRC. However, if you build a house yourself, you will not be able to benefit from the zero-rating. The DIY Housebuilder’ Scheme puts you in a similar position to a person who buys a zero-rated house built by a property developer.

Who can make a claim?

You can apply for a VAT refund on building materials and services if you are:

  • building a new home in which you will live
  • converting a building into a home
  • building a non-profit communal residence, eg; a hospice
  • building a property for a charity

Eligibility

New homes

The house must:

  • be separate and self-contained eg; not an extension
  • be for you or your family to live or holiday in (not for sale when complete)
  • not be for business purposes (although you can use one room as a work from home office)
  • not be prevented from sale independently to another building by planning permission or similar eg; a granny annexe

A claim may also be made for garages built at the same time as the house and to be used with the house.

Contractors working on new residential buildings should zero rate their supplies to you, so you won’t pay any VAT on these.

Conversions

The building being converted must usually be a non-residential building eg; a barn conversion. Also, residential buildings qualify if they haven’t been lived in for at least 10 years.

You may claim a refund for builders’ work on a conversion of non-residential building into home. These supplies will be charged at the reduced rate of 5% for conversion works.  If the standard rate of 20% s charged incorrectly, you will not be able to claim the standard rated amount. Care should be taken that the contractor understands the VAT rules for conversions as these can be complex.

Communal and charity buildings

You may get a VAT refund if the building is for one of the following purposes:

  • non-business – you can’t charge a fee for the use of the building
  • charitable, eg; a hospice
  • residential, eg; a children’s home

What can you claim on?

Building materials – You may claim a VAT refund for building materials that are incorporated into the building and can’t be removed without tools or damaging the building.

What doesn’t qualify

You cannot claim for:

  • building projects outside the UK
  • materials or services that don’t have any VAT, eg;  were zero-rated or exempt
  • professional or supervisory fees, eg; architects and surveyors
  • the hire of plant, tools and equipment, eg; generators, scaffolding and skips
  • building materials that aren’t permanently attached to or part of the building itself
  • some fitted furniture, electrical and gas appliances, carpets or garden ornaments
  • supplies for which you do not have a VAT invoice

Examples of items you can, and cannot claim for are listed below.

How to claim

To claim a VAT refund, send form 431NB or 431C to HMRC

Local Compliance National DIY Team
SO987
Newcastle
NE98 1ZZ

What you need to know

You must claim within three months of the building work being completed.

You will usually get the refund in 30 working days of sending the claim.

You must include the following with your claim:

  • bank details
  • planning permission
  • proof the building work is finished eg; a letter from your local authority
  • a full set of building plans
  • invoices – including tenders or estimations if the invoice isn’t itemised
  • bills and any credit notes

VAT invoices must be valid and show the correct rate of VAT or they will not be accepted in the claim.

HMRC usually examine every claim closely and often query them, so it pays to ensure that the claim is as accurate as possible first time.  We find a review by us before submission ensures the maximum amount is claimed and delays are avoided.

Payments made after completion of the house cannot be claimed, and only one claim can be made for the whole project, so cashflow may be an issue.

Examples of items that you can claim for

The items listed below are accepted as being ‘ordinarily’ incorporated in a building (or its site). This is not a complete list.

  • air conditioning
  • building materials that make up the fabric of the property eg; bricks, cement, tiles, timber, etc
  • burglar and fire alarms
  • curtain poles and rails
  • fireplaces and surrounds
  • fitted kitchen furniture, sinks, and work surfaces
  • flooring materials (other than carpets and carpet tiles)
  • some gas and electrical appliances when wired-in or plumbed-in
  • heating and ventilation systems including solar panels
  • light fittings – including chandeliers and outside lights
  • plumbing materials, including electric showers, ‘in line’ water softeners and sanitary ware
  • saunas
  • turf, plants, trees (to the extent that they are detailed on scheme approved by a Planning Permission) and fencing permanently erected around the boundary of the dwelling
  • TV aerials and satellite dishes

Examples of items that you cannot claim for

This is not a complete list.

  • Aga/range cookers (unless they are solid fuel, oil-fired or designed to heat space or water)
  • free-standing and integrated appliances such as: cookers, fridges, freezers, dishwashers, microwaves, washing machines, dryers, coffee machines
  • audio equipment, built-in speakers, intelligent lighting systems, satellite boxes, Freeview boxes
  • consumables eg; sandpaper, white spirit
  • electrical components for garage doors and gates
  • bedroom furniture (unless they are basic wardrobes) bathroom furniture eg; vanity units and free-standing units
  • curtains and blinds
  • carpets and rugs
  • garden furniture and ornaments and sheds

Please contact us if you require assistance with a DIY Housebuild project.

VAT: Domestic Reverse Charge for construction services delayed until 1 March 2021

By   5 June 2020
0

Further to my article on the Domestic Reverse Charge (DRC) for builders being deferred, HMRC has announced a further delay from 1 October 2020 until 1 March 2021 due to the impact of the coronavirus on the construction sector.

Revenue and Customs Brief 7 (2020 sets out the details.

