Category Archives: VAT commentary

VAT: New gov.uk EORI tool

By   21 January 2021
0

Gov.uk has provided a new tool to check a business’ EORI number. (This used to be an EC resource now not available due to Brexit).

A guide to EORI here

A business may need to demonstrate to HMRC that it has carried out proper due diligence in certain cases.

Contact

If you have queries, or would like to obtain specific EORI advice, contact the HMRC EORI team using the online form

Access

Who has access to an EORI number?

The general public can access limited data, When a business is notified of its EORI number, it will be asked whether it objects to this data being published on the site.

VAT: New HMRC guidance for using international post and merchandise in baggage

By   19 January 2021
0

HMRC has published two new sets of guidance for international post users and importing merchandise in baggage. The changes are mainly due to Brexit.

International post users

HMRC has published new guidance for international post users.  

The notice explains what happens when a business imports or exports goods by post through Royal Mail or Parcelforce Worldwide.

The arrangements set out in the notice do not apply when a full declaration on a single administrative document (SAD – Form C88) is required.

The information about sending a package overseas has been updated. This relates to the new need to compete a customs declaration for goods sent to the EU.

Bringing commercial goods into Great Britain in baggage

The guidance covers commercial goods (also known as Merchandise in Baggage) which will be used, or sold by a business, where: 

  • a commercial transport operator does not carry them for a business
  • a person has travelled to GB carrying goods either:
    • in accompanied baggage
    • in a small vehicle that can carry up to no more than 9 people and weighing 3.5 tonnes or less

A person must declare all commercial goods. There is no duty-free allowance for goods brought into GB to sell or use in a business.

My guide to importing and exporting post Brexit here.

VAT: Brexit outcomes – retailers

By   19 January 2021
0

I been asked many times about the VAT position of UK residents buying goods online (and also by more traditional methods) so I thought a brief overview would be helpful.

It has been reported in the media that some overseas retailers have stopped selling to UK customers. This is a commercial decision and is not necessarily solely due to Brexit (although, clearly that hasn’t helped).

What has changed?

Pre Brexit, under the Distance Selling rules, VAT at the rate applicable in the seller’s country would be chargeable by overseas suppliers to UK recipients. This was in the same way as a domestic sale. There were then thresholds which, when breached, resulted in the seller registering in the customer’s country, but these were rarely exceeded by small or SME businesses. The Distance Selling rules still apply to EU Member States, but not the UK.

As the UK is now a ”third country” sales to the UK from the EU which were previously intra-community sales are now imports. From 1 January 2021, sellers of goods B2C (to UK individuals) with a value below £135 – so called low value consignments are required to VAT register in the UK – more details here.  Clearly, many businesses are loath to do this hence their refusal to sell to UK customers. This change is not a result of Brexit but was a measure to level the playing field between EU and non-EU supplies (the latter often escaping the tax completely). From 1 July 2021 similar rules will apply to UK businesses selling to individuals in the EU, although there is likely to be a simplification measure; the so-called One Stop Shop (OSS).

Additionally, UK customers are usually responsible for the new post-Brexit import of goods, so there may be unexpected new VAT, duty and courier costs when buying certain goods from EU countries. This is similar to buying goods from any other country in the world.

It would appear that there will be a reduction in cross-border trade (in both directions) with the UK, and that is without factoring in shipping issues and delays at new borders.

VAT: Unjust enrichment. The Deluxe case

By   13 January 2021
0

Latest from the courts

In the Deluxe Property Holdings Limited High Court case (Deluxe) the issue was whether a VAT claim needed to be passed back to the supplier after a correction – whether the unjust enrichment applied.

Background

Deluxe employed SCL Construction Limited (SCL) to carry out building works. SCL raised invoices in respect of the construction of student accommodation at 20%. It was, however, common ground that the works were in fact zero-rated. SCL recovered the overcharged VAT from HMRC via a VAT Act 1994 Section 80 claim. SCL undertook to repay the amount of VAT to Deluxe via section 10 of VAT Notice 700/45. Without such written reimbursement undertaking, HMRC would have been entitled to refuse the claim. SCL did not make the payment to Deluxe.

