Category Archives: VAT commentary

VAT: Land and property – “simplification” ahead?

By   19 July 2021
0

HMRC has issued a call for evidence in respect of land exemption. HMRC acknowledges the complexity of the existing VAT rules on land and property and would like to hear views from businesses on the application of the current rules, and whether these rules could be simplified.

The application of VAT on land and property transactions is complicated. A range of different rates and exemptions can apply depending on the facts and circumstances of individual situations and the precise treatment of a transaction or project is often open to interpretation.

Complexity

The paper identifies a number of reasons why this area is extremely complicated:

  • over the years the amount of legislation has increased, and the land VAT exemption now contains fifteen exceptions and twenty-six sets of notes
  • some businesses can be required to make several separate decisions before the VAT liability of their supply can be established. Eg; once a business has established that it is supplying land (not always straightforward) it then has to consider whether that supply falls within one of the exceptions to the exemption. If it does fall within one of the exceptions, it then has to consider a number of conditions to establish whether it is excluded from that exception
  • businesses may spend a disproportionate amount of time and money to establish the correct liability of their land supplies. This can also cause additional burdens for HMRC to assure compliance of these businesses
  • the development of new markets and services that did not exist when VAT was introduced
  • the impact of precedent case law (both UK and EU)
  • the uncertainty of establishing when an exempt supply of land becomes a taxable supply of facilities

The Option to Tax

The option to tax legislation enables a business to tax some supplies of land that would otherwise be treated as exempt from VAT. The usual rationale behind making such a choice is to be able to recover the VAT incurred on costs and overheads of a business, or to meet the conditions of a Transfer of a Going Concern (TOGC).

Suggestions

The document then suggests some ideas for simplification:

  • removing the ability to opt and making all relevant transactions exempt
  • removing the option to tax and making all land and property taxable at a reduced rate
  • making all commercial land and property taxable at the standard rate with an option to exempt

The first suggestion would result in many businesses incurring irrecoverable input tax which would be a direct cost, so this appears very unattractive.

The second seems a better option, but would bring new housing into the VAT net and I doubt that this would play out very well with the public.

The final suggestion would certainly simplify matters but would add VAT costs to entities which cannot recover any/all input tax, eg; charities, financial service providers, insurance companies, education bodies, health and welfare organisations and cultural services.

The document states that “The Government wants UK businesses to operate in the best possible environment and remain both productive and competitive”.

It remains to be seen whether the suggestions above (or other proposals put forward) will achieve this, but removing choices for a business (regardless of whether simplification is actually realised) is rarely a good idea and I wonder if simplification could be reached in other ways. If you have an interest in this area, please respond to this call as input is valuable for all parties.

Responses should be sent by 3 August 2021 by email to landsimplification@hmrc.gov.uk.

VAT: The “business” of shooting – a tale

By   14 July 2021
0

Sometimes one is involved in a dispute which goes to the core of the tax.  This is a case which highlights basic VAT principles, HMRC’s approach to an issue and the lengths to which a taxpayer has to go to defend his position.

Are you sitting comfortably?

A day out in the countryside; striding across beautiful landscape, amongst friends, enjoying each other’s’ company and a bit of sport – can this really be the subject of such intense debate with HMRC? Well, unfortunately this seems to be the case when it comes to the operation of a day’s shooting. In the eyes of the taxman, whether or not a profit or a surplus is achieved, shooting, conducted in the course of furtherance of a business is subject to VAT.

This is not usually an issue which shooting syndicates find themselves having to address; they are not concerned with the ins and outs of what constitutes a business for the purposes of the VAT legislation. However, HMRC was pursuing this issue in earnest and they have a team devoted solely to attacking shoots.

Who is HMRC targeting?

HMRC seem to be focusing on syndicate run shoots which are not registered for VAT but who HMRC believe are operating on business principles. If an organisation is operating as a business then it may be liable to register for VAT if certain income thresholds are exceeded. The shoot will then have to charge output VAT on the supplies it makes.  In my case there would have been a significant assessment plus penalties and interest which could double the past VAT bill.

