Tag Archives: VAT-grants

What is outside the scope of VAT, and what does it mean?

By   10 January 2025

Put simply, income which is outside the scope (OSC) of VAT is UK VAT free. It means that either there has been no supply in respect of that income (non-business, or ‘NB’), or if there is, it has a place of supply (POS) which is outside the UK. Although VAT free, OSC is distinct from exempt or zero-rated supplies and has a different impact for the entity involved in NB activities.

So, here I consider the different types of OSC income and how it affects the VAT position of the recipient of such a payment.

Charity

Charities and NFP organisations often receive income from various sources and often receive NB income which is OSC. This income is often donations for which the donor does not receive anything (there is no consideration provided by the charity). An organisation such as a charity that is run on a non-profit-making basis may still be regarded as carrying on a business activity for VAT purposes. This is unaffected by the fact that the activity is performed for the benefit of the community. It is therefore important for a charity to determine whether particular transactions are business or NB activities. This applies both when considering registration (if there is only NB activity a charity cannot be registered and therefore cannot recover any input tax) and after registration. ‘Business’ has a wide meaning for VAT purposes – an activity may still be business if the amount charged does no more than cover the cost to the charity of making the supply or where the charge made is less than cost. If the charity makes no charge at all the activity is unlikely to be considered business. A common area of complexity for charities when considering whether their activities are in the course of business is receipt of grant funding (please see below).

Grants 

There is no ‘standard’ VAT treatment of grants. The VAT outcome depends on the precise facts of each specific agreement. The most important test is whether the grantor receives any consideration in return for the payment. It may be that the donor recognises the good work a body does and wishes to contribute (akin to a donation) which is OSC. Alternatively, the recipient of the grant may be obliged to provide something in return (a supply which is not OSC). A helpful way of looking at this is to consider, not what the recipient does with grant money, but what it does for it.

Inter-company charges

Charges between VAT group members are OSC. Moreover, charges between non-VAT-grouped companies may also be OSC. These are commonly called ‘management charges’ and the VAT treatment depends on a number of facts. It is often the case that a management charge is used as a mechanism for transferring “value” from one company to another. If it is done in an arbitrary manner with no written agreement in place, and nothing identifiable is provided the income is likely to be OSC. Otherwise, it is likely to be a taxable supply. What is important is not how a management charge is calculated, but what the supply actually is (if it is one). The calculation, whether based on a simple pro-rata amount between separate subsidiaries, or via a complex mechanism set out in a written agreement has no impact on the VAT treatment. As always in VAT, the basic question is: what is actually provided? 

Place of supply not the UK

If the POS is outside the UK, then the resulting payment for that supply is OSC. The POS rules can be complex and care must be taken in identifying the correct country to declare output tax (this may include the use of the OSS). In some instances, the Reverse Charge is applied. Input tax incurred in relation these supplies is recoverable, subject to the normal rules, and this distinguishes this type of supply from some of the others discussed here.

Transfer Of a Going Concern (TOGC) 

A TOGC is deemed to be neither a supply of goods nor services, so consequently, it is OSC. Input tax incurred in respect of the costs of making a TOGC are considered an overhead of the business for partial exemption purposes, so it is not automatically disallowed because it relates to a ‘non-supply’.

Supplies by a non-taxable person

Sales by a business person who is not liable to be VAT registered.

Insurance etc

A payment between persons, which is paid under a contract of indemnity, is OSC, because it does not represent consideration for a supply, eg; sums paid under an insurance policy.

Private transactions

These transactions between individuals or gifts received are OSC.

Statutory fees

These are OSC, an example of such fees are: the London congestion charge, MOT testing, some road tolls, and parking fines.

Input tax recovery 

VAT incurred on costs directly relating to OSC activities is not input tax and cannot be recovered (there are no de minimis limits). This is separate to partial exemption and a business/NB calculation is required before a partial exemption calculation is carried out, so it is a two-tier exercise. It may be possible to combine these two calculations, but that is an article for another day.