Issue

The issue between the parties was whether:

  • SCL holds the accounting credit obtained from HMRC on trust for Deluxe, or;
  • the claim is only in debt, in which case SCL sought to set-off such the claim against other monies that it alleges are owed by Deluxe

Decision

The court ruled that SCL had undertaken to reimburse its customer all of the amount credited by HMRC without any deduction, for whatever purpose. Further, SCL had undertaken that it could not use the credit for any other purpose. It was a payment made by HMRC for the sole and express purpose of allowing SCL to reimburse the mistakenly charged VAT to Deluxe and was clearly intended to restrict SCL’s freedom of disposal so that the credit was to be exclusively used for the stated purpose without set-off.

Although SCL gave its undertaking to HMRC rather than to Deluxe to pass on the money, it held the repayment on trust for Deluxe and gave rise to a Quistclose Trust*

Additionally, a constructive trust arose because it would be unacceptable for SCL to derive a benefit of the VAT repayment.

The court found that SCL has acted in breach of trust and is liable as trustee to restore the trust fund and transfer to Deluxe the balance of the trust property without offsetting it against amounts that it claimed it was owed by Deluxe.

Commentary

This is a logical and expected decision and the reasoning is helpful for similar disputes.

*  A trust may arise where one person, A, advances money to another, B, on the understanding that B is not to have the free disposal of the money and that it may only be applied for the purpose stated by A. The effect of the trust is to reserve in A the beneficial interest in the money, so providing him with some proprietary security for his advance.

VAT: Tour Operators’ Margin Scheme (TOMS) – changes ahead?

By   12 January 2021
0

TOMS is complex, time consuming, potentially costly and a major headache for tour operators. It does aim to simplify VAT accounting as it avoids businesses having to VAT register in every EU Member State in which it provides services.

But, are there changes ahead? The European Commission has published a Factual summary report which looks at TOMS. The consultation was to gather evidence in order to evaluate the scheme in terms of ;

  • does it remain effective
  • to what extent existing rules remain relevant and aligned with stakeholders’ needs
  • identification of potential distortions of competition
  • the regulatory costs and benefits for businesses taxed under the scheme

Since Brexit, HMRC have stated that TOMS still applies in the UK, but supplies in the EU which were previously VATable were now zero rated. The result is that only supplies in the UK are subject to VAT on the margin achieved. The future is unclear however. There is no longer a level playing field between the UK and other EU countries as UK operators’ have an advantage. The potential outcomes(to my mind) are:

  • the position remains the same
  • UK operators will be required to VAT register in every Member State it sells holidays to (or at least some)
  • the above report will address the issues (but will not be binding on the UK

The rules of TOMS are not currently fully harmonised and there are variations in the way EU Member States treat non-EU travel companies (such as the UK now). There are also differences in the services which are, and are not, covered by TOMS. Watch this space…

VAT: Fiscal representation in the UK

By   12 January 2021
0

As Brexit is all completely finished * * hollow laugh * * I look at what overseas businesses operating in the UK need to know in respect of compliance.

What is fiscal representation?

It is a safeguard for the authorities responsible for VAT in the EU (and UK). If it is not possible to collect tax from the taxable person, they can go to the representative who is usually jointly and severally responsible for the debt.

Each EU Member State has its own rules on representatives, but here I look at what overseas businesses need to do in the UK, and what the responsibilities are for a business acting in such a role. A representative must meet a set of tests to ensure that it is fit and proper in order for it to be allowed to act in a representative capacity.

In most cases, overseas businesses with no place of belonging in the UK register as a Non-Established Taxable Person (NETP).

Choices

If a business is a NETP, it will have a choice in how it registers and accounts for VAT in the UK (although in certain circumstances, HMRC have the power to direct a business appoint a tax representative).