How is HMRC attacking the issue?

HMRC is looking closely at the specific activities of syndicate shoots in order to build an argument demonstrating that the organisation of the shoot is run on “sound business principles”.  The reason that there is room for debate on this matter is that what constitutes a business is not explicitly defined anywhere in the VAT legislation either in UK or EC law. Rather, the issue has been defined in case law.

The defining case was Lord Fisher, which co-incidentally also concerned a shoot. This case is relied upon throughout the VAT world to give guidance on what constitutes a business – and not just in respect of shoots but for all types of activity.

Anyway, back to this syndicate…

I was involved in a battle lasting four years which concerned a local shoot run for over five decades by a group of friends and which was provided only for the benefit of the syndicate members. The shoot was not open to the common commercial market place or members of the public and the shoot did not advertise. HMRC spent a great deal of time trying to understand the finer details of the running of this shoot and concluded that it was a business

We advised The Shoot to appeal to the VAT Tribunal against HMRC’s decision to levy VAT on its activities.

They key to the syndicate’s defence was to demonstrate that no true business would operate commercially in the way that The Shoot does.  If it did, it would be completely unprofitable and would soon be out of business. To demonstrate this effectively, every aspect of the shoot was examined in detail and compared and contrasted with the way a commercial shoot operates. This involved everything from the lunch arrangements, CVs of the gamekeepers and how beautiful the land is, right through to whether chicks or poults are purchased and whether local deer were sold to the highest bidder. However, the most important factor was the demonstration that the syndicate does not have a profit built in to the cost structure and the amounts that the syndicate members contribute. The syndicate is run on a cost sharing basis and is not “an activity likely to be carried out by a private undertaking on a market, organised within a professional framework and generally performed in the interest of generating a profit.”

It all sounds so simple to those familiar with the industry but unfortunately from a VAT ‘business’ perspective it has been a long, stressful and costly argument for the appellant to make.  A few days before the case was to be heard at the Tribunal, HMRC withdrew their assessment and conceded the case.

HMRC had seen the many witness statements filed by the members of the syndicate waxing lyrical about how this was an age-old hobby run by a few friends and in no way could it be considered a commercial business. They had seen the expert witness report written by a specialist in the field. The distinctions made between commercial and syndicate shooting were made very clear. They had also seen the powerful argument which concluded that the shoot “cannot seriously be suggested to amount to a ‘business’ for the purpose of the VAT code”.

What this means?

Of course this victory over HMRC was a fantastic result for the members of The Shoot, but from a practical point of view quite frustrating in that the case was not heard; denying other entities the benefit of the predicted victory.  Alas, it was one case that HMRC could not afford to lose.

It is therefore likely that HMRC will continue to target other shoots where they think they can ‘win’ or at least not be challenged.

Have you been affected? – What should you do next?

If this makes for frighteningly familiar reading and you or your local syndicate shoot are, or have been, under HMRC investigation then it is vital that you should take professional advice.  As I orchestrated the defence for The Shoot we believe that we are the leading advisers in such matters.

 For completeness, the six tests derived from the Lord Fisher case (and others) are:
  1. Is the activity a serious undertaking earnestly pursued?
  2. Is the activity an occupation or function, which is actively pursued with reasonable or recognisable continuity?
  3. Does the activity have a certain measure of substance in terms of the quarterly or annual value of taxable supplies made?
  4. Is the activity conducted in a regular manner and on sound and recognised business principles?
  5. Is the activity predominantly concerned with the making of taxable supplies for a consideration?
  6. Are the taxable supplies that are being made of a kind which, subject to differences of detail, are commonly made by those who seek to profit from them?

The case of Lajvér Meliorációs Nonprofit Kft. and Lajvér Csapadékvízrendezési Nonprofit Kft is also helpful in looking at what a business is.

