Category Archives: VAT Claim

Claiming VAT incurred overseas

By Marcus Ward 20 July 2022

A UK VAT registered business is able to recover VAT it incurs in the EU. However, this is not done on the UK VAT return, but rather by a mechanism known as an “13th Directive” claim (Thirteenth Council Directive 86/560/EEC of 17 November 1986).

Via this procedure a UK business reclaims overseas VAT from the tax authority in the country it was incurred. This is different to the Retail Export Scheme.

Who can claim?

Any UK business which has a certificate of status and meets the following conditions:

The conditions

the UK business has not undertaken any business which would require it to register for VAT in the country in which the claim relates
a business must not have any fixed establishment, seat of economic activity, place of business or other residence (place of belonging) in the country of refund
a VAT invoice is obtained
the VAT was incurred for goods or services which give rise to the right of deduction (see below)

VAT not claimable

The following rules must be applied to a claim, and some claims are specifically refused:

Partial exemption

A business must apply the appropriate recovery rate for purchases using its partial exemption method.

Non-business expenses

Expenditure incurred in another country which relates to non-business activities is not claimable under the refund scheme.

Non-refundable supplies

VAT on the following supplies cannot be claimed

incorrectly invoiced
goods purchased which are subsequently exported

Further, the “usual” rules that apply to a UK VAT claim must be followed.

I have summarised what VAT is not claimable in each EU Member State here.

Minimum claim

Each country has a set minimum claim, but it is mainly around the €50 pa figure.

Time limit

Deadlines to request a refund are not standard and vary country to country. However, they are mainly 30 June or 30 September, and the claims are on a calendar year basis year (it is possible to make quarterly claims which have different deadlines).

How to make a claim

Claimants must send an application to the national tax authority in the country where the VAT was incurred.

Unfortunately, since Brexit, the claims procedure is more complex. There is no longer a single portal and the procedure to request refunds is not standard across the EU. A business needs to research the country specific information on VAT using links provided on the EU Taxation site and a claim for each country must be sent using the procedure set out by that country.

Full rules and procedure to follow can be found in Directive 86/560/EEC

Please note: Some countries require that a claim to be filed by a tax representative authorised by the local tax administration.

Time limits for the country of refund to process an application

The country of refund must notify the applicant of its decision to approve or refuse the application within four months of the date they first received the application.

Payment method

The refund will be paid in the country of refund or, at the applicant’s request, in any Member State. In the latter case, any bank charges for the transfer will be deducted by the country of refund from the amount to be paid to the applicant.

Penalties

All countries take a very serious view of incorrect or false applications. Refunds claimed incorrectly on the basis of incorrect or false information can be recovered and penalties and interest may be imposed, and further refund applications suspended.

Claims refused

If the country of refund refuses an application fully or partly it must notify a claimant of the reasons for refusal.

If this happens an appeal against the decision may be made using the appeals procedure of that country.

Interest on delayed applications

Interest may be payable by the country of refund if payment is made after the deadline.

Claims on UK VAT returns

VAT incurred overseas must not be claimed on a UK VAT return. If it is, it is liable to an assessment, penalties and interest levied in the UK by HMRC.

VAT: The Reverse Charge

By Marcus Ward 24 June 2022

Normally, the supplier is the person who must account to the tax authorities for any VAT due on the supply. However, in certain situations, the position is reversed, and it is the customer who must account for any VAT due. Don’t get caught out!

Purchasing services from abroad

These will be obtained free of VAT from an overseas supplier. What is known as the ‘reverse charge’ (RC) procedure must be applied. Where the RC applies, the recipient of the services must act as both the supplier and the recipient of the services. On the same VAT return, the recipient must account for output tax, calculated on the full value of the supply received, and (subject to partial exemption and non-business rules) include the VAT charged as input tax.

The effect of these provisions is that the reverse charge has no net cost to the recipient if he can attribute the input tax to taxable supplies and can therefore reclaim it in full. If he cannot, the effect is to put him in the same position as if had received the supply from a UK supplier rather than from one outside the UK. Thus, creating a level playing field between purchasing from the UK and overseas.

Accounting for VAT and recovery of input tax.

