In or out?
If a biscuit is covered, even partially, in chocolate the VAT is 20%, but if the chocolate is inside, say a choc chip cookie or a bourbon, it is VAT free.
Tag Archives: penalties
VAT on private school fees – new webinar
HMRC have released a recorded webinar about VAT on private school fees — what you need to do, and when and how to register.
It covers:
- if you should register for VAT as an education provider
- when you should register for VAT
- how to register for VAT
- what you need to charge VAT on
- how and what to reclaim VAT on
VAT: New support for small businesses from HMRC
HMRC has launched new online guidance and interactive tools aimed at helping small business owners and those considering self-employment understand their tax responsibilities. It is aimed at supporting new and existing ‘sole traders’ and helping them to understand their responsibilities. The new interactive tool explains the records they need to keep, taxes that may apply to their business, and includes other useful information.
The resources include a step-by-step guide for registering as a sole trader and a newly developed VAT registration estimator tool to help businesses assess their VAT registration needs based on turnover.
The guidance and interactive tools are free and available directly from GOV.UK. They have been launched for information purposes only, and users will not be registered for any taxes as a result of using them. HMRC will not collect or store any information about the user.
VAT in the Digital Age (ViDA)
EU Member States (MS) recently agreed the much-discussed ViDA package. Since Brexit, this does not directly affect the UK, however, it is an important pointer to the future and where we are all heading, so it will impact the UK in some ways.
The ViDA package (or a version of the finalised package) was first discussed in 2022 and has gone through a tortuous process before all MS agreed it.
What is ViDA?
ViDA aims to tackle what have been identified as three main challenges:
- Real-time digital reporting
The new system introduces real-time digital reporting for cross-border trade, based on e-invoicing. It will give MS the information they need to increase the fight against VAT fraud, especially carousel fraud. The VAT Gap – the difference between expected and actual VAT revenue, has been widening across the EU over a number of years.
It is said that the move to e-invoicing will help reduce VAT fraud by up to €11 billion a year and bring down administrative and compliance costs for EU businesses by over €4.1 billion per year over the next ten years. It should ensure that existing national systems converge across the EU, and this should pave the way for EU countries that wish to introduce national digital reporting systems for domestic trade.
More on e-invoicing here.
- Updated rules for the platform economy
Technological and business developments, especially in e-commerce, mean that VAT rules have struggled to keep pace. Under the new rules, platforms facilitating supplies in the passenger transport and short-term accommodation sectors will become responsible for collecting and remitting VAT to tax authorities when their users do not, for example because they are a small business or individual providers.
This will ensure a uniform approach across all MS and contribute to a level playing field between online and traditional short-term accommodation and transport services. It will also simplify life for SMEs who currently need to understand and comply with the VAT rules, often in different EU countries.
- Single VAT registration
Building on the already existing VAT One Stop Shop (OSS) model for e-commerce, the package allows more businesses selling to consumers in another MSs to fulfil their VAT obligations via an online portal in one EU country. Further measures to improve the collection of VAT include making the Import One Stop Shop (IOSS) mandatory for certain platforms facilitating sales by persons established outside the EU to consumers in the EU.
Commentary
Many countries worldwide already have versions of e-invoicing and real-time reporting or plan to introduce them. Businesses operating in the EU will need to consider how the new rules impact them and what changes are needed for; systems, procedures, tax declarations, along with the commercial implications.
ViDA should result in a more harmonised VAT system and the UK will need to keep in step in order to avoid becoming even more of a commercial outlier.
The UK has also confirmed a consultation on e-invoicing so lessons which can be taken from ViDA will undoubtably inform the UK process.
VAT: Personal Liability Notices
A Personal Liability Notice (PLN) can be issued by HMRC to a company’s director(s) to transfer the liability to pay VAT or a VAT penalty from the company to an individual. A PLN can also be issued to a member of an LLP.
When a PLN is issued
An officer or officers of a company may be personally liable to pay all or part of the company penalty where:
- a company is liable to a penalty for a deliberate wrongdoing and
- the wrongdoing is attributable to the deliberate action of an officer or officers of the company
Additionally, one of the two circumstances below must also apply
- the officer gained or attempted to gain personally from the wrongdoing, or
- the company is insolvent or likely to become insolvent
Any grounds for suspicion that the company may become insolvent should to be supported by evidence, for example, where there are cash flow problems, insufficient assets to cover liabilities, or evidence of phoenixism.
An officer’s liability to pay a penalty also applies to inaccuracy penalties.
Liable persons
The company officers are known in HMRC guidance as “liable officers”. These include:
- elected officers
- managers
- directors
- company secretary
- any other person managing or purporting to manage any of the company’s affairs.
LLP officers are members.
A PLN’s power gives HMRC the right to recover all or part of the penalty from the liable officer rather than the company/LLP itself.