VAT: Day-care services by private bodies are taxable

By   22 June 2021
0

Latest from the courts

Following the Supreme Court decisions in Life Services Ltd and The Learning Centre (Romford) Ltd HMRC have published guidance in Revenue & Customs Brief 9 (2021).

NB: This guidance applies to bodies in England and Wales only – Scotland and Northern Ireland have different rules.

The relevant cases concerned the VAT liability of day-care services provided by private bodies to vulnerable adults in England. They confirmed that HMRC’s interpretation of the legislation is correct; that providers of day-care must be charities, public bodies or regulated by the relevant authority (“approved, licensed, registered or exempted from registration by any Minister or other authority pursuant to a provision of a public general Act”) in order to be able to exempt these services.

The legislation is: The VAT Act 1994, Schedule 9, group 7, item 9.

It is understood that there were a significant number of claims stood behind the Supreme Court cases and these will now fail.

HMRC state that providers who have not accounted for VAT on supply of these services must do so with immediate effect.

Commentary

This is a further example of the VAT complexity in the provision of health and welfare services. It has always been an area ripe for disputes and such bodies and their advisers would be prudent to review the tax treatment of their supplies. There are usually two discrete areas of potential problems; whether services are business or non-business, and if business – do they fall within the various exemptions found at Schedule 9, group 7, items 1 to 11.

VAT: New One Stop Shop (OSS) rules from 1 July 2021

By   15 June 2021
0

All you need to know about the new One Stop Shop (OSS)

New VAT rules will be introduced on 1 July 2021, and it is important that businesses and advisers are aware of the impact on transactions from this date. These changes have been introduced to increase the control of tax revenues as it is an area where a significant amount of tax is lost – creating an unfairness for businesses that correctly pay tax. They also aim to provide simplification for suppliers and consumers.  

Who will be affected?

The new rules will impact all businesses that sell products online to consumers (B2C) in the EU, known as: distance sales. It will also affect suppliers of certain designated services and electronic interfaces.

UK online sellers not established anywhere in the EU can use the “Non-Union” version of OSS.

How OSS works

The current position

The current EU VAT rules state that cross-border sales of goods are subject to VAT in the EU Member State (MS) of dispatch. However, there are thresholds; once these sales reach a threshold in the MS of sale, a business is required to VAT register in that MS and ensure compliance and payment of VAT there.

The new rules

All sales will be subject to VAT in the MS of arrival of the goods. The existing thresholds for distance sales of goods (where the supplier is responsible for the transport of the products) within the EU will be replaced by a new EU threshold of €10,000*. To avoid a business having to VAT register in every EU MS into which it supplies goods, online sellers will be able to use the OSS electronic portal. This will enable the seller to account for, and pay, VAT in all EU MS on a single electronic quarterly return in one EU MS.

* As, since Brexit, the UK is no longer an EU MS, one the main differences is that the €10,000 annual turnover threshold for small business does not apply, so an EU VAT registration will be required for any distance sales to the EU. The business will need to nominate any single EU MS to register, submit returns, and make payments. Additionally. As a non-union OSS, depending on the chosen MS’s domestic regulations, a business may be required to appoint a fiscal representative.

Note: Even if a UK business has a turnover below the VAT registration threshold (currently £85,000 pa) so that it need not register here, it will be subject to OSS rules and need to register in an EU MS, this is compulsory.

Supplies covered by OSS

  • distance sales of goods within the EU by suppliers not belonging in that MS
  • supplies of certain B2C services (below) made by a supplier which take place in a MS in which it is not established

Services covered by Non-Union OSS

Examples of supplies of services to customers (a non-exhaustive list) that could be reported under the non-Union scheme are:

  • accommodation services
  • admission to cultural, artistic, sporting, scientific, educational, entertainment or similar events; such as fairs and exhibitions
  • transport services, plus ancillary activities such as; loading, unloading, handling or similar
  • valuation and work on movable tangible property
  • services connected to immovable property
  • hiring of means of transport
  • restaurant and catering services for consumption on board ships, aircraft or trains etc

Electronic interfaces

From 1 July 2021, if an electronic interface, eg; marketplace, platform, etc facilitates distance sales of goods by a non-EU established seller to a buyer in the EU, the electronic interface is considered to be the seller (“deemed supplier” rather than agent) and is liable for the payment of VAT via the OSS.

