Tag Archives: indirect-tax

VAT: Is a car wash a car park? The RK Fuels Ltd case

By   26 April 2021
0

Latest from the courts

More on car parking.

In the RK Fuels Ltd First Tier Tribunal (FTT) case, the issue was whether the lease of an area of the supplier’s petrol station to a business operating a car wash was an exempt right over land or whether it was excluded from the exemption because it was a car park (the ‘grant of facilities for parking a vehicle’ VAT Act Schedule 9, Grp. 1, Item [1] [h]) and was therefore standard rated.

Background

Although the tenant operated a car wash (and not a car park) and this was a permitted use under the commercial use agreement, the car wash was located on land used as a car park.

The appellant contended that the car park was rented to carry out the business of car washing, and this is clearly stated in the lease agreement. It is not rented as a car park to park cars. Furthermore, a VAT inspection was carried out by HMRC and the point about the rental income being exempt was raised and accepted by HMRC.

HMRC relied on, inter alia, the fact that the relevant part of the lease stated that “the landlord agrees to rent to the tenant the car park. The car park will be used for only the following permitted use (the Permitted use): as a car wash business. Neither the car park nor any part of the premises will be used at any time during the terms of this lease by the tenant for any purpose other than the permitted use.” And the fact that the appellant was permitted an alternative use of the car park to run a car wash does not cause the area to cease to be a car park, nor does it mean that it cannot be used as a car park. There is a need for cars to be parked on the land whilst waiting to be washed, dried, and cleaned. Without the ability to park a car on the land, the permitted use could not occur.

Decision

The appeal was dismissed. The judge found that a grant of facilities for parking vehicles was made, either expressly or by necessary implication and so was standard rated. Further, the occupation of the car park under the terms of the lease agreement is a means to enable the car wash facility to operate. The site for parking is any place where a motor vehicle may be parked. It was also found that the fact that a person may not leave a vehicle does not render a vehicle any less parked.

The fact that the land was referred to as a “car park” consistently throughout the lease agreement was always going to be a problem for the appellant.

The court went on to consider whether a licence over land had been granted. It is a long-standing principle that a central characteristic of a licence over land is the right to exclude others. As the tenant had no right to exclude others from the relevant land (because, as an example given; customers of the petrol station could park there to visit the shop) there was no exempt supply of the right over land.

Commentary

There were other subsidiary issues, namely on whether an option to tax had been made but this was redundant considering the court’s decision on the substantive point. The decision was unsurprising even considering the guidance set out in VAT Notice 742 para 4.3:

 “When a supply is of land rather than parking facilities 

If you grant an interest in, or right over or licence to occupy land in the following circumstances, your supply will be exempted, unless you have opted to tax… 

·         letting of land or buildings where any reference to parking a vehicle is incidental to the main use..”

Even if the argument could be made that the parking was incidental, as the decision was that there was not an interest in, or right over or licence to occupy land the ancillary use point fell away.

Another nail in the coffin of the appeal was that the court found that the decision in the Fareham Borough Council [2014] TC04129 (which found that the right to operate was not an exempt right over land) applied in this case.

Care should be taken when analysing the VAT treatment of a lease. It is tempting to consider that if there is a lease, and it is of land, it is sufficient to merit exemption, but this case demonstrates that further consideration must always be given.

VAT: Treatment of transactions involving cryptoassets. New guidance

By   8 April 2021
0

Further to my articles on cryptoassets and Bitcoin HMRC have published an updated Cryptoassets Manual CRYPTO40000 which sets out its interpretation of trading in cryptocurrencies.

It covers:

  • economic activity
  • supplies of tokens
  • exchanges
  • exemption
  • value
  • case law
  • betting and gaming
  • other taxes; CGT, CT, CTCG, Income Tax, NIC and Stamp Taxes

Any business dealing in any way with cryptoassets needs to understand the VAT and other tax implications of services to, and by it.

VAT: Exporting and importing businesses -prepare for Brexit

By   8 December 2020
0

New rules from 1 January 2021.

GOV.UK has published new guidance from the Department for International Trade.

The guidance sets out what a business will need to do 1 January 2021. It will be updated if anything changes.