Deal with UK VAT itself

In most cases an overseas business can deal with VAT without third party assistance. However, it must be able to:

  • register for VAT at the correct time
  • keep a record of everything it buys and sells in the UK
  • keep all the records needed to complete its VAT Return
  • produce records and accounts to HMRC for inspection
  • keep a note of all VAT paid and charged for each period covered by the return
  • pay the right amount of tax on time

Tax representative

A NETP may appoint a tax representative who:

  • must keep its principal’s VAT records and accounts and account for UK VAT on its behalf
  • is jointly and severally liable for any VAT debts the NETP incurs

A NETP is obliged to provide all of the information required to fulfil its obligations.

Tax Agent

A NETP may appoint a tax agent to act on its behalf. Such an arrangement will be subject to whatever contractual agreement the NETP and the agent decide. The significant difference to a tax representative is that HMRC cannot hold the agent responsible for any of the NETP’s VAT debts. This is clearly a better position for a UK business acting on behalf of a NETP. HMRC can decide not to deal with any particular agent appointed. Also, in some circumstances, if HMRC think it is necessary, it may still insist that a tax representative is appointed – this is usually in cases where there is a risk to the revenue. Additionally, HMRC can ask for a financial security.

As with the appointment of tax representatives a NETP:

  • may only appoint one person at a time to act as its agent (although an agent may act for more than one principal)
  • must still complete the appropriate form to apply for registration
  • HMRC require a NETP’s authority before it can deal with an agent
  • Needs to give the agent enough information to allow them to keep the VAT account, make returns and pay VAT

It is possible to appoint an employee to act as a VAT agent.

Penalties

As is to be expected, get any of the above wrong and there are penalties!

VAT – The Capital Goods Scheme

By   8 January 2021
0

A brief guide to the Capital Goods Scheme (CGS)

If a business acquires or creates a capital asset it may be required to adjust the amount of VAT it reclaims. This mechanism is called the CGS and it requires a business to spread the initial input tax claimed over a number of years. If a business’ taxable use of the asset increases it is permitted to reclaim more of the original VAT and if the proportion of the taxable supplies decreases it will be required to repay some of the input tax initially claimed. The use of the CGS is mandatory. 

How the CGS works

Normally, VAT recovery is based on the initial use of an asset at the time of purchase (a one-off claim). The CGS works by applying a longer period during which the initial recovery may be adjusted if there are changes in the use of the asset. Practically, the CGS will only apply in situations where there is exempt or non-business use of the asset. A business using an asset for fully taxable purposes will be covered by the scheme, but it is likely that full recovery up front will be possible with no subsequent adjustments required. This will be the position if, say, a standard rated property is purchased, the option to tax taken, and the building let to a third party. The CGS looks at how capital items have been used in the business over a number of intervals (usually, but not always; years).  It adjusts both for taxable versus exempt use and for business versus non business use over the lifetime of the asset. Example; a business buys a yacht that is hired out (business use) and it is also used privately by a director (non-business use). However, a more common example is a business buying a property and occupying it while its trade includes making some exempt supplies. 

Which businesses does it affect?

Purchasers of certain commercial property, owners of property who carry out significant refurbishment or carry out civil engineering work, purchasers of computer hardware, aircraft, ships, and other vessels over a certain monetary value who incur VAT on the cost.  (As the CGS considers the recovery of input tax, only VAT bearing assets are covered by it).

Assets not covered by the scheme

The CGS does not apply if a business;

  • acquires an asset solely for resale
  • spends money on assets that it acquired solely for resale
  • acquires assets, or spends money on assets that are used solely for non-business purposes.

Limits for capital goods

Included in the CGS are:

  • Land, property purchases – £250,000 or over
  • Refurbishment or civil engineering works costing £250,000 or over
  • Computer hardware costing £50,000 or over (single items, not networks)
  • From 2011, aircraft, ships, and other vessels costing £50,000 or more.

Assets below these (net of VAT) limits are excluded from the CGS.

