So that’s what it’s called….. From HMRC guidance – “For the purposes of establishing the place of supply of services, stallion nominations (The right to nominate a mare to be covered by a stallion in one breeding season) and the covering of mares is treated as ‘work carried out on goods’.”
VAT Basics
Consideration – background
There is no definition of consideration in legislation. The meaning was originally taken from contract law, but after the European Court of Justice ruled that the term is to be given the Community meaning and is not to be variously interpreted by Member States the UK adopted that approach.
The expression “consideration” means everything received in return for the supply of goods or the provision of services, including incidental expenses (packing, transport, insurance etc). Consideration is a payment for the supply of goods or services. It is usually a payment in money, but can also be of a “non-monetary” nature, such as goods or services supplied in return.
The phrase “in return for the supply” is interpreted to mean that there must be a direct link between the supply and the consideration.
Therefore, in order that a supply for a consideration can be made, there must be at least two parties and a written or oral agreement between them under which something is done or supplied for the consideration. There is a direct link between the supply and the consideration because the supplier expects something in return for his supply and would not fulfil his obligation unless he thought that payment would be forthcoming.
Profit
It is important to recognise that the concept of consideration and profit are wholly different, and the fact that a business makes no profit on a supply does not mean that there is no consideration for it. Whether payment yields a profit or loss is immaterial and has no bearing on whether or not it is consideration for VAT purposes.
Importance
If consideration is not recognised, or undervalued, a business can expect HMRC assessments and penalties. Overstating consideration will result in an overpayment of tax.
if there is no consideration, there is no supply.
Consideration hallmarks
Consequently, if the provision of goods or services is incapable of being expressed in money, it is not consideration and is outside the scope of VAT.
Indicators of no consideration
Valuation of consideration
This may seem obvious, but as the amount of case law demonstrates, this is not always the case. The starting point is:
Monetary consideration
Monetary consideration includes cash and payment by cheque, credit card, bank transfer, contactless payment, deduction from pay, etc. This is set out in The VAT Act 1994, section 19(2).
Non-monetary consideration
Non-monetary consideration includes goods or services supplied as payment, for example in a “barter” (including part exchange) agreement. Services provided include the giving up of a right, refraining from doing something, agreeing to suffer some loss etc in return for the supply. At first sight these may appear to be merely conditions of an agreement, but are in fact consideration for a supply. If the supply is for a consideration not consisting or not wholly consisting of money, its value shall be taken to be such amount in money as, with the addition of the VAT chargeable, is equivalent to the consideration. Where a supply of any goods or services is not the only matter to which a consideration in money relates, the supply is deemed to be for such part of the consideration as is properly attributable to it.
In determining the taxable amount, the only advantages received by a supplier that are relevant are those obtained in return for making the supply should be recognised. Non-monetary consideration has the value of the alternative monetary payment that would normally have been given for the supply.
What is not consideration
Donations
If a monetary donation is freely given, it is not consideration for any supply and so is outside the scope of VAT. In this situation, the donation has to be unconditional, and the following points dictate whether this is the case.
Donations must be contrasted to sponsorship.
It is necessary to distinguish between donations and sponsorship payments. Whereas a donation means the donor does not expect anything in return, sponsorship involves the sponsor receiving identifiable benefits. These benefits may include advertising, publicity or use of facilities and any sponsorship payment is within the scope of VAT.
Open Market Value
The VAT Act 1994, section 19 (5) states that “…the open market value of a supply of goods or services shall be taken to be the amount that would fall to be taken as its value …if the supply were for such consideration in money as would be payable by a person standing in no such relationship with any person as would affect that consideration”.
Difficult areas
Commonly, areas which give rise to VAT consideration problems include, but are not limited to:
Further reading
For purposes of research or interest, the following cases on consideration are worth reading:
Staatssecretaries van Financien v Cooperatieve Aardapplenbewarr-plaats ((1981) ECR 445; (1981) – The Dutch Potato case for ease!