It covers:

The UK Global Tariff

Find a commodity code

Check tariffs

Trade agreements

Exporting to and importing from the EU

Exporting to and importing from non-EU countries

Import controls and customs

Trade remedies

All business with goods crossing the new border will need to understand and prepare for the changes.

VAT: Changes to services post Brexit

By   18 November 2020
0

As we know, the UK will leave the EU on 1 January 2021. A lot of articles have, understandably, focussed on the movement of goods between the UK and the EU, however, there will be significant changes for suppliers and consumers of services. Some of these will be beneficial, and some, charitably, will be a royal pain.

In this article I have tried to summarise the most important changes. Compared to supplies of goods, the changes to services are more certain, so businesses can make preparations with more confidence.

The changes to services

  • Currently, B2B supplies of services to EU recipients are generally UK VAT free (the customer accounts for VAT via a reverse charge). However, currently, for most B2C supplies UK VAT is chargeable. From next year, there is no need to distinguish between B2B and B2C supplies of services to EU recipients – all will be UK VAT free.  Also, there will no longer be the need to differentiate EU and outside the EU customers. A UK business making such supplies will no longer be required to obtain its customer’s VAT number and quote this on the relevant invoice. All that is required is that there is evidence that the recipient belongs outside the UK. I understand that HMRC has announced that VATA 1994, Sch4A para 16 will be amended to bring the EU in line with the rest of the world (well, in VAT terms!)
  • There will be no significant change to, inter alia; land, admission to events, digital and telecoms services which have special rules and fall outside the general VAT rule. Digital services (MOSS) changes slightly and are considered here.

NB: UK businesses will still be required to apply the reverse charge to services received from the EU as these will be VAT free when purchased.

  • Reclaiming VAT incurred in the EU. Currently, a singe claim is submitted to HMRC for all VAT incurred in other Member States. This way of claiming will change post Brexit. A business will be required to submit a claim to each individual EU country in which it has suffered VAT. Broadly, this will be what is known as an EU Thirteenth Directive claim. These need to be done in the language of the relevant country and on specific forms. There will, inevitably be different rules for; deadlines, amounts claimable, methods of claim, information required and procedures. Experience insists that there will be a lot more red tape, rejections and hassle. Good luck!
  • For various reasons, it is likely that more UK businesses will be required to VAT register in the EU. This may be via legal requirements, or commercial planning. As an example, a UK business supplying, say, telecoms services, may be required to register in a country where the supply is consumed (the so-called use and enjoyment rules). Each country has its own rules and some may apply the reverse charge procedure, but businesses supplying:
    • telecommunications services
    • broadcasting services
    • electronically supplied services (for business customers)
    • hired goods
    • hired means of transport
    • insurance repair services

will need to check the requirements of each Member State to which it makes supplies. Also, businesses in the EU making such supplies in the UK are likely to be required to register here.

  • UK businesses suppling financial services (FS) to customers in the EU will benefit from the post Brexit changes. Currently FS providers to recipients outside the EU are able to recover attributable input tax. Similar services received in the UK and the rest of the EU are deemed to be exempt and there is no input tax recovery (for partial exemption see here), From 1 January 2021 as the UK will be a third country (third country refers to any country outside the EU, and in this case outside its economic structures – the single market and the customs union) so any FS supplied to EU recipients will qualify as “specified supplies” such that attributable input tax will be reclaimable. The legislation here: Value Added Tax (Input Tax) (Specified Supplies) (EU Exit) (No. 2) Regulations 2019. So, some rare good news. Full details of FS input recovery here and HMRC guidance here.
  • It is likely that a UK business which is required or chooses to VAT register in an EU Member State will need to appoint either a formal agent or a fiscal representative. This requirement varies between EU countries, so a business will need to check the rules in each country.  This will add complexity and costs. A fiscal representative is jointly liable for any VAT debts and penalties, so most entities acting as representatives will require a bank guarantee or similar to cover its exposure.
  • EU businesses supplying certain services in the UK. There may be an increased requirement for overseas businesses to VAT register in the UK, regardless of whether they have a place of belonging here. Any EU businesses in this position requiring advice please contact me.
  • TOMS. The Tour Operators’ Margin Scheme (details here) is an EU-wide arrangement which, broadly, simplifies VAT for tour operators. This is an area which remains uncertain. It is possible that the UK will negotiate a Brexit which does not disturb TOMS (increasingly unlikely I would say). But in a no-deal Brexit the government has announced that UK tour operators can continue to apply TOMS to UK holidays. However, supplies of holidays outside the UK will not be subject to VAT. This will put UK tour operators at an apparent advantage compared to EU competitors. However, it is likely that they will soon be required to VAT register in every EU country in which it sells holidays. Watch this space.