IOSS

In addition to the OSS, a new scheme covering the import of goods subject to a distance sales transaction and in consignments not exceeding €150 is being introduced to simplify accounting for VAT. This is called the Import One-Stop Shop (IOSS). If the value of the consignment exceeds €150, it will usually be the end customer who will be the importer and will have to pay VAT, and any, customs clearance etc costs.

Note: The VAT exemption at import of small consignments of a value up to €22 will be removed. This means all goods imported in the EU will now be subject to VAT.

VAT rates

Businesses will need to apply the VAT rate of the MS where the goods are dispatched to or where the services are supplied. Information on the VAT rates in the EU is available on the European Commission website.

How to register for the OSS

Each EU MS will have an online OSS portal where businesses can register from 1 April 2021 and can use for transactions made on or after 1 July 2021. The single registration will be valid for all eligible supplies made by online sellers (including electronic interfaces) or supplies facilitated by electronic interfaces.

OSS Requirements

A business that uses the OSS will be required to:

  • apply the VAT rate of the MS to which the goods are shipped
  • collect VAT from the buyer
  • submit a quarterly electronic VAT return
  • make quarterly VAT payments
  • keep records of all OSS supplies for ten years

Summary

The OSS is not compulsory, however, as the alternative is to VAT register in every EU MS where goods are received, it is a simplification in that respect – the previous distance selling rules were cumbersome and antiquated.

Further information

Full details of the OSS and IOSS from the EC here

VAT: Input tax recovery – whether a taxable supply. The Door Specialist case

By   9 June 2021
0

Latest from the courts

In the First Tier Tribunal case of The Door Specialist Limited (TDSL) the issue was whether an HMRC assessment for overclaimed input tax was correct.

Background

The appellant recovered input tax on the import of goods (doors). The company did not sell the doors, but simply gave the goods (no consideration provided) to a separate company called Just Doors (JD).  It was JD who made the sales of the doors to third party customers.  TDSL and JD were under common ownership but no VAT group in place at the relevant time. TDSL was VAT registered as it made separate, unrelated taxable supplies of property rental

Arguments

HMRC contended that as there was no onward taxable supply of the doors by TDSL, no input tax was recoverable per The VAT Act 1994 section 24 (1). TDSL relied on HMRC’s published guidance (Notices 700 and 700/7) in relation to gifts and proposed that it would be proper to assess for output tax on the “supply” to JD rather than denying the input tax claim.  

Issues

The issues may therefore be summarised as whether;

  • the relevant goods were used for the purpose of any economic activity by TDSL
  • the doors could be treated as business gifts as contended by the applicant such that the input tax was recoverable.

Further cases on economic activity/business here, here and here

Decision

It was decided that as there was no direct and immediate link between the purchase of the goods and any onward taxable supply in the course of business or economic activity by TDSL (as required by the outcome of the cases of BAA Ltd JDI International Leasing Ltd) the disallowance of the input tax was appropriate. The advancement of the business gifts contention did not assist the taxpayer as this was not an economic activity in itself. The appeal was therefore dismissed.

 Commentary

A clear example of not considering the VAT implications when carrying out transactions. This tax cost could have easily been avoided if TDSL had sold the doors to JD. As both parties were fully taxable, there would have been no VAT hit. Business gifts and promotional activities are also often a complex area of VAT and as one former colleague once remarked “If you have a marketing department you have a VAT issue”.

VAT due on the charging of electric vehicles

By   1 June 2021
0

As a result of enquiries from businesses and trade representatives, HMRC has announced that output tax is due on electric vehicle (EV) charging.

The use of EV charging points is becoming more common in public places. HMRC has clarified the rules in specific cases, and confirm:

Output tax

Supplies of EV charging through charging points in public places are charged at the standard rate of VAT. There is no exemption or relief .