Where there is more than one deliberate wrongdoing, each deliberate wrongdoing must be considered separately for the purpose of establishing whether it should be attributed to an officer or officers.
Wrongdoings
There are four types of wrongdoings:
- the issue of an invoice showing VAT by an unauthorised person
- misuse of a product so that it attracts a higher rate of excise duty
- the handling of goods on which payment of excise duty is outstanding
- knowingly disposing of, or causing or permitting the disposal of, material at an unauthorised waste site
The wrongdoing must arise from the deliberate action of an officer of the company.
Personal gain
Once HMRC has attributed the deliberate wrongdoing to one or more company officers it must consider whether any of the officers, by fact or implication, have gained or attempted to gain personally from the wrongdoing. It is sufficient to show that each officer has gained or attempted to gain. It will not however always be possible to establish the full extent to which each officer has gained or attempted to gain, in which case HMRC would issue the PLN based on best judgment of the amount they attempted to gain personally, eg:
- the officer may accept that there was an actual or attempted personal gain from a deliberate wrongdoing that can be attributed to them, or
- it may be clear from business records or the officer’s lifestyle that they gained or attempted to gain personally from the results of the deliberate wrongdoing
Appeals
A liable officer can appeal against
- a decision to pursue them for all or part of the penalty assessed on the company, as set out in the PLN, including whether the penalty is attributable to them, and
- the amount of the penalty HMRC has allocated to them
- They cannot however appeal against a decision that they have gained or attempted to gain personally from the deliberate wrongdoing, or that the company is likely to go into liquidation
PLNs are subject to the same procedures as company penalties.
Legislation
Finance Act 2008, Schedule 41: Penalties: failure to notify and certain VAT and Excise wrongdoing.
A VAT did you know?
Children’s clothes are zero-rated. These include; hats, caps, braces, belts, garters and scarves, but not earmuffs – which are standard rated even if they are for children.
VAT: New Annual Accounting Scheme guidance published
HMRC have issued new guidance on the Annual Accounting Scheme.
A business can use form VAT600AA if it is already registered for VAT and wants to join the Annual Accounting Scheme.
VAT late payment interest rates reduced
HMRC has announced that late payment interest rates to be reduced after the Bank of England lowered the base rate.
The Bank of England base rate will be reduced to 4.75% from 5.0%.
The changes will come into effect on:
- 18 November 2024 for quarterly instalment payments
- 26 November 2024 for non-quarterly instalments payment
The press release is available here.
VAT: Zero-rated exports. The Procurement International case
Latest from the courts
In the First-Tier Tribunal (FTT) case of Procurement International Ltd (PIL) the issue was whether the movement of goods constituted a zero-rated export.
Background
Both parties essentially agreed the facts: The Appellant’s business is that of a reward recognition programme fulfiller. The Appellant had a catalogue of available products, and it maintained a stock of the most ordered items in its warehouse. PIL supplied these goods to customers who run reward recognition programmes on behalf of their customers who, in turn, want to reward to their customers and/or employees (reward recipients – RR). The reward programme operators (RPOs) provide a platform through which those entitled to receive rewards can such rewards. The RPO will then place orders PIL for the goods.
A shipper collected the goods from PIL in the UK and shipped them directly to the RR (wherever located). The shipper provided the services of delivery including relevant customs clearances etc. on behalf of the Appellant. PIL had zero-rated the supply of goods sent to RRs located overseas. All goods delivered to RRs outside the UK are delivered duty paid (DDP) or delivered at place (DAP). As may be seen by Incoterms the Appellant remained at risk in respect of the goods and liable for all carriage costs and is responsible for performing or contracting for the performance of all customs (export and import) obligations. The Appellant was responsible for all fees, duties, tariffs, and taxes. Accordingly, the Appellant is responsible for, and at risk until, the goods are delivered “by placing them at the disposal of the buyer at the agreed point, if any, or at the named place of destination or by procuring that the goods are so delivered”.
Contentions
HMRC argued that in situations where the RPO was UK VAT registered, the appellant was making a supply of goods to the RPO at a time when the goods were physically located in the UK, and consequently there was a standard-rated supply. It issued an assessment to recover the output tax considered to be underdeclared.
PIL contended that there was a supply of delivered goods which were zero-rated when the goods were removed to a location outside the UK. It was responsible (via contracts which were accepted to reflect the reality of the transactions) for arranging the transport of the goods.
Decision
The FTT held that there was a single composite supplies of delivered goods, and these were a zero-rated supply of exported goods by PIL. The supplies were not made on terms that the RPOs collected or arranged for collection of the goods to remove them from the UK. The Tribunal found that the RPOs took title to the goods at the time they were delivered to the RR, and not before such that it was PIL and not the RPOs who was the exporter. This meant that the RPOs would be regarded as making their supplies outside the UK and would be responsible for overseas VAT as the Place Of Supply (POS) would be in the country in which it took title to the goods (but that was not an issue in this case).
