Tag Archives: VAT-prompt-payment

VAT: Discounts – value of supply. The TalkTalk case

By   11 January 2023
0

In the First Tier tribunal (FTT) case of TalkTalk Telecom Limited the issue was the amount of consideration received on which output tax was due. Specifically, whether “prompt payment discounts” which were offered, but not taken up by customers, reduced the value of a supply.

Background

TalkTalk offered most of its retail customers the option of receiving a 15% discount on its services if their monthly bills were paid within 24 hours.

TalkTalk accounted for output tax on the basis that the consideration received was reduced by the discount, whether or not customers had in fact paid within the 24 hours. In other words; whether or not the discount had actually been applied so that customers paid less.

The appellant considered that this approach was consistent with Value Added Tax Act 1994, Schedule 6 Para 4(1), which provides:

“Where goods or services are supplied for a consideration in money and on terms allowing a discount for prompt payment, the consideration shall be taken for the purposes of section 19 as reduced by the discount, whether or not payment is made in accordance with those terms.”

HMRC’s contention was that the offer only reduced the consideration for VAT purposes where customers had actually paid the reduced amount, and that there was no reduction when the discount was not taken up.

Decision

The above legislation only applies to services supplied “on terms allowing a discount for prompt payment”. In deciding whether this was the case in this appeal the FTT analysed the contractual position.

The contracts were governed by terms and conditions (T&Cs) published on TTL’s website. This discount was not referred to in the T&Cs, but on a separate dedicated page within the same website.

The judge decided that the discount contractual term comes into existence at exactly the same moment as the payment and the supply. There was not a contractual term under the T&C’s under which a lower amount was payable if payments were made earlier. On this point, TalkTalk contended that the T&Cs were varied by the subsequent discount option, and, as a result, the services had been “supplied…on terms allowing a discount for prompt payment” as required by Para 4(1), but this argument was rejected.

As per the Virgin Media Upper Tribunal case the Tribunal considered that the position was different between services billed in advance, and services billed in arrears.

Advance payments

The contractual variation did not include an offer for the customer to pay a discounted amount at some point in the future, so Para 4(1) did not apply to services billed in advance.

Payment in arrears

The FTT ruled that customers accepted the discount offer after delivery of the services. The supply had therefore been made on the terms set out in the T&Cs, and the customer was therefore contractually required to pay the full amount. The discount option was an offer by the appellant to accept a lower sum with an earlier payment date to discharge that pre-existing contractual obligation. As a matter of law, this was an offer to accept a post-supply rebate of consideration already due and therefore it could not be a discount.

The appeal was dismissed.

Commentary

Another case which highlights both the complexity of the rules on consideration and the importance of contracts. At stake here was VAT of £10,606,226.00 which was deemed to be underpaid during a four-month period only. If in doubt – take advice!

VAT – Prompt Payment Discounts (PPD) changes to valuation from 1 April 2015

By   19 February 2015
1

VAT – Prompt Payment Discount Changes

Businesses don’t have much time to change their accounting procedures and systems to deal with the new PPD rules.  A recent survey has shown that over 13% of business will be affected by the changes which do not appear to have been given much publicity. These changes are necessary to align UK legislation with the EC Principal VAT Directive.  It is crucial that advisers and businesses are not caught out by the change in valuation of supplies offered at a discount.

The changes – summary

Old Rules

Under the previous rules output tax was due on the discounted price offered for prompt payment – regardless of whether the customer takes up the discount.

New Rules

From 1 April 2015 output tax is due on the full consideration actually paid by the customer when PPD is offered.

The new rules are required because HMRC is concerned that there was a difference between output tax paid on the discounted price, and the (higher) amount received if a PPD is not taken.  Historically, this was not so much of an issue because most PPD was offered B2B and the VAT was generally recoverable by the recipient of the supply.  However, increasingly, PPD is now offered B2C and therefore reduces “sticking tax” and the consequential VAT loss for HMRC.

A simple example

Old Rules

B2B PPD of 10% if invoice paid within 21 days.

Goods                                          £10,000

VAT 20% on £9,000                     £1,800

Invoice Total                               £11,800

Both parties post £1,800 to VAT account and there is no adjustment if discount not taken.

New Rules

Using the above figures:

Must assume discount is not taken so invoice total = £12,000

If customer actually takes up PPD a credit note is issued for both elements of the supply – £200 credit for the VAT.

Both parties process the new documentation to adjust the original invoice – VAT is neutral.

This increases a business’ administrative burden and also creates a significant additional risk of penalties and interest if businesses are ignorant of the change, or implement the changes incorrectly.