Category Archives: Planning

VAT: Education and Health & Welfare – new HMRC guidance

By   23 August 2022
0

The subject of education often gives rise to complex VAT issues – as the number of Tribunal cases illustrates.

Background

A number of schools provide early or pre-school education (before compulsory education). All children aged four should be able to access an early education place and some early education and childcare services offer free part-time early or pre-school education to three year olds. This is paid for at the discretion of Local Authorities. Places for children under three in voluntary or private pre-school settings are paid for mainly by parents.

Update

In light of, inter alia, the Yarburgh Children’s Trust, Wakefield College , Longbridge and St Paul’s Community Project, HMRC has updated to reflect changes to it’s policy in respect of charities supplying; crèche, pre-school education, nursery, after-school clubs and playgroup facilities.

Business test

HMRC’s past position was that if a charity supplied nursery and crèche facilities for a consideration that was fixed at a level designed to only cover its costs, this was not a business activity for VAT purposes. Now the two-part test derived from the Wakefield College Court of Appeal case will be applied:

  • Test One

The activity results in a supply of goods or services for consideration. This requires a legal relationship between the supplier and the recipient. The initial question is whether the supply is made for a consideration. An activity that does not involve the making of supplies for consideration is not a business activity.

  • Test Two

The supply is made for the purpose of obtaining income therefrom (remuneration)

General

The provision of pre-school education (without charge) is non-business; breakfast clubs and after-school child-minding/homework clubs remain non-business in the Local Authority sector even when a charge is made. This is on condition that the school offers the service strictly to its own pupils and that the fee charged is designed to no more than cover overhead costs.

Law

VAT Act 1994, Schedule 9, Group 6 – Education

VAT Act 1994, Schedule 9, Group 7, Item 9 – Health and Welfare

VAT & Customs Duty: Goodbye CHIEF, hello CDS

By   23 August 2022
0

Businesses who import into the UK currently use Customs Handling of Import and Export Freight (CHIEF) to declare goods.

There is also a separate scheme running concurrently, known as Customs Declaration Service (CDS).

From 1 October 2022 CHIEF will cease and importers must use CDS.

Exports

CHIEF is also currently used for exports and this will continue to a later date of: 31 March 2023.

Action

This change will significantly affect all businesses which import goods. Although it is likely that import agents will handle the majority of issues, an importer will be required to:

Failure to comply with these requirements will result in a business being unable to import goods.

VAT: Making Tax Digital (MTD) Reminder

By   23 August 2022
0

HMRC has issued a reminder that:

  • from 1 November 2022, taxpayers will no longer be able to use their existing VAT online account to file their monthly or quarterly VAT returns
  • taxpayers that file annual VAT returns will still be able to use their VAT online account until 15 May 2023
  • by law, VAT-registered businesses must now sign up to MTD and use MTD-compatible software to keep their VAT records and file their VAT returns
  • there are penalties for businesses that do not sign up for MTD and file their VAT returns through MTD-compatible software,
  • even if taxpayers already use MTD-compatible software to keep records and file their VAT returns online, they must sign up to MTD before they file their next return
  • businesses may be able to get a discount on software through the UK Government’s Help to Grow: Digital scheme, which offers 50% off compatible digital accounting software

VAT: Business or non-business? The Towards Zero Foundation case

By   16 August 2022
0

Latest from the courts

In the The Towards Zero Foundation First Tier Tribunal case the issue was whether part of the appellant’s activities could be “stripped out”, classified as non-business, and therefore result in a loss of input tax.

This case follows a long succession of recent cases on the distinction between business (economic activity) and non-business. I have considered these in other articles:

Northumbria Healthcare

Wakefield College (referred to at this Tribunal)

Longbridge

Babylon Farm

A Shoot

Y4 Express

Lajvér Meliorációs Nonprofit Kft. and Lajvér Csapadékvízrendezési Nonprofit Kft

Healthwatch Hampshire CIC 

Pertempts Limited

and new HMRC guidance on the subject.

VAT attributable to non-business activities is not input tax and cannot be reclaimed. However, if the non-business activity is part of wider business activities then it may be recovered as input tax.

Background

The Appellant is a charity. Its primary objective is to achieve zero road traffic fatalities principally through the operation of New Car Assessment Programmes (NCAP) – testing car safety.

When it received money as consideration for carrying out the testing, it was agreed by all parties that that this represented economic activity.

As part of this activity, the charity purchased new cars (so called “mystery shopping” exercises) and carried out tests at its own expense. In this start-up phase for an NCAP it is necessary to test vehicles without manufacturer support as the independence of the testing programme is critical in order to establish consumer credibility.

The results of the tests (usually giving rise to substandard or unsatisfactory outcomes) are published and the Appellant generates publicity of the results through social media, news coverage, trade press etc. These results inform and influence customer buying behaviour which in turn drives manufacturers to improve the safety features.