BAZ Bausystem Gmbh v Finanzamt Munchen Fur Korperschaften
Apple & Pear Development Council (APDC), (ECJ (1988) STC 221; (1988)2 CMLR 394)
Tolsma C-16/93 (1994 STC 509)
I have looked at the Default Surcharge regime in detail here but as statistics show more business to be in default (which is probably accurately attributable, inter alia, to the pandemic) I consider how a penalty may be mitigated, by the provision of a “Reasonable Excuse”. HMRC has updated its internal guidance on Reasonable Excuse this month.
Specifically: HMRC state that “…where a person has not been able to meet an obligation on time due to the impact of COVID-19, HMRC will usually accept that they will have a reasonable excuse.”
What is a Default Surcharge?
The Default Surcharge is a civil penalty issued by HMRC to encourage businesses to submit their VAT returns and pay the tax due on time.
A default occurs if HMRC has not received your return and all the VAT due by the due date. The relevant date is the date that cleared funds reach HMRC’s bank account. If the due date is not a working day, payment must be received on the last preceding working day.
More on late returns here and on late payments here.
New rules forthcoming
It is noted that there is a new regime for penalties, details here although these changes have been delayed until 1 January 2023
Reasonable Excuse
If a business has a reasonable excuse for failing to pay on time, and it remedies this failure without unreasonable delay after the excuse ends, it will not be liable to a surcharge. The onus is on a business to satisfy HMRC that it has a Reasonable Excuse.
Definition
There’s no statutory definition of Reasonable Excuse and it will depend on the particular circumstances of a case. A Reasonable Excuse is something that prevented the business meeting a tax obligation on time which it took reasonable care to meet. There is a great deal of case law on this particular issue. Please contact us should there be doubt about a Reasonable Excuse.
What may count as a Reasonable Excuse?
HMRC give the following examples:
This list is not exhaustive.
What is NOT a reasonable excuse
Statute identifies two specific situations that are not a reasonable excuse:
There can be exceptions to these two exclusions. For example, an insufficiency of funds may be a reasonable excuse where the insufficiency is a result of events outside the person’s control.
HMRC also states that these situations would not normally be accepted, on their own, as a reasonable excuse:
Facts
HMRC will establish what facts the business believes gave rise to a Reasonable Excuse. The facts may include:
Case Law
Although not a VAT issue, in the Upper Tribunal (UT) case of Christine Perrin [2018] UKUT 156 [TC], the judge provided guidance on how the Tribunal should approach a Reasonable Excuse defence. There are four steps:
Appeal
If HMRC refuse to accept an advance of a Reasonable Excuse and the Default Surcharge is maintained, there are two potential remedies:
If a business disagrees with a decision that it is liable to a surcharge or how the amount of surcharge has been calculated, it is possible to:
If you ask for a review of a case, a business will be required to write to HMRC within 30 days of the date the Surcharge Liability Notice Extension (SLNE) was sent. The letter should give the reasons why a business disagrees with the decision.
We are able to assist with all disputes with HMRC and have an enviable record of succeeding in having Default Surcharges removed.
HMRC has issued updated guidance for businesses which need to check whether an entity which stores goods in the UK on its behalf is registered with the Fulfilment House Due Diligence Scheme (FHDDS).
The published list is alphabetical order by company name.
The list should be used if you are a business that is not established in the EU to see if the business that stores your goods in the UK is registered with the FHDDS.
If your business is outsourcing or considering outsourcing its fulfilment operations, then the fulfilment house you are using or intending to use of must be legally accredited by HMRC to do so.
Businesses that must be registered
Businesses are required to be registered if it stores any goods where all of the following apply:
It is illegal to operate outside of the scheme and any fulfilment company found doing so will be prevented operating a fulfilment business and may be subject to a £10,000 penalty and a criminal conviction.
Latest from the courts
In the Regency Factors plc Court Of Appeal (CoA) case the issue was the validity of the appellant’s claim for Bad Debt Relief (BDR) on amounts it had not received after the issue of an invoice.