Changes

HMRC announced that there will be an amendment to the original legislation, which was laid in April 2019, to make it a requirement that for businesses to be excluded from the reverse charge because they are end users or intermediary suppliers, they must inform their sub-contractors in writing that they are end users or intermediary suppliers. Details of the DRC here and here.







VAT: Intention is crucial – The Sonaecom case

By   18 May 2020
0

We cannot control the future…

The Sonaecom case

In the opinion* of the CJEU AG (C-42/19) the importance of a taxpayer’s intention was of utmost importance, regardless of whether that intention was achieved.

Background

Sonaecom intended to acquire a telecoms provider company. As is usual in such cases, input tax was incurred on consultancy received, from, amongst others; accountants and legal service providers. The intention post acquisition was for Sonaecom to make certain charges to the acquired co. These would have been taxable supplies.

Unfortunately, the intended purchase was aborted.

 The issue

The issue before the AG was; as no taxable supplies took place as the deal fell through – to what should the input tax incurred on advice be attributed?

Opinion

In the AG’s view the fact that the acquisition was aborted was no reason for the claim for input tax to denied. This was based on the fact that:

  • Sonaecom was not a “pure holding company”
  • There was a genuine intention to make taxable supplies (to the acquired co)
  • There was a direct and immediate link between the costs and the intended supplies
  • Although the acquisition costs would exceed the proposed management charges, this was not a reason to invalidate the claim
  • The above analysis was not affected by the fact that the transaction did not take place

Commentary

There are often issues in relation to intentions of a taxpayer. It is clear, and was emphasised in this case, that intention is all important. Of course, intentions can change over a period of time and commercial and political events may thwart or cause intentions to be re-evaluated. There is often an issue about evidencing an intention. HMRC usually require comprehensive documentary evidence to demonstrate an objective. Such evidence is sometime not available for various reasons. Consequently, it is prudent for businesses to record (board meeting minutes etc at the very least) the commercial reasons for taking a certain course of action. This issue quite often arises in transactions in land and property – which can create additional technical issues.

There is legislation in place to cover situations when intentions, or actual events change and which affect the original input tax position: The Capital Goods Scheme (CGS) and The Value Added Tax Regulations 1995, Regs 108 and 109.

Other areas of VAT which often to raise issues are management charges and holding companies. HMRC apparently continue to be eager to attack taxpayers in these areas and I have looked at the role of holding companies and the VAT treatment here, here and here.

I think it is useful to bear in mind a question which, in itself does not evidence an intention, but provides commercial coherence – Why were the costs incurred if there was no intention to make the acquisition? This does leave aside the future management charges position but goes some way to provide business logic.

It will be interesting to see how this case proceeds, but I would find it very surprising if the court diverges from this AG opinion.

*  AG’s Opinion

The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) consists of one judge from each Member State, assisted by eleven Advocates General whose role is to consider the written and oral submissions to the court in every case that raises a new point of law, and deliver an impartial opinion to the court on the legal solution.







VAT: Interaction of Clawback and the Capital Goods Scheme – The Stichting Schoonzicht case

By   10 March 2020
0

Latest from the courts

The difference between intended use and first actual use of an asset.

In the Dutch case of Stichting Schoonzicht (C‑791/18) the AG was asked to provide an opinion on the interaction between clawback and the Capital Goods Scheme (CGS) via Directive 2006/112/EC, Articles 185 and 187. Details of the CGS here. In the UK clawback is set out in The General Regulations 1995, Reg 108.

Background

Stichting Schoonzicht constructed a number of apartments which it intended to sell on completion. This would have been a taxable supply and afforded full input tax recovery on the costs incurred on the development. Unfortunately, due to market conditions, the business was unable to find buyers at the appropriate sale price. Therefore, a decision was made to let some of the flats on a short-term basis until the market picked up. This was done and created an exempt supply. The intention to make taxable supplies remained, but in the meantime, exempt supplies had actually been made. This could affect the original input tax claim. Details of partial exemption here.

Technical 

The Dutch referring court entertained doubts about the compatibility of the ‘first-use full adjustment’ requirement provided for under Netherlands law and the CGS.

So the issue was whether the CGS (Article 187 of the VAT Directive) applied such that any required adjustments to the initial input tax claim could be made via a CGS calculation, or whether, as the Dutch authorities contended, there should be a one-off clawback of the input tax previously claimed.

Decision

In the AG’s opinion, the Dutch tax authorities could clawback 4/7 of the input tax on the construction (as four of the flats were let and three remained unoccupied). The AG decided that the CGS could co-exist with clawback and that EU Member States are allowed to adjust the initial deduction of input tax using clawback where actual use varies from intended use. A distinction was made between clawback and the CGS. The CGS is intended to adjust input tax claims as a result of fluctuations in the taxable use of capital assets over a period of time (ten years for buildings in the UK).

Commentary

In the UK, there are published easements for input tax recovery in similar circumstances: “VAT: Partial Exemption – adjustments when house builders let their dwellings”. However, this is an interesting AG opinion, is worth a read and it will be interesting to see how this develops. However, with prior planning, this situation may be avoided in the UK (where new house sales are zero rated).