Where the RC procedure applies, the recipient of the services must act as both the supplier and the recipient of the services. On the same VAT return, the recipient must

account for output tax, calculated on the full value of the supply received, in Box 1
(subject to partial exemption and non-business rules) include the VAT stated in box 1 as input tax in Box 4
include the full value of the supply in both Boxes 6 and 7

Value of supply

The value of the deemed supply is to be taken to be the consideration in money for which the services were in fact supplied or, where the consideration did not consist or not wholly consist of money, such amount in money as is equivalent to that consideration. The consideration payable to the overseas supplier for the services excludes UK VAT but includes any taxes levied abroad.

VAT: Motoring costs – A guide

By Marcus Ward 8 April 2022

VAT Basics

Nearly all businesses incur car motoring expenses, so here is a guide to the VAT impact:

Buying a car

A business cannot recover the VAT on a car purchase, unless it:

is a stock in trade of a motor manufacturer or dealer
is a taxi, driving instruction car, or self-drive hire
will be used exclusively for the purposes of your business and would not be made available for the private use of anyone

Leasing a car

If a business leases a ‘qualifying car’ for business purposes it will normally be unable to recover 50% of the VAT charged. The 50% block is to cover the private use of the car.

However, a 100% reclaim is possible if it is to be used for hire with a driver for carrying passengers or providing driving instruction.

The 50% block applies to all the VAT on charges paid for the rental of the car. This includes:

optional services — unless they’re supplied and identified separately from the leasing supply on the tax invoice
excess mileage charge — if it forms part of a supply of leasing but not if it was incurred on an excess mileage charge that forms part of a separate supply of maintenance

Fuel

The options for claiming input tax on road fuel are as follows:

claim 100% of the VAT charged. This is possible if fuel is bought for business motoring only or for both business and private motoring and the appropriate fuel scale charge (see below) is applied on the value of supplies of fuel for private use
use detailed mileage records to separate business mileage from private mileage and only claim for the business element
claim no input tax

Road Fuel Scale Charge

A scale charge is a way of accounting for output tax on road fuel bought by a business for cars which is then put to private use. If a business uses the scale charge, it can recover all the VAT charged on road fuel without having to split mileage between business and private use. The charge is calculated on a flat rate basis according to the carbon dioxide emissions of the car. The charges are set out in the fuel scale charge table.

Mileage records

HMRC calculation example:

Total mileage: 4,290
Business mileage: 3,165
Cost of fuel: £368.
Business mileage: £368 × (3,165 ÷ 4,290) = £271.49
Claimable input tax: £271.49 × VAT fraction = £45.25

Fuel paid for by employees

If a business reimburses its employees for fuel used it can treat the VAT they paid as its input tax. But the business must be able to show that it has reimbursed them for their actual expenditure on the fuel. If fuel bought by employees for business is put into private use, the business must account for output tax on the private use using the scale charges or the value.

Electric vehicles

Details of input tax recovery and output tax due here.

Input tax on repairs

If a vehicle is used for business purposes, there is a 100% reclaim of the VAT charged on repairs and maintenance as long as the business paid for the work and the vehicle is used for some business purposes. It does not matter if the vehicle is used for private motoring or if you have chosen not to reclaim VAT on road fuel (see below).

Other motoring expenses

Input tax incurred on all other business motoring expenses, eg; fleet management charges or parking charges is fully recoverable input tax.

Selling a car

If a car is sold on which input tax was recovered, eg; a driving school car, VAT is due on the full selling price. The supply of these vehicles are cannot be made under the second hand margin scheme.

If a car is sold where VAT was charged on purchase but could not be recovered there is no VAT due on the sale of it. Such a supply is exempt and must be consider in any partial exemption calculation. For most businesses this will not be an issue.

If a business sells a car where VAT was not charged when it was purchased, eg: from a private individual or from a dealer who sold it under the second-hand margin scheme, no VAT will be due unless the sale was at a higher value than the purchase price. In which case VAT will be due under the margin scheme.

NB: The VAT rules for commercial vehicles will differ.

VAT: Bad Debt Relief. The Regency Factors case

By Marcus Ward 7 February 2022

Latest from the courts

In the Regency Factors plc Court Of Appeal (CoA) case the issue was the validity of the appellant’s claim for Bad Debt Relief (BDR) on amounts it had not received after the issue of an invoice.