The appeal was allowed, and the assessment was withdrawn.
Legislation
Domestic legislation relevant here is The VAT Act 1994:
- Section 6(2) which fixes the time of supply of goods involving removal as the time they are removed
- Section 7 VATA sets out the basis on which the place of supply is determined. Section 7(2) states that: “if the supply of any goods does not involve their removal from or to the United Kingdom they shall be treated as supplied in the United Kingdom if they are in the United Kingdom and otherwise shall be treated as supplied outside the United Kingdom”.
- Section 30(6) VATA provides that a supply of goods is zero-rated where such supply is made in the UK and HMRC are satisfied that the person supplying the goods has exported them
- For completeness, VAT Regulations 1995, regulation 129 provides the framework for the zero-rating goods removed from the UK by and on behalf of the purchaser of the goods.
Some paragraphs of VAT Notice 703 have the force of law which applies here, namely the sections on:
- direct and indirect exports
- conditions which must be met in full for goods to be zero-rated as exports
- definition of an exporter
- the appointment of a freight forwarder or other party to manage the export transactions and declarations on behalf of the supplier of exporter.
- the conditions and time limits for zero rating
- a situation in which there are multiple transactions leading to one movement of goods
Commentary
The Incoterms set out in the relevant contracts were vital in demonstrating the responsibilities of the parties and consequently, who actually exported the goods. It is crucial when analysing the VAT treatment of transactions to recognise each party’s responsibilities, and importantly, when (and therefore where) the change in possession of the goods takes place.
VAT Schemes Guide – Alternative ways of accounting for tax
It is important to compare the use of each scheme to standard VAT accounting to establish whether a business will benefit. Some schemes are compulsory and there are particular pitfalls for businesses using certain schemes.
I thought that it would be useful to consider the schemes all in one place and look at their features and pros and cons.
These schemes reviewed here are:
- Cash Accounting Scheme
- Annual Accounting Scheme
- Flat Rate Scheme
- Margin schemes for second-hand goods
- Global Accounting
- VAT schemes for retailers
Cash Accounting Scheme
Normally, VAT returns are based on the tax point (usually the VAT invoice date) for sales and purchases. This may mean a business having to pay HMRC the VAT on sales which customers have not yet paid for.
The VAT cash accounting scheme (CAS) instead bases reporting on payment dates, both for purchases and sales. A business will need to ensure its records include payment dates.
A business is only eligible for CAS if its estimated taxable turnover is no more than £1.35m, and can then remain in the scheme as long as it remains below £1.6m.
Advantages
- usually beneficial for cash flow especially if its customers are slow to pay
- output tax is not payable at all if a business has a bad debt (other bad debt relief here)
Disadvantages
- it is generally not beneficial for a repayment business (one which reclaims more VAT than it pays, eg; an exporter or supplier of zero rated goods or services)
- it is not usually beneficial if a business purchases significant amounts of goods or services on credit
Annual Accounting Scheme
The Annual Accounting Scheme allows a business to pay VAT on account, in either nine monthly or three quarterly payments. These instalments are based on VAT paid in the previous year. It is then required to complete a single, annual VAT return which is used to calculate any balance owed by the business or due from HMRC.
A business is eligible for the scheme if its estimated taxable turnover is no more than £1.35m and is permitted to remain in the scheme as long as it remains below £1.6m.
Advantages
- reduces paperwork as only the need to complete one return instead of four (although it does not remove the requirement to keep all the normal VAT records and accounts)
- improves management of cash flow
Disadvantages
- not suitable for repayment businesses as they would only receive one repayment at the end of the year
- if turnover decreases, the interim payments may be higher than under standard accounting
Flat Rate Scheme
The Flat Rate Scheme (FRS) is designed to assist smaller businesses reduce the amount of time and complexity required for VAT accounting. The FRS removes the need to calculate the VAT on every transaction. Instead, a business pays a flat rate percentage of its VAT inclusive turnover. The percentage paid is less than the standard VAT rate because it recognises the fact that no input tax can be claimed on purchases. The flat rate percentage used is dependent on a business’ trade sector.
A business is eligible for this scheme if its estimated taxable turnover in the next year will not exceed £150,000. Once using the scheme, a business is permitted to continue using it until its income exceeds £230,000.
If eligible, a business may combine the FRS with the Annual Accounting Scheme, additionally, there is an option to effectively use a cash basis so there is no need to use CAS. Unfortunately, changes to the scheme rules regarding ” limited cost traders” mean that the scheme has become less attractive.
