Tag Archives: VAT-MTD

HMRC internal manual: VAT Assessments and Error Correction update

By Marcus Ward 21 October 2024

HMRC’s manual VAT Assessments and Error Correction was updated on 15 October 2024.

This internal guidance is for HMRC inspectors (but is equally useful for advisers) covers assessments and error correction. The amendments apply mainly to General assessment procedures: Importance of avoiding delay.

The manual covers:

It also refers to for the most up-to-date guidance on reasonable excuse CH160000.as a defence against penalties and interest.

VAT: Split payments and e-invoicing

By Marcus Ward 15 October 2024

The recent announcement of an e-invoicing consultation means that businesses should consider the impacts of the intended introduction now.

When this is published (potentially in the Budget on 30 October) it is be anticipated it will cover the intended effective date, how it will affect types of taxpayer, eg; B2B and B2C, how it will be implemented, and its range.

This raises further questions “down the line”, so here we look a step further and consider “split payments” as there has been a lot of conversation and media coverage on this subject.

What are split payments (sometimes known as “real-time extraction”)?

Split payments use card payment technology to collect VAT on online sales and transfer it directly to HMRC rather than the seller collecting it from the buyer along with the payment for the supply, and then declaring it to HMRC on a return in the usual way.

Clearly, HMRC is very keen to introduce such a system, but there are significant hurdles, the biggest being the complexity for online sellers, payment processors, input tax systems, agents, advisers and HMRC itself.

Where are we on split payments?

HMRC has previously published a Prior Information Notice (PIN) and associated Request for Information (RFI), seeking views on the outline requirements and proposed procurement process split payments. This should, inter alia, assist HMRC in:

identifying where it is intended that the purchased goods or services are to be delivered and/or consumed
the possibility to apply a split only above or below a certain value threshold
the feasibility for the splitting mechanism to calculate a composite VAT total across a mixed basket of goods and/ or services, each potentially with a different rate of VAT.

This builds on previous information gathering/consultations/discussions carried out some years ago.

Background

The expansion of the online shopping market has brought unprecedented levels of transactions. The results of digitalisation have also brought challenges for tax systems. Jurisdictions all over the world are currently grappling with the question of how to prevent large VAT losses, which can arise from cross-border online sales. This happens when consumers buy goods from outside their jurisdiction from sellers who, through fraud or ignorance, do not comply with their tax obligations. It is costing the UK tax authorities an estimated £1 billion to £1.5 billion (figures for 2015-16) a year. The UK government believes that intercepting VAT through intermediaries in the payment cycle, split payment potentially offers a powerful means of enforcing VAT compliance on sellers who are outside the UK’s jurisdiction.

Fraud

The fraud carried out by online sellers is not particularly sophisticated but is difficult to combat. Simply, sellers either use a fake VAT number to collect VAT without declaring it, or even more basically, collect the VAT and disappear.

Proposed spilt payment methods

The way in which payments are split represent difficult technical VAT issues, particularly when sales are at different VAT rates. The three proposals are:

Standard rate split. This assumes that all sales are liable to the standard rate VAT and does not recognise any input tax deduction. Extraction of 20% of tax, regardless of the actual liability (potentially, 5%, or zero) appears unfair and would be very difficult to impose. Cashflow would be negatively affected too.
Flat Rate Scheme (FRS). This is a proposal by HMRC to insist that online sellers overseas to use the FRS using a specific new rate for this purpose. The FRS threshold of £150,000 pa could be increased for overseas businesses, but this would potentially give overseas sellers an advantage over UK businesses, so politically, if nothing else, would prove to be a hard sell.
Net effective rate. This would mean an overseas business calculating its own exact net effective rate, based on its outputs and inputs from the previous year’s transactions (similar to TOMS).
Composite rate. A composite VAT total across a mixed range of goods or services, each potentially with a different rate of VAT. The mechanism for carrying this calculation out is unclear.

There may be more proposals forthcoming, but none of the above proposals appear reasonable and the complexity they would bring would seem to rule them out as matters stand – although this has not previously stopped HMRC introducing certain measures and the obvious benefits to the authorities cannot be ignored.

Overall

The technology for split payments currently exists and is being used in some Latin American countries (and Poland). The concept is part of a larger movement towards real-time taxation and MTD. Our view is that split payments are coming, but we do not know in which form or when.