Commentary

A mixed bag of changes to businesses supplying services. It is crucial for all suppliers of services to the EU to review their position and put plans in action sooner rather than later. If you, or your clients, are unsure about these changes, or would like specific advice, please contact me. I can also offer a review of a business to advise on what planning is required, or beneficial. It is important to get this right as there could be significant penalties, back tax and other unwanted outcomes.

VAT: Is the supply of football pitches an exempt right over land? The Netbusters case.

By   11 November 2020
0

Latest from the courts.

In the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) case of Netbusters (UK) Limited the issue was whether the supply was the standard rated provision of sporting facilities, or an exempt right over land.

Background

Netbusters organised football and netball leagues and provided the playing facilities (artificial pitches for football and courts for netball). The hire of the facilities was for a defined period of time and no other party had the right to access the pitches during those times. The hire could be a block, or one-off booking. The appellant contended that the supplies were exempt via VAT Act 1994, Sch 9, Group 1 – “The grant of any interest in or right over land or of any licence to occupy land…”  However, item 1 Note (para m) excludes the “the grant of facilities for playing any sport or participating in any physical recreation” in which case they become standard rated. To add complexity, Note 16 overrides the exception for sporting facilities (so they are exempt) if the grant of the facilities is for:

“(a) a continuous period of use exceeding 24 hours; or

(b) a series of 10 or more periods, whether or not exceeding 24 hours in total, where the following conditions are satisfied—

(i) each period is in respect of the same activity carried on at the same place;

(ii) the interval between each period is not less than one day and not more than 14 days;

(iii) consideration is payable by reference to the whole series and is evidenced by written agreement;

(iv) the grantee has exclusive use of the facilities; and

(v) the grantee is a school, a club, an association or an organisation representing affiliated clubs or constituent associations.”

I have a simplified flowchart which may assist if you, or your clients, need to look at these types of supplies further.

Another issue was whether Netbusters’ league/tournament management services which were, in principle, available independently of pitch hire, but in practice rarely were provided in that way, were separate supplies or composite. There was a single price payable for both pitch hire and league management services.

The appellant contended that its supplies were exempt via VAT Act 1994, Sch 9, Group 1 or that Revenue and Customs Brief 8 (2014): sports leagues, is applicable which states “HMRC accepts that the decision of the FTT is applicable to all traders who operate in circumstances akin to Goals Soccer Centres plc. This includes traders who hire the pitches from third parties such as local authorities, schools and clubs…”

HMRC argued that there was no intention to create a tenancy and the agreements between the parties did not provide for exclusive use of the premises, so the supplies fell to be standard rated.

Decision

The appeal was allowed; the supply was a singe exempt supply because the objective character of the supplies were properly categorised as the granting of interests in, rights over or licenses to occupy land. It was found to be significant Netbusters (or its customers) had the ability to exclude others from the pitches during the period of the matches.

It was therefore unnecessary to consider whether Netbusters’ supplies grants of facilities satisfy all the conditions set out in Note 16 (although the FTT were disinclined to do this anyway as a consequence of the way respondent prepared its case).

Commentary

The issue of the nature sporting rights has a long and acrimonious history both in the UK and EU courts. Any business providing similar services are advised to review the VAT treatment applied.

VAT: Education and catering – University Of Southampton Students’ Union case

By   6 November 2020
0

Latest from the courts

In the University Of Southampton Students’ Union (USSU) First Tier Tribunal (FTT) case the issue was the VAT treatment of supplies of hot food and coffee; whether the appellant was an eligible institution making principal supplies of education or vocational training and/or whether supplies of hot food and coffee closely related to such principal supplies.

Background

USSU argued that both the supply of hot food and coffee by the USSU shop are exempt via The VAT Act 1994 Schedule 9, group 6, Item 4(a) and note 1(e) as supplies made by an eligible body which makes principal supplies of vocational training, and which are closely related to the (exempt) principal supply of education by the University of Southampton or vocational training by USSU. In the alternative, exemption applies for matters closely related to supplies of education by a third party via a published HMRC concession (and its supplies were within HMRC’s conditions for such a concession).

