Oils and fats used for animal food is zero-rated, unless it is waste oil from a fish and chip shop – which is standard rated… even if it is used to feed animals.
Oils and fats used for animal food is zero-rated, unless it is waste oil from a fish and chip shop – which is standard rated… even if it is used to feed animals.
Is output tax due on goods that, for various reasons, cannot be sold, or are sold at a discount?
HMRC says that the VAT treatment depends on whether or not there was actually a supply of goods, what happened to them, who was responsible for them at the time and whether a VAT invoice was issued. The value of any supply will also need to recognise any credit given to the customer.
So, as often is the case with the tax, the answer is: “It depends”. So, let’s look at the categories to find out:
Lost goods
This depends on who lost the goods.
Sometimes a business will sell goods to a customer, but they did not receive them because they went astray. This could happen, for example, if goods are lost in the post.
If the customer is responsible for any losses before the goods are delivered, then VAT is due on the full amount of the sale.
If the supplier is responsible for any losses before the goods are delivered, then the way VAT is dealt with will depend on whether an invoice has been issued.
If an invoice has been issued, output tax is due on the amount invoiced, less the value of any credit given to the customer. So, if credit has been given a full refund, no VAT will be due.
If no invoice has been issued, there is no VAT due. This is because nothing has been supplied. It is prudent to make a note in the business records that the goods were lost an no invoice was raised.
Stolen goods
If goods are stolen from a business’ premises no VAT is due – as long as any customer has not been invoiced. HMRC are very likely to examine such circumstances as it is sometimes used as an ‘excuse’ for underdeclarations. Consequently, we always advise businesses to hold as much evidence as possible to support a claim that theft has taken place.
Goods stolen from a supplier’s premises after they have been sold to a customer- If the contract with the customer means that they are responsible for the goods while they are on the supplier’s premises – there has been a supply and output tax is due.
If the customer is not responsible for the goods when they are stolen, then if:
NB: If cash is stolen from a business, this does not reduce the value of output tax on any supply.
Fraud
If goods are lost due to fraud it can be difficult to demonstrate or evidence. To avoid paying output tax on goods lost to a fraud a business is required to:
Damaged goods
Damaged goods may be sold on at a discounted price, or they might have some scrap value. Output tax is due on whatever income is received for the goods sold. If an insurer makes a payment in respect of the damage, no VAT is due on this income.
Destroyed goods
If goods are destroyed such that they cannot be sold, and these are handed over (or what is left of them) to the insurer, no VAT is due on the disposal. Furthermore, there is no output tax due on any money received from the insurer. HMRC will need to see evidence of the insurance claim, and details of any insurance payment, on their next inspection of the business.
Records
Maintaining meticulous records is crucial for VAT compliance and it is very likely that such issues will be examined closely on HMRC inspections. This is because unexpected reductions in output tax will usually trigger enquiries. Input tax claims for the original purchase of the goods will be unaffected, so any mark-up type exercise will flag up the discrepancy.
More on illegal activities here.
VAT Basics
Return boxes explained – what goes where? A general overview.
Box 1 VAT due in the period on sales and other outputs
The amount of VAT due on all goods and services supplied in the period covered by the return. This is output tax. The value of output tax may be affected by VAT:
VAT may also be due on supplies outside the mainstream of a business, eg:
Box 2 VAT due in the period on acquisitions of goods made in Northern Ireland from the EU
Since 1 January 2021, a business is only allowed to make acquisitions on goods brought into Northern Ireland from the EU. For acquisitions, the VAT due on all goods and related costs bought from VAT-registered suppliers in the EU should be included.
Box 3 total VAT due
Show the total VAT due, the total of boxes 1 and 2. This is the total output VAT for the period.
Box 4 VAT reclaimed in the period on purchases and other inputs
Show the total amount of deductible VAT charged on business purchases. This is input tax for the period.
This will include:
Certain VAT paid by a business should not be included in box 4, some examples here.
Adjustments to the amount claimed may be required for
Box 5 net VAT to pay or reclaim
Deduct the smaller from the larger of values in boxes 3 and 4 and enter the difference in box 5.
If the figure in box 3 is more than the figure in box 4, the difference is the amount payable to HMRC. If the figure in box 3 is less than the figure in box 4, HMRC will repay this.
Box 6 total value of sales and all other outputs excluding any VAT
Show the total VAT exclusive value of all business sales and other specific outputs. These will include:
Box 7 total value of purchases and all other inputs excluding any VAT
Show the total net value of expenditure. This will include:
Boxes 8 and 9 only need to be completed goods cross the Northern Ireland border.
Box 8 value of supplies of goods to the EU
For supplies of goods and related costs, excluding any VAT, from Northern Ireland the EU made from 1 January 2021.
Box 9 value of acquisitions of goods from the EU
For acquisitions of goods and related costs, excluding any VAT, from the EU into Northern Ireland from 1 January 2021.
NB: If a business uses one of the following schemes there may be different rules for completing some of the boxes on returns.
The supplies to which the DRC applies are set out here
Under one VAT scheme, zero-rated and exempt supplies are subject to VAT – as are those which are “Outside the scope of UK VAT”.