HMRC has issued new guidance on the amount of input tax claimable when an element is attributable to NB activities. If an entity is involved in both business and NB activities, eg; a charity which provides free advice and also has a shop which sells donated goods, it is unable to recover all of the VAT it incurs.  VAT attributable to NB activities is not input tax and cannot be reclaimed.  Therefore, it is necessary to calculate the quantum of VAT attributable to business and NB activities. That VAT which cannot be directly attributed is called overhead VAT and must be apportioned between business and NB activities.  There are many varied ways of doing this as the VAT legislation does not specify any particular method.  It is important to consider all of the available alternatives. Examples of these are; income, expenditure, time, floorspace, transaction count etc (similar to those methods available for partial exemption calculations). Any calculation must be fair and reasonable.

Overall

OSC income should not be recognised in the value box of VAT returns and it does not count towards the VAT registration limit. It is likely to negatively affect the recipient’s input tax recovery position. The distinction between business and non-business is crucial and will significantly impact on an entity’s overall VAT position.

Further reading

The following articles consider case law and other relevant business/NB issues:

Wakefield College

Longbridge

Babylon Farm

A Shoot

Y4 Express

Lajvér Meliorációs Nonprofit Kft. and Lajvér Csapadékvízrendezési Nonprofit Kft

Healthwatch Hampshire CIC 

Pertempts Limited

Northumbria Healthcare

VAT: The meaning of “business” and “non-business”- New guidance

By   15 June 2022

HMRC has issued new guidance: Revenue and Customs Brief 10(2022) on how to determine if an entity carries out business or non-business (NB) activities. This goes to the core of the tax and establishes whether a person:

  • is registerable for VAT
  • charges output tax
  • can recover input tax

It mainly affects charities, NFP, an organisation which receives grants or subsidies and entities which are carrying out NB activities.

Previous tests

Since 1981 previous cases (mainly Lord Fisher and Morrison’s Academy) have set out the following business tests:

  1. Is the activity a serious undertaking earnestly pursued?
  2. Is the activity an occupation or function, which is actively pursued with reasonable or recognisable continuity?
  3. Does the activity have a certain measure of substance in terms of the quarterly or annual value of taxable supplies made?
  4. Is the activity conducted in a regular manner and on sound and recognised business principles?
  5. Is the activity predominantly concerned with the making of taxable supplies for a consideration?
  6. Are the taxable supplies that are being made of a kind which, subject to differences of detail, are commonly made by those who seek to profit from them?

Changes

The guidance states that the ‘predominant concern’ is now irrelevant. The focus is on whether there is a direct link between the services the recipient receives, and the payment made rather than on the wider context of the organisation’s charitable objectives or motive. This is as a result of the Longbridge case.

I often think it helps if a person bears in mind here the comment in the EC case of Tolsma translated as: “…the question is whether services carried on by [a person] were carried on for the payment or simply with the payment”.

There is now a two-part test derived from the Wakefield College Court of Appeal case.

Test One:

The activity results in a supply of goods or services for consideration. This requires a legal relationship between the supplier and the recipient. The initial question is whether the supply is made for a consideration. An activity that does not involve the making of supplies for consideration is not a business activity.

Test Two:

The supply is made for the purpose of obtaining income therefrom (remuneration)

More on the definition of taxable supply here.

Where there is a direct or sufficient nexus between the supplies provided and the payments made, the activity is regarded as business (a taxable supply). The Wakefield case made a distinction between consideration and remuneration. Simply because a payment is received for a service provided does not itself mean that the activity is business. For an activity to be regarded as economic it must be carried out for the purpose of obtaining income (remuneration) even if the charge is below cost.

HMRC states that although it will no longer apply the above Lord Fisher tests, it accepts that they “can be used as a set of tools designed to help identify those factors which should be considered.”  So Lord Fisher lives on in some form.

Further information

More detail is provided by HMRC in the updated Internal Guidance VBNB10000

Further reading

The following articles consider case law and other relevant business/NB issues:

Wakefield College

Longbridge

Babylon Farm

A Shoot

Y4 Express

Lajvér Meliorációs Nonprofit Kft. and Lajvér Csapadékvízrendezési Nonprofit Kft

Healthwatch Hampshire CIC 

Pertempts Limited