As the market sophistication increases the NCAP star ratings for vehicles are used by the manufacturers in promotion of its vehicles.

The aim of the Appellant is for each jurisdictional NCAP to ultimately become self-funding through manufacturer testing fees.

Contentions

HMRC argued that when the appellant carried out tests on purchased vehicles this should be recognised as a specific activity which could not be a business as it generated no income – the tests should be considered in isolation. Consequently, the input tax which was recovered was blocked and an assessment was issued to disallow the claim.

The Foundation contended that it published the results of those tests, and this resulted in the commercial need for manufacturers to improve safety standards by way of commissions for further research. This research was funded by the car makers and was therefore economic activity. The “free” testing needed to be undertaken so as to create a market for manufacturer funded testing – the initial testing was just one element of the overall taxable supply. Consequently, all residual input tax incurred is attributed to its taxable business activities and fully recoverable.

Decision

The FTT found that it was clear that manufacturers would not proactively seek to have vehicles tested without an initial unfavourable baseline assessment. If the free testing had been a genuinely independent activity HMRC would be correct, but the evidence did not support this analysis. It found that the provision of free testing was an inherent and integral part of the appellant’s business activity.

This being the case there was no reason to attribute any VAT to non-business activities, and the input tax weas fully claimable.

Commentary

Another reminder, if one were needed, of the importance of correctly establishing whether the activities of a body (usually charities, but not exclusively) are business or non-business. The consequences will affect both the quantum of output tax and claiming VAT on expenditure. More on the topic here.

The decision was as anticipated, but this case illustrates HMRC’s willingness to challenge (often unsuccessfully) VAT treatment in similar situations.

VAT: No invoice – no claim. The Tower Bridge GP Ltd case

By   9 August 2022
0

Latest from the courts

In the Court of Appeal (CoA) case of Tower Bridge GP Ltd the issue was whether the appellant could claim input tax in a situation where it did not (and does not) hold a valid tax invoice.

Background

Tower Bridge was the representative member of a VAT group which contained Cantor Fitzgerald Europe Ltd (CFE). CFE traded in carbon credits. These carbon credit transactions were connected to VAT fraud.

The First Tier Tribunal (FTT) found that CFE neither knew, nor should have known, that the transactions it entered into before 15 June 2009 were connected to VAT fraud but that it should have known that its transactions were connected to fraud from 15 June 2009. The appeal relates only to transactions entered into before that date.

CFE purchased carbon credits from Stratex Alliance Limited (“Stratex”) The carbon credits supplied to CFE were to be used by the business for the purpose of its own onward taxable transactions (in carbon credits). The total of VAT involved was £5,605,119.74.

The Stratex invoices were not valid VAT invoices. They did not show a VAT registration number for Stratex, nor did they name CFE as the customer. Although Stratex was a taxable person, it transpired that Stratex was not registered for VAT (and therefore could not include a valid VAT number on its invoices) and that it fraudulently defaulted on its obligation to account to HMRC for the sums charged as output tax on these invoices.

Subsequent investigations by HMRC resulted in Stratex not being able to be traced.

Contentions

The appellant contended that it is entitled to make the deduction either as of right, or because HMRC unlawfully refused to use its discretion to allow the claim by accepting alternative evidence.

HMRC denied Tower Bridge the recovery of the input tax on the Stratex invoices on the basis that the invoices did not meet the formal legal requirements to be valid VAT invoices. HMRC also refused to exercise their discretion to allow recovery of the input tax on the basis that:

  • Stratex was not registered for VAT
  • the transactions were connected to fraud
  • CFE failed to conduct reasonable due diligence in relation to the transactions

Decision

Dismissing this appeal, the CoA ruled that where an invoice does not contain the information required by legislation (The Value Added Tax Regulations 1995 No 2518 Part III, Regulation 14), or contains an error in that information, which is incapable of correction, the right to deduct cannot be exercised. The appellant did not have the ability to make a claim as of right.

The Court then considered whether HMRC ought to have permitted Tower Bridge to make a claim using alternative evidence. It found that the attack on HMRC’s exercise of discretion fails for the reasons contended by HMRC (above). These were perfectly legitimate matters for HMRC to take into account in deciding whether to exercise the first discretion in the taxable person’s favour.

CFE had failed to carry out “the most basic of checks on Stratex”.

So, the appeal was dismissed.

Commentary

This was hardly a surprising outcome considering that if an exception were to be made, there would be a loss to the public purse consisting of the input tax, with no corresponding gain to the public purse from the output tax that Stratex ought to have paid, but fraudulently did not.