This article is based on one first published by MWCL on 9 January 2023.

VAT: Carousel fraud – How to recognise it and how to avoid been caught in it

By Marcus Ward 8 August 2024

VAT carousel fraud, also known as missing trader fraud or missing trader intra-community (MTIC) fraud, is a complex and highly sophisticated process used by organised criminals which involves defrauding governments of money that should be paid in VAT. It involves a series of transactions where goods are repeatedly bought and sold across borders, with the criminal acquiring goods free of VAT (exports of goods are tax free) and then reselling them with VAT added. The fraudster then does not pay output tax to the relevant authority, usually disappearing or closing the business without doing so. It mainly takes place in Europe, but also increasingly in South East Asia.

Round and round

If the goods are not sold to consumers (B2C) but rather, the transactions pass through a series of businesses. To perpetuate a carousel fraud, companies often create a number of sham shell companies to conceal the nature of the transactions in a complex web. The shell companies continue to trade with each other, and the transactions go round and round like a carousel. This can be almost endless. It is possible for the same goods to be traded many times between companies within the carousel fraud scheme network. Often, these transactions do not actually occur – the goods do not actually move from one party to another, but false invoices are issued.

It is common for these criminals to use the fraudulent money they have illegitimately obtained from other large scale illegal activities.

Innocent participants

Unfortunately, carousel fraud can involve innocent businesses. This often mean that these businesses suffer a VAT cost because HMRC will refuse to repay an input tax claim as the matching output tax was not paid by the missing trader. HMRC do this on the basis that the claimant knew, or should have known, that (s)he was involved in a VAT fraud (so perhaps not always so innocent).

Refusal to repay an input tax claim

This option is available to governments using the “Kittel” principle. This refers to a Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) case – Axel Kittel & Recolta Recycling SPRL (C-439/04 and C-440/04) where it was held a taxable person must forego his right to reclaim input tax where “it is ascertained, having regard to objective factors, that the taxable person knew or should have known that, by his purchase, he was participating in a transaction connected with fraudulent evasion of VAT”.

The right of input tax deduction may also be denied where the taxpayer could/should have guessed that their transactions involved VAT fraud.

Due diligence

It is crucial that businesses carry out comprehensive due diligence/risk assessment to avoid buying goods that have been subject to carousel fraud anywhere along the supply chain. It is not enough to avoid a refusal to repay input tax to say to HMRC that a business just “didn’t know” about a previous fraud. The scope of verification of a transaction will depend on its size, value, and the type of business, eg; whether it is a new or existing business partner. Transactions with regular suppliers should also be verified, although there should be be a lower risk of VAT fraud.

HMRC sets out in its internal manuals guidance on due diligence and risk assessment which is helpful. The following quote sets out the authorities’ overview:

“The important thing to remember is that merely making enquiries is not enough. The taxable person must take appropriate action based on the results of those enquiries. Therefore, for example, if the taxable person has undertaken effective due diligence/risk assessment on its supplier and that due diligence/risk assessment shows one or more of the following results in relation to the supplier:

only been trading for a very short period of time,
managed to achieve a large income in that short period of time,
a poor credit rating,
returned only partly completed application or trading forms,
contacted the taxable person out-of-the-blue etc,

and yet the taxable person still goes ahead and trades without making any further enquiries, this could lead to the conclusion that the due diligence/risk assessment was casually undertaken and of no value”.

Carousel VAT fraud investigations

HMRC carries out serious VAT investigations via the procedures set out in Public Notice 160 in cases where they have reason to believe dishonest conduct has taken place. These are often cases where larger amounts of VAT are involved and/or where HMRC suspect fraudulent behaviour. If a business is under investigation for carousel VAT fraud it will receive a letter from HMRC. The consequences of a carousel VAT fraud conviction are serious, and a recipient of such a letter is strongly advised to contact a specialist carousel fraud barrister immediately to provide expert legal guidance.

The Reverse charge (RC) mechanism

Governments take the threat of carousel VAT fraud very seriously and are continually implementing new measures to deter the schemes. The UK has introduced changes to the way that VAT is charged on mobile telephones, computer chips and emissions allowances to help prevent crime (it was common to use these goods and services in carousel fraud).