Technical

BDR is a mechanism which goes some way to protect a business from payment defaulters. Under the normal rules of VAT, a supplier is required to account for output tax, even if the supply has not been paid for (however, the use of cash accounting or certain retail schemes removes the problem of VAT on bad debts from the supplier). The specific relief for unpaid VAT is via the BDR scheme.

A guide to BDR here.

Commentary on the Upper Tribunal (UT) hearing in this case here.

Background

In the CoA case the issue was whether the appellant met the conditions in The VAT General Regulations 1995, Reg 168 for claiming BDR via The VAT Act 1994, section 36.

Regency provided a factoring service to its clients for which it is paid a fee. VAT invoices for those fees were issued to clients when the invoices which are being factored are assigned to Regency for collection.

Regency appealed against a decision of the Upper Tribunal (UT) which dismissed Regency’s appeal against VAT assessments made by HMRC to withdraw BDR which Regency had claimed in its VAT returns.

The UT held that the BDR claim was not valid because

there was no bad debt; and
Regency had failed to comply with the procedural requirements for the making of a claim.

Regency appealed against the decision of the UT on the second point.

Decision

The CoA decided that as Regency’s record keeping was insufficient to support a BDR claim. Specifically, although it did keep the records required by Regulation 168 (2), it did not keep a single VAT BDR account which is required by Regulation 168 (3). The ruling commented that this requirement was a legitimate feature of the scheme as it enables an inspector to check the claim easily. It is not acceptable for a claimant to simply have a pile of unsorted documents which may, or may not, evidence a valid claim.

The court also said that it was possible for HMRC to allow a discretionary claim (clearly, they did not use that discretion in this case) and that the legal requirement was not a barrier to Regency making a proper BDR claim. The appeal was dismissed.

“In short, Regency had the opportunity to prove its claim for bad debt relief in the FTT… but it failed to do so. It is not entitled to a second opportunity”.

Commentary

As always with VAT, accurate record-keeping is essential. As the tax is transaction based, it is vital to keep comprehensive evidence of those transactions and associated payments. Failure to do so may result in:

assessments and penalties
give HMRC the opportunity to refuse otherwise legitimate input tax recovery
refuse other VAT claims (in this case BDR).
confusion and uncertainty which often creates costs in time and other resources, and extended relations with HMRC, which is in no business’ interest.

If Regency had taken “one step further” with its record keeping, BDR would have been paid by HMRC.

VAT Registration

By Marcus Ward 4 January 2022

VAT Basics

A business must register for VAT with HMRC if its VAT taxable turnover is more than £90,000 in a 12 month period.

Taxable Turnover

Taxable turnover means the total value of everything that a business sells that is not exempt or outside the scope of VAT.

Registration is mandatory if turnover exceeds the current registration threshold in a rolling 12-month period. This is not a fixed period like the tax year or the calendar year – at the end of every month a business is required to calculate income (not profit) over the past year.

A business may also register voluntarily, which may be beneficial if it wants to reclaim input tax it has incurred.

Catches

There are some transactions that must be included in the turnover calculation which can easily be missed:

goods a business hired or loaned to customers

business goods used for personal reasons

goods which were bartered, part-exchanged or given as gifts

services a business receives from suppliers in other countries which are subject to a reverse charge

building work over £100,000 a business did for itself

zero-rated items (these are still taxable although no VAT is charged)

Timing

A business must register within 30 days of the end of the month when it exceeded the threshold. The effective date of registration (EDR) is the first day of the second month after a business goes over the threshold.

Future test

A business must mandatorily register for VAT if it expects its VAT taxable turnover to be more than £90,000 in the next 30-day period. This may be because of a new contract or a other known factors.

Registration exception

If a business has a one-off increase in income it can apply for a registration ‘exception’. If its taxable turnover goes over the threshold temporarily it can write to HMRC with evidence showing why the taxable turnover will not exceed the deregistration threshold (currently £88,000 in the next 12 months). HMRC will consider an exception and write confirming if a business will receive one. If not, HMRC will compulsory register the business for VAT.