Technical
BDR is a mechanism which goes some way to protect a business from payment defaulters. Under the normal rules of VAT, a supplier is required to account for output tax, even if the supply has not been paid for (however, the use of cash accounting or certain retail schemes removes the problem of VAT on bad debts from the supplier). The specific relief for unpaid VAT is via the BDR scheme.
A guide to BDR here.
Commentary on the Upper Tribunal (UT) hearing in this case here.
Background
In the CoA case the issue was whether the appellant met the conditions in The VAT General Regulations 1995, Reg 168 for claiming BDR via The VAT Act 1994, section 36.
Regency provided a factoring service to its clients for which it is paid a fee. VAT invoices for those fees were issued to clients when the invoices which are being factored are assigned to Regency for collection.
Regency appealed against a decision of the Upper Tribunal (UT) which dismissed Regency’s appeal against VAT assessments made by HMRC to withdraw BDR which Regency had claimed in its VAT returns.
The UT held that the BDR claim was not valid because
Regency appealed against the decision of the UT on the second point.
Decision
The CoA decided that as Regency’s record keeping was insufficient to support a BDR claim. Specifically, although it did keep the records required by Regulation 168 (2), it did not keep a single VAT BDR account which is required by Regulation 168 (3). The ruling commented that this requirement was a legitimate feature of the scheme as it enables an inspector to check the claim easily. It is not acceptable for a claimant to simply have a pile of unsorted documents which may, or may not, evidence a valid claim.
The court also said that it was possible for HMRC to allow a discretionary claim (clearly, they did not use that discretion in this case) and that the legal requirement was not a barrier to Regency making a proper BDR claim. The appeal was dismissed.
“In short, Regency had the opportunity to prove its claim for bad debt relief in the FTT… but it failed to do so. It is not entitled to a second opportunity”.
Commentary
As always with VAT, accurate record-keeping is essential. As the tax is transaction based, it is vital to keep comprehensive evidence of those transactions and associated payments. Failure to do so may result in:
If Regency had taken “one step further” with its record keeping, BDR would have been paid by HMRC.
The new system for the way penalties and interest is charged due to be introduced on 1 April this year has been deferred to 1 January 2023.
The new points-based regime has been delayed to allow HMRC to implement the necessary IT changes.
I wonder if that represents a reasonable excuse for HMRC being late…
VAT Basics
A business must register for VAT with HMRC if its VAT taxable turnover is more than £90,000 in a 12 month period.
Taxable Turnover
Taxable turnover means the total value of everything that a business sells that is not exempt or outside the scope of VAT.
Registration is mandatory if turnover exceeds the current registration threshold in a rolling 12-month period. This is not a fixed period like the tax year or the calendar year – at the end of every month a business is required to calculate income (not profit) over the past year.
A business may also register voluntarily, which may be beneficial if it wants to reclaim input tax it has incurred.
Catches
There are some transactions that must be included in the turnover calculation which can easily be missed:
Timing
A business must register within 30 days of the end of the month when it exceeded the threshold. The effective date of registration (EDR) is the first day of the second month after a business goes over the threshold.
Future test
A business must mandatorily register for VAT if it expects its VAT taxable turnover to be more than £90,000 in the next 30-day period. This may be because of a new contract or a other known factors.
Registration exception
If a business has a one-off increase in income it can apply for a registration ‘exception’. If its taxable turnover goes over the threshold temporarily it can write to HMRC with evidence showing why the taxable turnover will not exceed the deregistration threshold (currently £88,000 in the next 12 months). HMRC will consider an exception and write confirming if a business will receive one. If not, HMRC will compulsory register the business for VAT.
Transfer of a going concern (TOGC)
If a VAT-registered ongoing business is purchased the buyer must register for VAT from the purchase date. It cannot wait until its turnover exceeds the threshold.
Businesses outside the UK
If a business belongs outside the UK, there is a zero threshold. It must register as soon as it supplies any goods and services to the UK (or if it expects to in the next 30 days).
Late registration
If a business registers late, it must pay the VAT due from when it should have registered (the EDR). Further, it will receive a penalty depending on how much it owes and how late the registration is. The rates based on the VAT due are:
How to register
A business can register online. By doing this it will register for VAT and create a VAT online account via which it will submit VAT returns.