The RC mechanism requires the purchaser, rather than the supplier, to account for VAT on the supply via a self-supply. Therefore, the supplier does not collect VAT, so it cannot defraud the government.

The future

VAT policy is consistently updated, so businesses must be aware of these changes to ensure compliance. Technology is being progressively used to fight fraud, and again, businesses need to be aware of this and the obligation to upgrade their own technology to comply with, say; real time reporting, eInvoicing, and other innovations. Compliance technology is increasingly employed to detect inconsistent transactions which means that a business must be compliant, because if it isn’t it will be easier for the tax authorities to detect. Even if non-compliance is unintentional the exposure to penalties and interest is increased.

VAT: Changes to agent authorisation

By Marcus Ward 13 September 2023

Making Tax Digital (MTD)

HMRC has stated that from October this year it is removing the functionality to copy across existing VAT clients to agent services account (ASA).

When using ASA, agents can copy over existing client relationships for VAT and Income Tax Self Assessment (ITSA) customers from their old Government Gateway ID. HMRC will be removing this functionality to copy across existing VAT clients to ASA . It is important to ensure that existing VAT clients are copied across to ASA before this date.

Once this functionality is removed VAT clients can be authorised using the digital handshake authorisation route available in your ASA.

The copy functionality will remain for ITSA customers.

VAT: What are split payments?

By Marcus Ward 9 January 2023

The term “split payment” is increasingly cropping up in conversations and in the media, so I thought it would be a good time to look at the concept.

Split payments, sometimes called real-time extraction, uses card payment technology to collect VAT on online sales and transfer it directly to HMRC rather than the seller collecting it from the buyer along with the payment for the supply, and then declaring it to HMRC on a return in the usual way.

Where are we on split payments?

At the end of the year HMRC published a Prior Information Notice (PIN) and associated Request for Information (RFI), seeking views on the outline requirements and proposed procurement process split payments. This should, inter alia, assist HMRC in:

identifying where it is intended that the purchased goods or services are to be delivered and/or consumed
the possibility to apply a split only above or below a certain value threshold
the feasibility for the splitting mechanism to calculate a composite VAT total across a mixed basket of goods and/ or services, each potentially with a different rate of VAT.

This builds on previous information gathering/consultations/discussions carried out a number of years ago.

Background

Fraud

Proposed spilt payment methods

The way in which payments are split represent difficult technical VAT issues, particularly when sales are at different VAT rates. The three proposals are:

Standard rate split. This assumes that all sales are liable to the standard rate VAT and does not recognise any input tax deduction. Extraction of 20% of tax, regardless of the actual liability (potentially, 5%, or zero) appears unfair and would be very difficult to impose. Cashflow would be negatively affected too.
Flat Rate Scheme (FRS). This is a proposal by HMRC to insist that online sellers overseas to use the FRS using a specific new rate for this purpose. The FRS threshold of £150,000 pa could be increased for overseas businesses, but this would potentially give overseas sellers an advantage over UK businesses, so politically, if nothing else, would prove to be a hard sell.
Net effective rate. This would mean an overseas business calculating its own exact net effective rate, based on its outputs and inputs from the previous year’s transactions (similar to TOMS).
Composite rate. A composite VAT total across a mixed range of goods or services, each potentially with a different rate of VAT. The mechanism for carrying this calculation out is unclear.

Overall

VAT: MTD reminder

By Marcus Ward 4 October 2022

HMRC have announced that the existing Making Tax Digital (MTD) online portal closes on 31 October 2022.

What businesses need to do now (or they could face a penalty)

If businesses haven not signed up to MTD and started using compatible software already, they must follow these steps now:

Step 1

Choose suitable MTD-compatible software they can find a list of software on GOV.‌‌‌UK.

Step 2

Check the permissions in their software – once they have allowed it to work with MTD, they can file their VAT returns easily. Go to GOV.‌‌‌UK and search ‘manage permissions for tax software’ for information on how businesses should do this.

Step 3

Keep digital records for their current and future VAT returns – a business can find out what records they need to keep on GOV.‌‌‌UK.

Step 4

Sign up for MTD and file their future VAT returns using MTD-compatible software – to find out how to do this, go to GOV.‌‌‌UK and search ‘record VAT’.

Businesses who file quarterly or monthly VAT returns must complete these steps in order to file their returns due after 1‌‌‌ ‌‌November.