Transfer of a going concern (TOGC)

If a VAT-registered ongoing business is purchased the buyer must register for VAT from the purchase date. It cannot wait until its turnover exceeds the threshold.

Businesses outside the UK

If a business belongs outside the UK, there is a zero threshold. It must register as soon as it supplies any goods and services to the UK (or if it expects to in the next 30 days).

Late registration

If a business registers late, it must pay the VAT due from when it should have registered (the EDR). Further, it will receive a penalty depending on how much it owes and how late the registration is. The rates based on the VAT due are:

up to 9 months late – 5%
between 9 and 18 months – 10%
over 18 months = 15%.

How to register

A business can register online. By doing this it will register for VAT and create a VAT online account via which it will submit VAT returns.

Between application and receiving a VAT number

During the wait, a business cannot charge or show VAT on its invoices until it receives a VAT number. However, it will still be required to pay the VAT to HMRC for this period. Usually, a business will increase its prices to allow for this and tell its customers why. Once a VAT number is received, the business can then reissue the invoices showing the VAT.

Purchases made before registration

There are time limits for backdating claims for input tax incurred before registration. These are:

four years for goods still on hand at the EDR
six months for services

Once registered

A business’ VAT responsibilities. From the EDR a business must:

charge the right amount of VAT
pay any VAT due to HMRC
submit VAT Returns
keep appropriate VAT records and a VAT account
follow the rules for ‘Making Tax Digital for VAT’
keep business details up to date (there are penalties for failing to inform HMRC of changes)

VAT groups

VAT grouping is a facilitation measure by which two or more entities can be treated as a single taxable person (a single VAT registration). There are pros and cons of grouping set out here.

VAT: Input tax recovery. The Mpala Mufwankolo case

By Marcus Ward 15 November 2021

Latest from the courts

In the First Tier Tribunal (FTT) case of Mr Mufwankolo the dispute was whether the appellant was able to recover VAT charged by the landlord of the property from which he ran his business – a licenced retail outlet on Tottenham High Road.

Background

The landlord had opted to tax the commercial property and charged VAT on the rent. The appellant was a sole proprietor; however, the lease was in the name of Mr Mufwankolo’s wife, and the rent demands showed her name and not that of the sole proprietor. It was contended by the appellant, but not evidenced, that the lease had originally been in both his and his wife’s names, despite his wife being the sole signatory.

The issues

Could the appellant recover input tax?

Did the business receive the supply?
Was there appropriate evidence?

It was clear that the business operated from the relevant property and consequently, in normal circumstances, the rent would be a genuine cost component of the business.

The Decision

The FTT found that there was no entitlement to an input tax claim and the appeal was dismissed. The lease was solely in the wife’s name and the business was the applicant as a sole proprietor. (There was an obvious potential for a partnership and an argument that a partnership was originally intended was advanced. The status of registration was challenged in 2003, but, crucially, not pursued).

It was possible for the property to be sub-let by the wife to the husband, however, this did not affect the VAT treatment as matters stood. Additionally, there was no evidence that the appellant actually paid any of the rent, as this was done by the tenant. There were no VAT invoices addressed to the sole proprietor.

Given the facts, there was no supply to the appellant, so there was no input tax to claim, and the issue of acceptable evidence fell away.

It was a certainty that the appeal could not succeed.

Commentary

There were a number of ways that this VAT cost could have easily been avoided had a little thought been given to the VAT arrangements. An oversight that created an avoidable tax hit.

A helpful guide to input tax considerations here: Care with input tax claims.

Legislation

The VAT Act 1994 Section 3 – Taxable person

The VAT Act 1994 Section 4 – Taxable supply

The VAT Act 1994 Section 24 (1) – Input tax

The VAT Act 1994 Section 24 (6) – Input tax claim evidence

VAT: HMRC to end making payable orders to NETPs

By Marcus Ward 9 November 2021

HMRC will stop issuing payable orders to overseas non-established taxpayers (NETP – taxpayers who are registered for UK VAT but do not have a business address here). The system automatically issued a payable order if a NETP was due a repayment.

Background

HMRC has received notifications and complaints from taxpayers advising that they can no longer cash their payable orders in their country or their bank. The impact of Brexit and COVID19 has seen an increase in banks/countries no longer accepting payable orders. Consequently, HMRC were sending repayments to NETPs with the knowledge they may not be able to cash them.