Advantages
- depending on trade sector and circumstances, may result in a real VAT saving
- simplified record keeping; no requirement to separate gross, VAT and net in accounts
- fewer rules; no issues with input tax a business can and cannot recover on purchases
- certainty of knowing how much of income is payable to HMRC
Disadvantages
- no reclaim of input tax incurred on purchases
- limited cost traders impact
- if a business buys a significant amount from VAT registered businesses, it is likely to result in more VAT due
- likely to be unattractive for businesses making zero-rated or exempt sales because output tax would also apply to this hitherto VAT free income
- low turnover limit
Margin Scheme for Second Hand Goods
A business normally accounts for output tax on the full value of its taxable supplies and reclaims input tax on its purchases. However, if a business deals in second-hand goods, works of art, antiques or collectibles it may use a Margin Scheme. This scheme enables a business to account for VAT only on the difference between the purchase and selling price of an item; the margin. It is not possible to reclaim input tax on the purchase of an item and there will be no output tax if no profit is achieved (however, if an item is sold for less than the purchase price, a business cannot offset losses against the profits of other items to reduce the overall VAT liability).
There is a special margin schemes for auctioneers and a variation of the Margin Scheme (Global Accounting) is considered below.
Advantages
- usually beneficial if buying from (non-VAT registered) members of the public
- purchaser will not see a VAT charge
- although no input tax claimable on purchases of scheme items, VAT may be claimed in the usual way on overheads and other fees etc
Disadvantages
- record keeping requirements are demanding and closely checked, eg; stock records and invoices which are required for both purchases and sales
- cannot be used for items purchased on a VAT invoice
- can be complex and create a cost if goods exported
- although no VAT due on sales if a loss is made, there is no set-off of the loss
Global Accounting
The problem with the Second Hand Goods Scheme is that full details of each individual item purchased and sold has to be recorded. Global Accounting is an optional, simplified variation of the Second Hand Margin Scheme. It differs from the standard Margin Scheme in that rather than accounting for the margin achieved on the sale of each individual item, output tax is calculated on the margin achieved between the total purchases and total sales in a particular accounting period.
Advantages
- simplified version of the Margin Scheme
- record keeping requirements reduced
- losses made on sales reduce VAT payable
- beneficial for businesses which buy and sell bulk volume, low value eligible goods
Disadvantages
- cannot be used for; aircraft, boats, caravans, horses or motor vehicles
- similar to Margin Scheme disadvantages apart from loss set off
VAT Schemes for Retailers
It is usually difficult for retailers to issue an invoice for each sale made, so various retail schemes have been designed to simplify VAT. The appropriate scheme for a business depends on whether its retail turnover (excluding VAT) is; below £1m, between £1m and £130m and higher.
Smaller businesses may be able to use a retail scheme with CAS and Annual Accounting but it cannot combine a Retail Scheme with the FRS. However, retailers may choose to use the FRS instead of a Retail Scheme.
Using standard VAT accounting, a VAT registered business must record the VAT on each sale. However, via a Retail Scheme, it calculates the value of its total VAT taxable sales for a period, eg; a day, and the proportions of that total that are taxable at different rates of VAT; standard, reduced and zero.
According to the scheme a business uses it then applies the appropriate VAT fraction to that sales figure to calculate the output tax due. A business may only use the Retail Scheme for retail sales and must use the standard accounting procedures for other supplies. A business must still issue a VAT invoice to any customer who requests one. It is a requirement of any scheme choice that HMRC must consider it fair and reasonable.
A business can join a retail scheme at the beginning of any VAT period and HMRC does not need to be notified.
Examples of Retail Schemes
- Apportionment
- Direct calculation
- The point of sale scheme
The required calculations vary for each scheme.
NB: There are special arrangements for caterers, retail pharmacists and florists.
Advantages
- no requirement to issue an invoice for each sale
- most schemes are relatively simple to administer once set up. Technology assists in a helpful way with EPOS systems
- simplifies record keeping
Disadvantages
- it is usual for each line sold to need to be coded correctly for VAT liability
- smaller businesses without state of the art technology may be at a disadvantage
- time and resources required to set up and maintain systems
- in some cases the calculation depends on staff “pressing the right button”
- often complex calculations and record keeping
- very precise and complicated rules
- lack of understanding by a number of inspectors
- complexity increases the risk of misdeclaration
Overall
As may be seen, there are a lot of choices for a business to consider, especially a start-up. Choosing a scheme which is inappropriate may result in VAT overpayment and a lot of unneeded record keeping and administration. There are real savings to be made by using a beneficial scheme, both in terms of VAT payable and staff time. There are also some schemes which are compulsory, like the Tour Operators’ Margin Scheme (TOMS).
We are happy to review a business’ circumstances and calculate what schemes would produce the best outcome.
Please contact us if you require further information.