Latest from the courts
Can products designed to, errr… stimulate sexual desire be treated as foodstuffs? – Only in VAT do such questions ahem arise eh?
Background
X (the name of the business), sold items in its sex shop which included;
capsules, drops, powders and sprays presented as aphrodisiacs that stimulate
libido. Those products, which are composed essentially of elements of animal or
vegetable origin, were intended for human consumption and were to be taken
orally.
X applied the reduced rate to these products (the rate in
The Netherlands, certain food in the UK is zero rated) treating the sexual
stimulants as foodstuffs.
This was challenged by the tax authorities as it was not considered
that they fell within the definitions of ‘foodstuffs for human consumption’. Assessments
were issued for the difference between the reduced rate and the standard rate.
The case was referred to the ECJ – C-331/19 Staatssecretaris
van Financiën vs X
The Gerechtshof den Haag (Court of Appeal, The Hague, Netherlands) found
in favour of X, ruling that the use of the products in question as aphrodisiacs
did not preclude them from being taxed at the reduced rate applicable to
foodstuffs. This was broadly on the basis that the products were intended to be
consumed orally and were made from ingredients that may be found in foodstuffs.
The VAT Directive contains no definition of the concepts of ‘foodstuffs
for human consumption’ or ‘products normally used to supplement foodstuffs or
as a substitute for foodstuffs, so that is, at the least, unhelpful, although
it was emphasised that the words must be interpreted in accordance with the
usual meaning of them in everyday language.
Decision
It was ruled that any product intended for human consumption which
provides the human body with the nutrients necessary to keep the human body
alive and enable it to function and develop comes within the scope of the
category set out in point 1 of Annex III to the VAT Directive, even
if the consumption of that product also aims to produce other effects.
Further; the nutritional role was a decisive factor for a product to be
classed as a ‘foodstuff for human consumption’/ The question whether that
product has health benefits, its ingestion entails a certain pleasure for the consumer,
or its use is part of a certain social context, is irrelevant. Consequently, the
fact that consumption of that product has positive effects on the libido of the
person ingesting it is irrelevant.
So, aphrodisiacs can be food.
Action
If any business which sell such products which, incidentally, contain
nutrients may have a VAT claim based on this case.