New Gform

To address this issue HMRC has created a Gform that will enable NETPs to send their bank account information in order that the issue of a payable order can be avoided and a Clearing House Automated Payment System (CHAPS) payment made instead.

Access

HMRC systems do not currently have CHAPS functionality or the ability to store overseas bank information. However, once a NETP has completed the form, which is accessed via the Government Gateway HMRC will set a lock on the taxpayer’s record to prevent the payable order being automatically issued. NETPs will then receive their repayments directly into their bank account without the need to visit their bank to cash a payable order.

Information required

Information requested on the Gform will include:

VAT registration number
address
email address
bank account information
payable order information if necessary

VAT: DIY housebuilders can make more than one claim – The Ellis case

By Marcus Ward 18 October 2021

Latest from the courts

In the First Tier Tribunal (FTT) case of Andrew Ellis and Jane Bromley [2021] TC08277, the issue was whether a person constructing their own house can make more than one claim for VAT incurred.

Background

The DIY Housebuilder’s Scheme enables a DIY housebuilder to recover VAT incurred on the construction of a house in which the constructor will live. Details here.

In this case, the specific issue was whether, despite the HMRC guidance notes on the scheme claim form explicitly stating that only one claim can be made, whether two claims may be submitted and paid by the respondent.

The appellant constructed a house over a period of five years (he was a jobbing builder and the work was generally only undertaken at weekends and holidays). To aid cash flow, an initial claim was made, followed by a second two years later.

The relevant legislation is The VAT Act 1994 section 35.

Decision

The appeal was allowed. The FTT found that HMRC’s rule that only one claim could be made under the DIY housebuilder’s scheme was ultra vires and that multiple claims should be permitted.

The judge stated that “…there is no express indication that only one claim may be made. Like many provisions, section 35 VATA is drafted in the singular. Drafting in the singular is an established technique to assist in clarity and to enable the proposal to be dealt with succinctly. As there is no express indication to the contrary in section 35 VATA, section 6 Interpretation Act 1978 applies to confirm that the reference to “a claim” in section 35 VATA must be read as including “claims”.

Commentary

This is good news for claimants who often must wait a number of years for a house to be built and therefore carry the VAT cost until the end of the project.

This case presumably means that it is possible to make claims as the project progresses and there is no need to wait until completion.

We await comment on this case from HMRC, but it is hoped that clarification will be forthcoming on whether the result of this case will be accepted.

VAT: Are freemasons’ aims philosophical, philanthropic, or civic? The United Grand Lodge case

By Marcus Ward 4 October 2021

Latest from the courts

In the First Tier Tribunal (FTT) case of United Grand Lodge of England (UGLE) the issue was whether subscriptions paid by members of the freemasons are exempt via The VAT Act 1994, Schedule 9, Group 9, section 31, item 1(e) “Subscriptions to trade unions, professional and other public interest bodies” which exempts membership subscriptions paid to a non-profit making organisation which has objects which are of a political, religious, patriotic, philosophical, philanthropic or civic nature.

Background

So, in this case, for the subscriptions to be exempt, freemasonry’s aims must be philosophical, philanthropic, or civic. UGLE submitted input tax claims on the basis that its subscription income was exempt and HMRC declined to make the repayments.

An organisation which has more than one main aim can still come within the exemption if those aims are all listed and described in the legislation. The fact that the organisation has other aims which are not set out in law does not mean that its services to members are not exempt provided that those other aims are not main aims. If, however, the organisation has a number of aims, all equally important, some of which are covered by the exemption, and some of which are not, then the services supplied by the organisation to its members are wholly outside the exemption.

The contentions

The respondents stated that the aims were not UGLE’s sole main aim or aims, and, even if they were, the aims were not in the public domain.

UGLE claimed that its sole main aim was philosophical in nature; or, in the alternative, the main aims, taken together, were of a philosophical, philanthropic, or civic nature and it did not have any other main aims.

Decision

The appeal was dismissed. The judge decided that the supplies made by UGLE in return for subscription payments were properly standard rated.

It was common ground that the motives of the members in joining the organisation are irrelevant.