This case demonstrates the importance of obtaining a proper tax invoice and to carry out checks on its validity. Additionally, there is a need to conduct accurate due diligence on the supply chain. I have summarised the importance of Care with input tax claims which includes a helpful list of checks which must be carried out.

VAT – Business Entertainment. What input tax may I recover?

By   4 August 2022
0

VAT – Recovery of input tax incurred on entertainment – Flowchart

One of the most common questions asked on “day-to-day” VAT is whether input tax incurred on entertainment is claimable.  The answer to this seemingly straightforward question has become increasingly complex as a result of; HMRC policy, EU involvement and case law.

Different rules apply to entertaining; clients, contacts, staff, partners and directors depending on the circumstances.  It seems reasonable to treat entertaining costs as a valid business expense.  After all, a business, amongst other things, aims to increase sales and reduce costs as a result of these meetings.  However, HMRC sees things differently and there is a general block on business entertainment.  It seems like HMRC does not like watching people enjoying themselves at the government’s expense!

If, like me, you think in pictures, then a flowchart may be useful for deciding whether to claim entertainment VAT.  It covers all scenarios, but if you have a unique set of circumstances or require assistance with some of the definitions, please contact me.

VAT -Business Entertainment Flowchart

Download here: VAT Business Entertainment Input tax recovery flowchart

VAT: Where’s my reply?!

By   21 July 2022
0

HMRC has launched a new service dashboard which aims to let taxpayers who have written to HMRC know when to expect a reply.

This sounds like a significant development and a very helpful tool for taxpayers and advisers alike. However…

it only covers applications for registration, deregistration and group registration – and only those made by post.

Any other checks are met with a screen stating “You need to use another service to get an update”.

So, a small step in the right direction.

VAT: Updated guidance – Non-Statutory Clearances Service

By   21 July 2022
0

HMRC has published new guidance on the non-statutory clearance service available for all businesses and their advisers.

Non-Statutory clearances

A Non-Statutory clearance is a mechanism where a person can ask HMRC in writing for guidance or advice in certain circumstances. The guidance sets out how to use this procedure. The service is limited, however, and HMRC will only advise if the applicant:

  • has fully read the relevant guidance or contacted the relevant helpline
  • has not been able to find the information required
  • is uncertain about HMRC’s interpretation of tax legislation

However, HMRC will not respond if

  • it is not given all the necessary information —checklists at Annex D (for VAT) provide details of what is required
  • it does not think that there are genuine points of uncertainty – it will explain why HMRC think this and direct the applicant to the relevant online guidance
  • if  HMRC think the clearance request is to give tax planning advice, or to approve tax planning products or arrangements
  • the application is about treatment of transactions which, in HMRC’s view, are for the purposes of avoiding tax
  • HMRC is checking the applicant’s position for the period in question, in which case queries must be directed to the officer dealing with the inspection
  • it is a clearance on matters of fact, such as if certain activities constitute a business
  • there is a statutory clearance applicable to the relevant transaction

HMRC is currently not dealing with postal applications, so a request must be sent by email to nonstatutoryclearanceteam.hmrc@hmrc.gov.uk

HMRC will usually reply within 28 days, but say where difficult or complicated issues are involved it may take longer. If this is the case, HMRC will acknowledge a request and tell the applicant when they can expect a full reply. VAT non-statutory clearance requests are currently taking around 12 weeks to process.

Appeal

There is no general right of appeal against advice given by HMRC, except where rights to appeal are set out in statute.

Appeal rights are usually against decisions HMRC take, such as issuing an assessment for underpaid tax or a penalty.

However, some VAT related decisions are classed as ‘appealable decisions’ by statute. The letter HMRC sends will explain if the applicant is able to appeal and what to do if the applicant disagrees with a VAT decision.

Relying on HMRC advice

There has been changes to such reliance, set out here. HMRC explain when its advice is not binding here.

Claiming VAT incurred overseas

By   20 July 2022
0

A UK VAT registered business is able to recover VAT it incurs in the EU. However, this is not done on the UK VAT return, but rather by a mechanism known as an “13th Directive” claim (Thirteenth Council Directive 86/560/EEC of 17 November 1986).

Via this procedure a UK business reclaims overseas VAT from the tax authority in the country it was incurred. This is different to the Retail Export Scheme.

Who can claim?

Any UK business which has a certificate of status and meets the following conditions:

The conditions

  • the UK business has not undertaken any business which would require it to register for VAT in the country in which the claim relates
  • a business must not have any fixed establishment, seat of economic activity, place of business or other residence (place of belonging) in the country of refund
  • a VAT invoice is obtained
  • the VAT was incurred for goods or services which give rise to the right of deduction (see below)

VAT not claimable

The following rules must be applied to a claim, and some claims are specifically refused:

Partial exemption

A business must apply the appropriate recovery rate for purchases using its partial exemption method.