The adjustment periods

  • Five intervals for computers
  • Five intervals for ships and aircraft
  • Ten intervals for all other capital items

Changes in your business circumstances

Certain changes to a business during a CGS period will impact on the treatment of its capital assets. These changes include:

  • leaving or joining a VAT group
  • cancelling your VAT registration
  • buying or selling your business
  • transferring a business as a going concern (TOGC)
  • selling an asset during the adjustment period

Specific advice should be sought in these circumstances.

Examples

  1. A retailer purchases a brand new property to carry on its fully taxable business for £1 million plus £200,000 VAT. It is therefore above the CGS limit of £250,000. The business recovers all of the input tax on its next return. It carries on its business for five years, at which time it decides to move to a bigger premises. It rents the building to a third party after moving out without opting to tax. Under the CGS it will, broadly, have to repay £100,000 of the initial input tax claimed.  This is because the use in the ten year adjustment period has been 50% taxable (retail sales) for the first five years and 50% exempt (rent of the property for the subsequent five years).
  2. A company purchases a helicopter for £150,000 plus VAT of £30,000. It uses the aircraft 40% of the time for hiring to third parties (taxable) and 60% for the private use of the director (non-business).  The company reclaims input tax of £12,000 on its next return. Subsequently, at the next interval, taxable use increases to 50%. It may then make an adjustment to increase the original claim: VAT on the purchase £30,000 divided by the number of adjustment periods for the asset (five) and then adjusting the result for the increase in business use: £30,000 / 5 = 6000 50% – 40% = £600 additional claim

Danger areas

  • Overlooking CGS at time of purchase or the onset of building works
  • Not recognising a change of use
  • Selling CGS as part of a TOGC
  • Failing to make required CGS adjustments at the appropriate time
  • Overlooking the option to tax when renting or selling a CGS property asset
  • Sale during adjustment period (not a TOGC)
  • Complexities re; first period adjustments and pre-VAT registration matters
  • Interaction between CGS and partial exemption calculations

Summary

There is a lot of misunderstanding about the CGS and in certain circumstances it can produce complexity and increased record keeping requirements.  There are also a lot of situations where overlooking the impact of the CGS or applying the rules incorrectly can be very costly. However, it does produce a fairer result than a once and for all claim, and when its subtleties are understood, it quite often provides a helpful planning tool.

VAT stats

By   17 December 2020
0

HMRC has published the official VAT statistics for 2019/20

The headlines are:

  • Total VAT receipts in 2019-20 decreased by 1.5% from the previous financial year. There was a downward impact on receipts from the VAT deferral measure which took effect from 20 March 2020.
  • The Wholesale and Retail sector continued to be the largest contributor to net home VAT liabilities.
  • 62% of total net home VAT declared was paid by traders with an annual turnover greater than £10 million.
  • Incorporated companies accounted for the largest share of the VAT population and annual taxable turnover. This group accounted for 72% of traders, and 91% of annual taxable turnover in 2019-20.
  • Sole proprietors were the second largest group in terms of VAT population; this group accounted for 16% of VAT traders. However, the annual taxable turnover declared by this group only accounted for 1% of the total for 2019-20.
  • The Professional, Scientific and technical activities sector increased by £860 million (5%), the largest year-on-year change.
  • The Real Estate Activities sector decreased by £530 million (12%) and the Construction sector decreased by £160 million (3%) year-on-year, although both sectors remain in the top ten sectors in terms of contribution to VAT liabilities.
  • 46.7% of traders declared annual turnover below the VAT registration threshold.
  • More than half of net home VAT payments are accounted for by traders in the top 0.5% in 2019-20.

VAT – How to apply for a non-statutory clearance

By   16 December 2020
0

One would think that it would be a relatively straightforward matter to write to HMRC to obtain a ruling (non-stat clearance) on a matter. Surely a taxpayer ought to be able to set out the issue, describe the transaction, provide a tax analysis and ask HMRC whether they consider the proposed VAT treatment appropriate. Well, of course, it is not as simple as that (this is VAT after all).