Exemption from MTD for VAT

There are exemptions from MTD and they my be applied for here.

VAT: Making Tax Digital (MTD) Reminder

By Marcus Ward 23 August 2022

HMRC has issued a reminder that:

from 1 November 2022, taxpayers will no longer be able to use their existing VAT online account to file their monthly or quarterly VAT returns

taxpayers that file annual VAT returns will still be able to use their VAT online account until 15 May 2023

by law, VAT-registered businesses must now sign up to MTD and use MTD-compatible software to keep their VAT records and file their VAT returns

there are penalties for businesses that do not sign up for MTD and file their VAT returns through MTD-compatible software,

even if taxpayers already use MTD-compatible software to keep records and file their VAT returns online, they must sign up to MTD before they file their next return

businesses may be able to get a discount on software through the UK Government’s Help to Grow: Digital scheme, which offers 50% off compatible digital accounting software

VAT: How to avoid MTD penalties

By Marcus Ward 15 June 2022

HMRC has published a new Factsheet CC/FS69 which sets out compliance checks to be made to avoid penalties for Making Tax Digital (MTD).

Under MTD, VAT-registered businesses must keep certain records digitally and file their VAT returns using compatible software.

The Factsheet covers:

signing up to MTD – go to www.gov.uk and search for ‘VAT record keeping’. A business must have functional compatible software in place before you signing up

filing VAT return using functional compatible software. This needs to be able to record and store digital records, provide HMRC with information and VAT returns from the data held in those digital records, and receive information from HMRC

keep records digitally in an “electronic account” (all transactions must be contained in an electronic account but there is no need to scan paper records like invoices and receipts)

use digital links to transfer or exchange data

use the checking functions within the software (to ensure returns are correct before being filed)

Penalties

HMRC levy penalties for MTD for the following actions:

filing returns not using use functional compatible software. A penalty applies for every return filed in error

not keeping records digitally, a penalty applies for every day on which a business does not meet this requirement

not using digital links to transfer data between pieces of software, a penalty applies for every day on which a business does not meet this requirement

not signing up to MTD

These penalties apply in addition to existing penalties and interest charged for a range of misdemeanours from late returns to deliberate underdeclarations.

Making Tax Digital for VAT – extra revenue calculated

By Marcus Ward 21 March 2022

HMRC has published research which evaluates the impact of the introduction of Making Tax Digital (MTD) for VAT.

The report sets out that an additional circa £185 million of tax has been collected, according to its data. This is compared to the original estimate which was that an additional amount of £115 million of VAT would be received by the department.

For businesses above the registration threshold, the estimated additional tax revenue due to MTD is an average of £57 per business. This represents a 0.9% increase from the average amount estimated had the businesses not used MTD. HMRC says that this research provides “strong evidence that Making Tax Digital is achieving its objective of reducing the tax gap by reducing the amount of errors made when filing tax returns”.

MTD background

MTD aims to reduce the tax gap by helping businesses pay the right amount of tax. The tax gap is the difference between the theoretical amount of tax that should be paid and the actual tax receipts. The difference is caused by several reasons including avoidance, evasion, and calculation errors or failure to take reasonable care when filing returns.

MTD is intended to tackle the part of the tax gap which is caused by error and failure to take reasonable care. Businesses are required to keep records in digital form and file their VAT returns using software that directly extracts information from these digital records. This should improve accuracy and remove opportunities to make certain types of mistakes in preparing and submitting tax returns, particularly arithmetical and transposition errors.

Downside

All is not sweetness and light though. HMRC has been slammed by The House of Lords Economic Affairs Committee which published a report that said that MTD for VAT cost far more than was predicted in HMRC’s impact assessments. The Committee also criticised HMRC, saying it “inadequately considered the needs and concerns of smaller businesses” and that HMRC has neglected its duty to support small businesses through the implementation of the controversial measures, suggesting it “will make life even more difficult” for them. In addition, the Committee said it “remained unconvinced” of the government’s logic used to justify the speed and rigidity with which the programme was being introduced.

A VAT did you know?

By Marcus Ward 27 November 2020

Bye bye old VAT returns.

HMRC has revealed that it will retire the existing VAT online filing system for VAT 100 forms from April 2021.

From that date, only the MTD method is possible and the original (the XML submission where a business logs into the HMRC portal) will be discontinued.