HMRC disagreed and claimed that these supplies were not closely related to education and that USSU was not an eligible body (no ring fencing of the profits such that they were not necessarily reinvested in its own supplies of education). Therefore, the supplies were properly taxable, and they declined to pay the appellant’s claim of overpaid output tax. The respondent also cited the Loughborough Students’ UnionUpper Tribunal (UT) case.

Decision

The appeal was dismissed for the following reasons:

  • USSU did not satisfy the definition of vocational training
  • the supplies of hot food and coffee were not closely related to a supply of education or vocational training
  • USSU did not satisfy the definition of an “eligible body”

Commentary

Superficially, the claim seemed good. Para 5.5 of PN 709/1 states: “If you’re a student union and you’re supplying catering (including hot takeaway food) to students both on behalf, and with the agreement, of the parent institution, as a concession you can treat your supplies in the same way as the parent institution itself. This means that you can treat your supplies as exempt when made by unions at universities.. This means that most supplies of food and drink made by the union, where the food is sold for consumption in the course of catering will be exempt… For example, food and drink sold from canteens, refectories and other catering outlets (excluding bars), plus food and drink sold from vending machines situated in canteens and similar areas.”

However, the Notice then goes on to add “But it does not cover food and drink sold from campus shops, bars, tuck shops, other similar outlets and certain vending machines…”

This appeal looks a close-run thing, but it demonstrates that small differences in detail can produce different VAT outcomes. We urge all Student Unions and other entities “attached” to education providers to review their position.

VAT: New HMRC guidance on duty deferment and guarantee waivers

By   3 November 2020
0

HMRC has published guidance on a number of issues relating to duty and guarantee waivers:

  • How to apply for duty deferment when importing goods. This will apply to businesses bringing in goods from the EU from 1 January 2021. This means that the duty and customs payments may be delayed

We recommend any business importing goods checks all the requirements and puts plans in place to defer VAT, duties and customs payments wherever possible. Despite political promises, this significant additional red tape as a result of Brexit helps nobody and will be a costly burden.  However, at least the government have put a structure in place which will aid cashflow.

VAT: Post Brexit UK Tariffs

By   15 October 2020
0

Further to my recent article on the Border Operating Model, we now know what Tariffs the UK will apply.

Currently, goods are able to move from country to country inside the EU completely Tariff free. This means that there is no need for import and export formalities which add delays and red tape. Unfortunately, as a result of Brexit, from 1 January 2021, EU/UK trade will be subject to Tariffs as the UK will be a “third country” (third country refers to any country outside the EU, and in this case outside its economic structures – the single market and the customs union).

Commercially, Tariffs add to the cost of importing goods into the UK by UK businesses and increase the price of exports to overseas customers. It is not possible to reclaim the cost of Tariffs (unlike VAT) so these will always represent a real cost to a buyer. The government has now announced what the UK Tariffs will be here.

Overview

The UK has broadly retained the existing Tariff for goods brought into the EU from third countries. However, there are some changes for; important industrial components (nuts, bolts, tubes and screws etc) some consumer products, the removal of Tariffs below 2% and the rounding of Tariffs with a decimal point.

Action

Businesses should review their exposure to these tariffs and what the related customs duty burden will be. They will also need to consider; budgets, pricing and alternative business structures – which may include manufacturing in the EU rather than the UK. We also recommend reviewing Commodity Codes, values for Customs Duties and the origin of the goods. Please also note that the use of incoterms will become increasingly important.

VAT: Domestic Reverse Charge for construction services delayed until 1 March 2021

By   5 June 2020
0

Further to my article on the Domestic Reverse Charge (DRC) for builders being deferred, HMRC has announced a further delay from 1 October 2020 until 1 March 2021 due to the impact of the coronavirus on the construction sector.

Revenue and Customs Brief 7 (2020 sets out the details.

Changes

HMRC announced that there will be an amendment to the original legislation, which was laid in April 2019, to make it a requirement that for businesses to be excluded from the reverse charge because they are end users or intermediary suppliers, they must inform their sub-contractors in writing that they are end users or intermediary suppliers. Details of the DRC here and here.