NB: There is a reduced rate of VAT for supplies of small quantities of electricity, known as ‘de minimis’. However, the de minimis provision only applies if the supply of electricity is all of the following:

  • ongoing
  • to a person’s house or building
  • less than 1,000 kilowatt hours a month

Consequently, the de minimis provision does not apply to supplies of EV charging as this is done at charging points in public places, eg; car parks, petrol stations and on-street parking, and not to a person’s house or building.

Input tax

A business may recover the input tax incurred in charging its EVs if all of the following apply:

  • it is a sole proprietor
  • you charge your EV vehicle at home
  • the EV is used for business purposes (an apportionment must be made between business and private use)

If an employee charges an EV (which is used for business) at home (s)he cannot recover the input tax as the supply is made to the employee and not to the business.

If an employee charges an employer’s EV (for both business and private use) at the employer’s premises the employee will need to record the business and private mileage. Recovery of the full amount of VAT for the supply of electricity used to charge the EV is permitted (including the electricity for private use). However, output tax will be due on the charge on the amount for private use. Alternatively, a business may recover VAT on only the business element.

VAT Schemes Guide – Alternative ways of accounting for tax

By   17 May 2021
0

There are a number of VAT Schemes which are designed to simplify accounting for the tax.  They may save a business money, reduce complexity, avoid the need for certain documentation and reduce the time needed to deal with VAT.  Some schemes may be used in combination with others, although I recommend that checks should be made first.

It is important to compare the use of each scheme to standard VAT accounting to establish whether a business will benefit.  Some schemes are compulsory and there are particular pitfalls for certain businesses using certain schemes.

I thought that it would be useful to consider the schemes all in one place and look at their features and pros and cons.

These schemes reviewed here are:

  • Cash Accounting Scheme
  • Annual Accounting Scheme
  • Flat Rate Scheme
  • Margin schemes for second-hand goods
  • Global Accounting
  • VAT schemes for retailers

Cash Accounting Scheme

Normally, VAT returns are based on the tax point (usually the VAT invoice date) for sales and purchases. This may mean a business having to pay HMRC the VAT due on sales that its customers have not yet paid for.

The VAT cash accounting scheme instead bases reporting on payment dates, both for purchases and sales. A business will need to ensure its records include payment dates.

A business is only eligible for the Cash Accounting Scheme if its estimated taxable turnover is no more than £1.35m, and can then remain in the scheme as long as it remains below £1.6m.

Advantages

  • Usually beneficial for cash flow especially if its customers are slow paying
  • Output tax is not payable at all if a business has a bad debt

Disadvantages

  • Is generally not beneficial for a repayment business (one which reclaims more VAT than it pays, eg; an exporter or supplier of zero rated goods or services)
  • Not usually beneficial if a business purchases significant amounts of goods or services on credit

Annual Accounting Scheme

The Annual Accounting Scheme allows a business to pay VAT on account, in either nine monthly or three quarterly payments. These instalments are based on VAT paid in the previous year. It is then required to complete a single, annual VAT return which is used to calculate any balance owed by the business or due from HMRC.

A business is eligible for the scheme if its estimated taxable turnover is no more than £1.35m and is permitted to remain in the scheme as long as it remains below £1.6m.

Advantages

  • Reduces paperwork as only the need to complete one return instead of four (Although it does not remove the requirement to keep all the normal VAT records and accounts)
  • Improves management of cash flow

Disadvantages

  • Not suitable for repayment businesses as they would only receive one repayment at the end of the year
  • If turnover decreases, the interim payments may be higher than under standard accounting

Flat Rate Scheme

The Flat Rate Scheme is designed to assist smaller businesses reduce the amount of time and complexity required for VAT accounting. The Flat Rate Scheme removes the need to calculate the VAT on every transaction. Instead, a business pays a flat rate percentage of its VAT inclusive turnover. The percentage paid is less than the standard VAT rate because it recognises the fact that no input tax can be claimed on purchases. The flat rate percentage used is dependent on a business’ trade sector.