Non-business expenses

Expenditure incurred in another country which relates to non-business activities is not claimable under the refund scheme.

Non-refundable supplies

VAT on the following supplies cannot be claimed

  • incorrectly invoiced
  • goods purchased which are subsequently exported

Further, the “usual” rules that apply to a UK VAT claim must be followed.

I have summarised what VAT is not claimable in each EU Member State here.

Minimum claim

Each country has a set minimum claim, but it is mainly around the €50 pa figure.

Time limit

Deadlines to request a refund are not standard and vary country to country. However, they are mainly 30 June or 30 September, and the claims are on a calendar year basis year (it is possible to make quarterly claims which have different deadlines).

How to make a claim

Claimants must send an application to the national tax authority in the country where the VAT was incurred.

Unfortunately, since Brexit, the claims procedure is more complex. There is no longer a single portal and the procedure to request refunds is not standard across the EU. A business needs to research the country specific information on VAT using links provided on the EU Taxation site and a claim for each country must be sent using the procedure set out by that country.

Full rules and procedure to follow can be found in Directive 86/560/EEC

Please note: Some countries require that a claim to be filed by a tax representative authorised by the local tax administration.

Time limits for the country of refund to process an application

The country of refund must notify the applicant of its decision to approve or refuse the application within four months of the date they first received the application.

Payment method

The refund will be paid in the country of refund or, at the applicant’s request, in any Member State. In the latter case, any bank charges for the transfer will be deducted by the country of refund from the amount to be paid to the applicant.

Penalties

All countries take a very serious view of incorrect or false applications. Refunds claimed incorrectly on the basis of incorrect or false information can be recovered and penalties and interest may be imposed, and further refund applications suspended.

Claims refused

If the country of refund refuses an application fully or partly it must notify a claimant of the reasons for refusal.

If this happens an appeal against the decision may be made using the appeals procedure of that country.

Interest on delayed applications

Interest may be payable by the country of refund if payment is made after the deadline. 

Claims on UK VAT returns

VAT incurred overseas must not be claimed on a UK VAT return.  If it is, it is liable to an assessment, penalties and interest levied in the UK by HMRC.

VAT: Disclosed and undisclosed agents

By   20 July 2022
0

There has been substantial case law on whether a business acts as agent or principal, the most recent being:

All Answers Limited

Adecco

Lowcost Holidays Ltd

Hotels4U.com Limited 

In this brief article I consider the distinction between disclosed and undisclosed agents and the VAT position of each.

Agent

An agent is a person who has been legally empowered to act on behalf of another entity (a principal). An agent may be employed to represent a client in negotiations and other dealings with third parties under his direction. The agent may be given decision-making authority. The relationship between a principal and agent can be disclosed or undisclosed to a third party. A disclosed agent acts in the name of the principal, whereas an undisclosed agent acts in his own name. 

VAT Treatment

Disclosed Agents

A disclosed agent acts in the name of the principal and the client is aware that they are dealing with an agent of the principal. The relevant supply is made by the principal to the client. The agent does not make the supply to the client, but rather, to (usually) the principal in respect of commission for its services of acting as the “middle-man” in the transaction.

Output tax is due on the full selling price of the goods or services supplied by the principal. The value is not reduced by any amount paid to the agent. The agent will invoice the principal for his services and in most cases the principal will recover this as input tax (subject to the usual rules).

Undisclosed Agents 

The buyer of goods or services will not (usually) know the name of the principal and will deal with the agent in the agent’s own name. The legislation states that ‘where a taxable person acting in his own name but on behalf of another person takes part in a supply of services, he shall be deemed to have received and supplied those services himself’.  

This means that the supply of goods or services by an undisclosed agent is treated as a simultaneous supply to, and by, the agent. The agent is treated as both the purchaser (from the principal) and seller (to the client/customer).

The agent treats the goods as its own purchase – incurring VAT charged by the principal and then declares output tax on the onward sale to the client. The input tax charged by the principal is usually recoverable by the undisclosed agent. In some circumstances, the purchase and sale will have different VAT liabilities, eg; the sale of goods may be a VATable UK supply, but the onward sale could be a zero rated export. Generally, the principal is not put in a less advantageous position by operating through an agent.

Summary

It is sometimes difficult to establish whether an entity acts as agent or principal, and if agent, whether it is in a disclosed or undisclosed capacity. Not only is the VAT treatment different, but the distinction effects where goods or services are deemed to be supplied for VAT purposes. The place of supply rules dictates such matters as VAT registration (UK and overseas) whether (and where) VAT is chargeable and the compliance obligations of the principal and agent.

It is important to analyse the terms of the relevant contracts/agreements between the agent and principal to establish the nature of the relationship. However, it also necessary to consider the commercial reality of transactions between the parties as this may differ from the contract.