Which, or course, makes entire sense.
What can be used to make a claim?
It is well known that in order to claim input tax on expenditure a business is required to have a valid tax invoice to support it. But what if there is no VAT invoice? Can HMRC accept any other evidence to support a claim? Well, the answer is yes… sometimes.
HMRC has discretion provided by legislation: VAT Regulations 1995/2518 Reg 29(2). Specifically, the wording most relevant here is “…such other documentary evidence of the charge to VAT as the Commissioners may direct.” Broadly, a business must hold the correct evidence before being able to exercise the right to deduct.
Where claims to deduct VAT are not supported by a valid VAT invoice HMRC staff are required to consider whether there is satisfactory alternative evidence of the taxable supply available to support deduction. HMRC staff should not simply refuse a claim without giving reasonable consideration to such evidence. HMRC has a duty to ensure that taxpayers pay no more tax than is properly due. However, this obligation is balanced against a duty to protect the public revenue.
Full details of tax invoices here.
What HMRC consider
HMRC staff are required to work through the following checklist:
Outcome
If the responses to the above tests are credible, HMRC staff should exercise their discretion to allow the taxpayer to deduct the input tax. Overall, HMRC is required to be satisfied that sufficient evidence is held by the business which demonstrates that VAT has been paid on a taxable supply of goods or services received by that business and which were used by that business for its taxable activities
Challenge HMRC’s decision
A business may only challenge HMRC’s decision not to allow a claim (did not exercise its discretion) if it acted in an unfair or unreasonable way. In these cases, the onus is on the taxpayer to demonstrate that HMRC have been unreasonable in not using the available discretion. This is quite often a difficult thing to do.
Case law
Not surprisingly, there is significant case law on this subject. The most relevant and recent being the Upper Tribunal (UT) cases of James Boyce Scandico Ltdv and Wasteaway Shropshire Limited.
Tips
If possible, always obtain a proper tax invoice from a supplier, and don’t lose it! The level of evidence required when no invoice is held usually depends on the value of the claim. There would be a difference between persuading an inspector that £20 input tax on stationery is recoverable and the claiming of £200,000 VAT on a property purchase is permissible. As always in VAT, if you get it wrong and claim VAT without the appropriate evidence there is likely to be a penalty to pay.
If you, or your clients are in dispute with HMRC on input tax claims, please contact us.
Latest from the courts
The recent Xcel Consult Limited First-Tier Tribunal (FTT) case serves as a reminder on the tight time limits for appealing against VAT penalties and surcharges.
The VAT Act 1994 Section 83G sets out a statutory time limit for bringing appeals in respect of VAT penalties and surcharges of the kind in question in this case. An appeal is to be made to the tribunal before the end of the period of 30 days beginning with the date of the document notifying the decision to which the appeal relates.
Section 83G(6) provides that an appeal may be made after the expiry of the statutory period if the Tribunal gives permission. In deciding whether to give permission to allow the late appeal, the three-stage test set out in Maitland is applied. These tests are:
(1) establish the length of the delay and whether it is serious and/or significant
(2) establish the reason or reasons why the delay occurred
(3) evaluate all the circumstances of the case, using a balancing exercise to assess the merits of the reason(s) given for the delay and the prejudice which would be caused to both parties by granting or refusing permission, and in doing so take into account “the particular importance of the need for litigation to be conducted efficiently and at proportionate cost, and for statutory time limits to be respected”.
Commentary
Our advice is to always respond within the 30 day limit, as relying on an out of time appeal can be risky. If that is not possible, an appeal should be submitted asap to ensure that test 1) above is not a reason to reject a submission.
HMRC interest rates for late payments are to be revised following the Bank of England interest rate cut.
The Bank of England Monetary Policy Committee announced on 6 February 2025 to reduce the Bank of England base rate to 4.5% from 4.75%.
HMRC interest rates are linked to the Bank of England base rate. As a consequence of the change in the base rate, HMRC interest rates for late payment and repayment will reduce.
These changes will come into effect on:
How HMRC interest rates are set
HMRC interest rates are set in legislation and are linked to the Bank of England base rate.
Late payment interest is currently set at base rate plus 2.5%. Repayment interest is set at base rate minus 1%, with a lower limit – or ‘minimum floor’ – of 0.5%.
The differential between late payment interest and repayment interest is in line with the policy of other tax authorities worldwide and compares favourably with commercial practice for interest charged on loans or overdrafts and interest paid on deposits.
Further to our article on HMRC using chatbots, reports have emerged that they are working less than 50% of the time and that the resolution rate is only 21% even once a connection is established.
It is clear that the attempt to move services online has caused significant issues for taxpayers and advisers.
A recent survey by the Association of Chartered Certified Accountants discovered that nearly 9 in 10 business owners (89%) said poor levels of service at HMRC is having a negative impact and causing a ‘huge roadblock’.
This is even more infuriating for people wishing to contact HMRC because the issue has been exacerbated by the restricted access to HMRC telephone helplines and the closure of the VAT registration helpline used by taxpayers and accountants.