A business is eligible for this scheme if its estimated taxable turnover in the next year will not exceed £150,000. Once using the scheme, a business is permitted to continue using it until its income exceeds £230,000.

If eligible, a business may combine the Flat Rate Scheme with the Annual Accounting Schemes, additionally, there is an option to effectively use a cash basis so there is no need to use the Cash Accounting Scheme. New rules regarding ” limited cost traders” mean that the scheme has become less attractive.

Advantages

  • Depending on trade sector and circumstances may result in a real VAT saving
  • Simplified record keeping; no requirement to separate out gross, VAT and net in accounts
  • Fewer rules; no issues with input tax a business can and cannot recover on purchases
  • Certainty of knowing how much of income is payable to HMRC

Disadvantages

  • No reclaim of input tax incurred on purchases
  • Limited cost traders impact
  • If a business buys a significant amount from VAT registered businesses, it is likely to result in more VAT due
  • Likely to be unattractive for businesses making zero-rated or exempt sales because output tax would also apply to this hitherto VAT free income
  • Low turnover limit

Margin Scheme for Second Hand Goods

A business normally accounts for output tax on the full value of its taxable supplies and reclaims input tax on its purchases. However, if a business deals in second-hand goods, works of art, antiques or collectibles it may use a Margin Scheme. This scheme enables a business to account for VAT only on the difference between the purchase and selling price of an item; the margin. It is not possible to reclaim input tax on the purchase of an item and there will be no output tax if no profit is achieved. There is a special margin schemes for auctioneers. A variation of the Margin Scheme is considered below.

Advantages

  • Usually beneficial if buying from (non-VAT registered) members of the public
  • Purchaser will not see a VAT charge
  • Although no input tax claimable on purchases of scheme items, VAT may be claimed in the usual way on overheads and other fees etc

Disadvantages

  • Record keeping requirements are demanding and closely checked, eg; stock records and invoices which are required for both purchases and sales
  • Cannot be used for items purchased on a VAT invoice
  • Can be complex and create a cost if goods exported
  • Although no VAT due on sales if a loss is made, there is no set-off of the loss

Global Accounting

The problem with the Second Hand Goods Scheme is that full details of each individual item purchased and sold has to be recorded. Global Accounting is an optional, simplified variation of the Second Hand Margin Scheme. It differs from the standard Margin Scheme in that rather than accounting for the margin achieved on the sale of each individual item, output tax is calculated on the margin achieved between the total purchases and total sales in a particular accounting period.

Advantages

  • Simplified version of the Margin Scheme
  • Record keeping requirements reduced
  • Losses made on sales reduce VAT payable
  • Beneficial for businesses which buy and sell bulk volume, low value eligible goods

Disadvantages

  • Cannot be used for; aircraft, boats, caravans, horses or motor vehicles
  • Similar to Margin Scheme disadvantages apart from loss set off

VAT Schemes for Retailers

It is usually difficult for retailers to issue an invoice for each sale made, so various retail schemes have been designed to simplify VAT. The appropriate scheme for a business depends on whether its retail turnover (excluding VAT) is; below £1m, between £1m and £130m and higher.

Smaller businesses may be able to use a retail scheme with Cash Accounting and Annual Accounting but it cannot combine a Retail Scheme with the Flat Rate Scheme.  However, retailers may choose to use the Flat Rate Scheme instead of a Retail Scheme.

Using standard VAT accounting, a VAT registered business must record the VAT on each sale. However, via a Retail Scheme, it calculates the value of its total VAT taxable sales for a period, eg; a day, and the proportions of that total that are taxable at different rates of VAT; standard, reduced and zero.

According to the scheme a business uses it then applies the appropriate VAT fraction to that sales figure to calculate the output tax due. A business may only use the Retail Scheme for retail sales and must use the standard accounting procedures for other supplies.  It must still issue a VAT invoice to any VAT registered customer who requests one.  It is a requirement of any scheme choice that HMRC must consider it fair and reasonable.