Between application and receiving a VAT number
During the wait, a business cannot charge or show VAT on its invoices until it receives a VAT number. However, it will still be required to pay the VAT to HMRC for this period. Usually, a business will increase its prices to allow for this and tell its customers why. Once a VAT number is received, the business can then reissue the invoices showing the VAT.
Purchases made before registration
There are time limits for backdating claims for input tax incurred before registration. These are:
Once registered
A business’ VAT responsibilities. From the EDR a business must:
VAT groups
VAT grouping is a facilitation measure by which two or more entities can be treated as a single taxable person (a single VAT registration). There are pros and cons of grouping set out here.
Further to my article on the new changes from next year, HMRC has published information on the rules of origin for trade between the UK and EU.
The Bulletin covers the rules of origin and the forthcoming changes to the requirement for supplier declarations to support proof of origin.
Latest from the courts
Further to my article on the Supreme Court case, Uber went to the High Court seeking to challenge this decision, but the High Court has now upheld it.
This means it is very likely that Uber will be required to charge VAT on its supplies as the court found that taxi firms make contracts directly with their customers because Uber drivers should be treated as workers not contractors. This means that Uber make to supply of taxi services to the fare and not the individual drivers.
The High Court agreed with the Supreme Court and stated that: “… in order to operate lawfully under the Private Hire Vehicles (London) Act 1998 a licensed operator who accepts a booking from a passenger is required to enter as principal into a contractual obligation with the passenger to provide the journey which is the subject of the booking.”
A spokesperson for Uber said: “Every private hire operator in London will be impacted by this decision, and should comply with the verdict in full.”
Although not a VAT case itself, this decision is the latest in a long list of VAT agent/principal cases, the most important being:
It is crucial that businesses review their position if there is any doubt at all whether agent status applies to their business model.
Latest from the courts
In the Upper Tribunal (UT) case of Greenspace Limited the issue was whether insulated roof panels were “energy-saving materials” per VAT Act 1994, sect 29A, Schedule 7A, group 2, items 1 and 2 and thus liable at the reduced rate of 5%. Or rather at the standard rate of 20% on the basis that they were a supply of a roof itself.
Background
The appellant supplied and installed roof panels for conservatories which comprised a layer of close-cell extruded polystyrene foam (Styrofoam) around 71mm thick. The Styrofoam was covered with a thin aluminium layer and a protective powder coating which are together around 2mm thick. The supplies were made to residential customers and the panels were fitted onto their pre-existing conservatory roofs. The Panels were slotted into place on the existing roof structure and Greenspace did not replace its customers’ existing roof framework when doing this; the struts and glazing bars that supported the previous glass or polycarbonate panels were left in place. Consequently, the Panels were not self-supporting and could only be used if the customer already had an existing conservatory roof structure.
The decision
The First-tier Tribunal (FTT) decided in 2020 that the panels were not “insulation for a roof” but were a new roof in their own right, and that the appellant’s supplies did not therefore qualify for the reduced rate of VAT (unlike insulation that could be separately attached to a roof, the panels actually formed the roof).
The UT dismissed the new appeal and found that the FTT had not been obliged to compare the roof after Greenspace had installed its panels to the original roof. The frame that was retained could not itself be described as a roof, and the provision of the Thermotec panels which made the conservatory weatherproof as well as insulating it could properly be categorised as the provision of a new roof.
One of Greenspace’s grounds of appeal was that the FTT decision was vitiated by the assumption that because the panels took the form of roof coverings, they were necessarily incapable of constituting “insulation for … roofs”. The appellant argued that as this was a flawed assumption (that Greenspace’s supplies “must” be treated as something more than insulation) the decision should be set aside. This contention was rejected by the UT judge.
Commentary
A fine distinction is often required to be made to establish the correct VAT treatment of a supply. In this case a degree of semantics was required to determine whether the panels were energy-saving materials (even when they certainly saved energy). On such small things turned the assessment of £2.6 million here. It always pays to double check VAT treatments rather than making assumptions.