It was accepted that since 2000 freemasonry has become more outward looking and since then has become more involved in charitable work among those, and for the benefit of those, who are not freemasons or their dependants. That said, the judge was not satisfied that the charitable works of individual freemasons, such as volunteering to give time to a local charity, were undertaken by them as freemasons rather than simply as public-spirited members of the community.

It was found that UGLE did have aims of a philosophical, philanthropic and civic nature (the promotion of all aspects of the practice of freemasonry and charity was central to UGLE’s activities). However, it was not accepted that these were UGLE’s main or primary aims. At least 48% of payments made by UGLE were to freemasons and their dependants and in the FTT’s judgment such support remained one of the main aims of freemasonry and thus of UGLE. The importance of providing support for freemasons and their dependants who are in need is a central tenet of freemasonry – The duty to help other freemasons is clearly set out in the objects of the four central masonic charities. The evidence showed that the provision of relief to freemasons and their dependants was the more important than donations to good causes unconnected with freemasonry.

Civic aims

There was nothing in the evidence which indicates any civic aim. UGLE cannot be said to be an organisation that has aims pertaining to the citizen and the state. Indeed, freemasons are prohibited from discussing matters of religion and politics in lodges.

Consequently, as one of UGLE’s main aims could not be described as philosophical, philanthropic, or civic, its membership subscriptions were standard rated. Making payments to freemasons was more akin to self-insurance, rather than philanthropic in nature.

VAT: Farm in business? The Babylon case

By Marcus Ward 21 September 2021

Latest from the courts

In the Upper Tribunal (UT) case of Babylon Farm Ltd (the farm) the issue was whether the appellant was in business and consequently was able to recover certain input tax.

Background

Yet another case on whether there was any business activity in a company. Please see here, here, here and here for previous cases on this issue. The farm sold hay which it cut from another person’s fields to a connected party. The value of the one-off annual sale was £440 pa. The appellant also contended that it was also undertaking preparatory acts for the new business activities and that it would be able to levy management charges. Another new business activity was the creation of an investment and insurance product.

The farm built a new barn on which it claimed input tax of £19,760.

HMRC considered that no business was being carried on and decided to deregister the farm thus refusing to pay the input tax claim. The farm challenged this decision and contended that taxable supplies were being made, and there was also an intention to make taxable supplies in the future.

Legislation

Paragraph 9 of Schedule 1 of the VAT Act 1994 requires HMRC to be satisfied that a person is either making taxable supplies or is carrying on a business and intends to make such supplies in the course or furtherance of a business in order to be registered for VAT. There are a number of tests set out in case law (mainly The Lord Fisher case) to establish whether a person is in business:

Is the activity a serious undertaking earnestly pursued?
Is the activity an occupation or function, which is actively pursued with reasonable or recognisable continuity?
Does the activity have a certain measure of substance in terms of the quarterly or annual value of taxable supplies made?
Is the activity conducted in a regular manner and on sound and recognised business principles?
Is the activity predominantly concerned with the making of taxable supplies for a consideration?
Are the taxable supplies that are being made of a kind which, subject to differences of detail, are commonly made by those who seek to profit from them?

Decision

The appeal was dismissed. The farm was not in business and could not recover input tax on the costs of the new barn.

The judge stated that he could see no legal basis for the farm to be in business. The hay that the farm sold was taken from the customer’s own land and therefore belonged to him already. It was also noted that no invoices were raised, no payment for the hay had been made for a number of years and the single customer was a director of Babylon Farm Limited so the farm was not operating in an open market. The sale of hay had not been conducted on a basis that followed sound and recognised business principles or on a basis that was predominantly concerned with the making of taxable supplies for consideration. As a consequence, the farm was not operating as a business during the relevant period.

On the intention point; neither of the intended activities had yet resulted in any chargeable services being provided and both were to be carried on through companies that had been formed for these purposes (not the farm). Both businesses remained at a formative stage and neither company has generated any revenue. This was insufficient to retain the VAT registration.

Commentary

The decision was hardly a surprise and one wonders how it reached the UT. HMRC were always going to challenge an input tax claim of that quantum with no output tax (and such a low value of sales which may not have been made in any event).