Examples of Retail Schemes

  • Apportionment
  • Direct calculation
  • The point of sale scheme

There are special arrangements for caterers, retail pharmacists and florists.

Advantages

  • No requirement to issue an invoice for each sale
  • Most schemes are relatively simple to administer once set up. Technology assists in a helpful way with EPOS systems
  • Simplifies record keeping

Disadvantages

  • It is usual for each line sold to need to be coded correctly for VAT liability
  • Smaller businesses without state of the art technology may be at a disadvantage
  • Time and resources required to set up and maintain systems
  • In some cases the calculation depends on staff “pressing the right button”
  • Often complex calculations and record keeping
  • Very precise and complicated rules
  • Lack of understanding by a number of  inspectors
  • Complexity increases the risk of misdeclaration

Overall

As may be seen, there are a lot of choices for a business to consider, especially a start-up.  Choosing a scheme which is inappropriate may result in VAT overpayment and a lot of unneeded record keeping and administration.  There are real savings to be made by using a beneficial scheme, both in terms of VAT payable and staff time.

We are happy to review a business’ circumstances and calculate what schemes would produce the best outcome.

Please contact us if you require further information.

VAT Single and Multiple Supplies

By   11 May 2021
0

Accounting for VAT can be problematic when the supply of goods and services consist of multiple components. In such cases it is necessary to consider whether each component of the supply should be assessed independently or whether the components should be dealt with as one.

Precise treatment is not specifically addressed in UK or European Law and instead a decision is made based upon a review of the essential features of the transaction. For instance, a meal on an airplane is a normal feature of the zero rated travel provided and is not considered a separate standard rated supply to the travel itself. Conversely a meal on a river cruise is a separate supply to that of the zero rated cruise itself and as such is a separate standard rated supply.

A single price is not therefore a decisive indicator of a single supply. Instead what needs to be considered is whether there is just one principal supply or several distinct independent supplies that are provided.

Through the development of case law and HMRC guidance the following situations have been clarified. I have written about the most important, recent cases here, here, here, here and here.

The 50% rule

If a distinct supply represents 50% or more of the overall cost it can not be considered ancillary to the principal supply. In such cases an apportionment will usually be required.

Postal charges

VAT on postage follows the treatment of VAT on the main supply. For example, for mail order items the postage on book is zero rated, whereas the postage on a printer is standard rated.

There are however situations where postage is treated as a separate supply to the goods if, for example, the postage is not expected and is an additional request by the customer.

Subscriptions

If there is one particular reason for the subscription then the fee is considered to be one single supply. If there are separate reasons for the subscription then the fee should be proportioned accordingly and the appropriate VAT treatment should be applied to each element of the supply.

Printed matter

Usually books, newspapers, magazines and music are zero rated whilst items seen as stationery such as membership cards and notebooks are standard rated. For materials supplied with items that can be used independently then there are two supplies, for example a film supplied with a magazine.

A package test can also be applied, where if there are more zero rated items then standard rated items the entire package becomes zero rated, or vice versa.

Two part tariffs

If there are two payments relating to a single supply, the two payments are treated as one and the VAT treatment follows that of the one supply.

Supplies involving land

Services provided on land tend to be viewed as one complete supply. The land aspect is not usually a separate service that the customer receives and instead allows the main service to be provided.

One instance where this may not apply is service charges, which may need to be apportioned if they contain independent supplies such as rent and cleaning. Independent supplies are made if the customer can choose which of the services they would like.

Summary

Card Protection Plan Ltd has become a landmark case in determining the VAT treatment for single and multiple supplies. In this case the ECJ ruled that standard rated handling charges were not distinct from the supply of exempt insurance. It was noted that ‘a supply that comprises a single service from an economic point of view should not be artificially split’. Notably many subsequent court decisions have since followed this outcome thereby suggesting a general lean towards viewing cases as single supplies where there are reasonable grounds to do so.