Put simply, income which is outside the scope (OSC) of VAT is UK VAT free. It means that either there has been no supply in respect of that income (non-business, or ‘NB’), or if there is, it has a place of supply (POS) which is outside the UK. Although VAT free, OSC is distinct from exempt or zero-rated supplies and has a different impact for the entity involved in NB activities.
So, here I consider the different types of OSC income and how it affects the VAT position of the recipient of such a payment.
Charity
Charities and NFP organisations often receive income from various sources and often receive NB income which is OSC. This income is often donations for which the donor does not receive anything (there is no consideration provided by the charity). An organisation such as a charity that is run on a non-profit-making basis may still be regarded as carrying on a business activity for VAT purposes. This is unaffected by the fact that the activity is performed for the benefit of the community. It is therefore important for a charity to determine whether particular transactions are business or NB activities. This applies both when considering registration (if there is only NB activity a charity cannot be registered and therefore cannot recover any input tax) and after registration. ‘Business’ has a wide meaning for VAT purposes – an activity may still be business if the amount charged does no more than cover the cost to the charity of making the supply or where the charge made is less than cost. If the charity makes no charge at all the activity is unlikely to be considered business. A common area of complexity for charities when considering whether their activities are in the course of business is receipt of grant funding (please see below).
Grants
There is no ‘standard’ VAT treatment of grants. The VAT outcome depends on the precise facts of each specific agreement. The most important test is whether the grantor receives any consideration in return for the payment. It may be that the donor recognises the good work a body does and wishes to contribute (akin to a donation) which is OSC. Alternatively, the recipient of the grant may be obliged to provide something in return (a supply which is not OSC). A helpful way of looking at this is to consider, not what the recipient does with grant money, but what it does for it.
Inter-company charges
Charges between VAT group members are OSC. Moreover, charges between non-VAT-grouped companies may also be OSC. These are commonly called ‘management charges’ and the VAT treatment depends on a number of facts. It is often the case that a management charge is used as a mechanism for transferring “value” from one company to another. If it is done in an arbitrary manner with no written agreement in place, and nothing identifiable is provided the income is likely to be OSC. Otherwise, it is likely to be a taxable supply. What is important is not how a management charge is calculated, but what the supply actually is (if it is one). The calculation, whether based on a simple pro-rata amount between separate subsidiaries, or via a complex mechanism set out in a written agreement has no impact on the VAT treatment. As always in VAT, the basic question is: what is actually provided?
Place of supply not the UK
If the POS is outside the UK, then the resulting payment for that supply is OSC. The POS rules can be complex and care must be taken in identifying the correct country to declare output tax (this may include the use of the OSS). In some instances, the Reverse Charge is applied. Input tax incurred in relation these supplies is recoverable, subject to the normal rules, and this distinguishes this type of supply from some of the others discussed here.
Transfer Of a Going Concern (TOGC)
A TOGC is deemed to be neither a supply of goods nor services, so consequently, it is OSC. Input tax incurred in respect of the costs of making a TOGC are considered an overhead of the business for partial exemption purposes, so it is not automatically disallowed because it relates to a ‘non-supply’.
Supplies by a non-taxable person
Sales by a business person who is not liable to be VAT registered.
Insurance etc
A payment between persons, which is paid under a contract of indemnity, is OSC, because it does not represent consideration for a supply, eg; sums paid under an insurance policy.
Private transactions
These transactions between individuals or gifts received are OSC.
Statutory fees
These are OSC, an example of such fees are: the London congestion charge, MOT testing, some road tolls, and parking fines.
Input tax recovery
VAT incurred on costs directly relating to OSC activities is not input tax and cannot be recovered (there are no de minimis limits). This is separate to partial exemption and a business/NB calculation is required before a partial exemption calculation is carried out, so it is a two-tier exercise. It may be possible to combine these two calculations, but that is an article for another day.
HMRC has issued new guidance on the amount of input tax claimable when an element is attributable to NB activities. If an entity is involved in both business and NB activities, eg; a charity which provides free advice and also has a shop which sells donated goods, it is unable to recover all of the VAT it incurs. VAT attributable to NB activities is not input tax and cannot be reclaimed. Therefore, it is necessary to calculate the quantum of VAT attributable to business and NB activities. That VAT which cannot be directly attributed is called overhead VAT and must be apportioned between business and NB activities. There are many varied ways of doing this as the VAT legislation does not specify any particular method. It is important to consider all of the available alternatives. Examples of these are; income, expenditure, time, floorspace, transaction count etc (similar to those methods available for partial exemption calculations). Any calculation must be fair and reasonable.
Overall
OSC income should not be recognised in the value box of VAT returns and it does not count towards the VAT registration limit. It is likely to negatively affect the recipient’s input tax recovery position. The distinction between business and non-business is crucial and will significantly impact on an entity’s overall VAT position.
Further reading
The following articles consider case law and other relevant business/NB issues:
Lajvér Meliorációs Nonprofit Kft. and Lajvér Csapadékvízrendezési Nonprofit Kft