So, what are the issues and what hurdles must be cleared before HMRC engage with a written query?

Checklist

First, there is a checklist which a business must consider and include in a non-stat clearance. Inter alia, this list includes:

  • Information about the transaction(s)
  • The reasons why the business is undertaking the transaction
  • The relevant facts about the transaction, set out chronologically as transaction steps,
  • The answer sought – set out your view of the tax consequences of the transaction
  • Any details that are contingent, eg; on future events or the consent of others
  • Information about commercial background
  • Explain the significance of the tax result in achieving the desired outcome
  • Explain why you chose this form of transaction over another that could achieve the same commercial result, where you have considered alternative forms
  • Information about legal points
  • Outline the specific legislation at issue
  • Why you believe the application of the legislation is open to possible different interpretations, summary of those different interpretations, and why the tax consequences are uncertain, including reference to our published guidance or to case law
  • Any legal advice you have already received, and you are content to disclose
  • Details of how you intend to use the clearance, such as for public documents
  • Information about the disclosure of a tax avoidance scheme that covers all or part of the transaction

Failure to address any items on the checklist usually means no determination will be forthcoming.

An applicant must also set out what HMRC guidance (including internal guidance) legislation, case law and other information has been considered. We find it helpful to reproduce the full checklist (as HMRC advise) and provide a comprehensive response to each point in order to avoid a straightforward refusal to respond.

Genuine uncertainty

One of the main reasons HMRC refuses to provide a non-stat clearance is that it considers that there is no genuine uncertainty; in other words, “go and look at the guidance”. This is very unhelpful after time and effort, and fees cost has gone into the application. The fact that an application is required to set out what guidance etc has been considered, and why it is ambiguous in the relevant circumstances does not seem to carry very much weight. I find it is unhelpful to say, “if it wasn’t uncertain, we wouldn’t be writing to you”! We recommend that a full explanation of the genuine uncertainty is provided to forestall such a HMRC refusal to reply.

Chances

Experience insists that it is difficult to obtain a non-stat clearance which is of any value. Quite often, HMRC will reply saying that their letter is not a non-stat clearance, but then go on to address (at least) some of the issues. This sometimes provides a degree of comfort. An approach that I sometimes adopt is to say, “we believe this to be the correct VAT treatment, and one we will apply to the transaction unless you advise otherwise with reasons”. This sometimes creates a reaction.

HMRC guidance

Details of obtaining a non-stat clearance here.

Address

I find that applications are looked at quicker if they are emailed: nonstatutoryclearanceteam.hmrc@hmrc.gsi.gov.uk. However, there is a 2mb size limit which is often unhelpful. If emailing, an applicant should state that you confirm that you understand and accept the risks involved in using email (otherwise this can cause delays).

Postal address

HM Revenue & Customs, Non-Statutory Clearance Team, S0563. 5th Floor, Saxon House, 1 Causeway Lane, Leicester , LE1 4AA

What HMRC will not rule on

  • Incomplete information
  • When there is no genuine uncertainty
  • When they consider it planning advice, or approval of a planning arrangements
  • HMRC believes that the intention is to avoid tax
  • There is a statutory clearance applicable to the transaction
  • Whether activities constitute a business
  • Whether a transaction represents a Transfer Of a Going Concern (TOGC).

Reliance

Even if a business does obtain a determination, is it possible to rely on it? The answer is no (well, not always). I consider this here.

Summary

It is understandable that a business wants certainty on a transaction, and it ought to be able to rely on HMRC for confirmation of its own analysis, but obtaining such an opinion is fraught with difficulties, frustrations and (genuine) uncertainty. It seems that HMRC will go to lengths to avoid giving a decision, but they are not reticent in penalising a taxpayer once a business has made a decision, applied it, and HMRC subsequently disagree with the VAT analysis.

A wholly unacceptable situation.