HMRC have announced via its Policy Paper Customs Brief 13 (2018) that the VAT treatment of forfeit, or “no-show” deposits will change from 1 March 2019.
The changes affect businesses that receive payments for services and part payments for goods and the customer does not:
- use the service
- collect the goods
Typically, this could be a hotel which reserves a room for a deposit which is retained if the customer is a no-show.
Current treatment
Prior to 1 March 2019, charges for unfulfilled supplies and the retention of customer deposits are treated as outside the scope of VAT (and consequently VAT free). This is on the basis that either no supply had been made or, in the alternative, the retention of the deposit represents compensation for a loss, or the costs necessarily incurred.
Practically, this means that output tax is payable on the initial deposit, but this is adjusted if subsequently there is a no-show or goods are not collected.
New treatment
From 1 March 2019, HMRC’s new policy will be that output tax is due on all retained payments for unused services and uncollected goods. Where businesses become aware that a customer has decided not to take up goods or services after paying, the transaction will remain subject to VAT. No adjustments or refunds of VAT will be allowed for those retained payments.
This means that when a non-repayable deposit is taken, VAT will always be due on the payment, regardless of subsequent events. However, if a deposit is returned, there will be no VAT due on it.
The rationale for the new treatment, according to HMRC is that; “because when a customer makes or commits to make a payment, it is for a supply. It cannot be reclassified as a payment to compensate the supplier for a loss once it is known the customer will not use the goods or services”
Who is affected?
Clearly, any business that takes non-refundable deposits will be hit by the new rules. These will be mainly; hotel and accommodation providers, hirers of goods, transport suppliers, the entertainment sector and bespoke goods. (And apparently, in Bulgaria; the production and marketing of bread and pastries according to the Firin OOD case).
Technical
HMRC base their decision on this matter on CJEU decisions in Air France-KLM and Firin OOD) and claim that is treatment is unavoidable.
Please find more details of deposits and advance payments in general here
Please contact me should you have any queries.