Tag Archives: vat-registration

VAT: New registration checking service

By   11 December 2020
0

The Government has launched a website for checking UK VAT numbers as EU VIES will no longer be available post Brexit.

This service can be used to check:

  • if a UK VAT registration number is valid
  • the name and address of the business the number is registered to

If you are a UK VAT-registered business, you can also use this service to prove when you have checked the validity of a UK VAT number.

VAT: Changes to services post Brexit

By   18 November 2020
0

As we know, the UK will leave the EU on 1 January 2021. A lot of articles have, understandably, focussed on the movement of goods between the UK and the EU, however, there will be significant changes for suppliers and consumers of services. Some of these will be beneficial, and some, charitably, will be a royal pain.

In this article I have tried to summarise the most important changes. Compared to supplies of goods, the changes to services are more certain, so businesses can make preparations with more confidence.

The changes to services

  • Currently, B2B supplies of services to EU recipients are generally UK VAT free (the customer accounts for VAT via a reverse charge). However, currently, for most B2C supplies UK VAT is chargeable. From next year, there is no need to distinguish between B2B and B2C supplies of services to EU recipients – all will be UK VAT free.  Also, there will no longer be the need to differentiate EU and outside the EU customers. A UK business making such supplies will no longer be required to obtain its customer’s VAT number and quote this on the relevant invoice. All that is required is that there is evidence that the recipient belongs outside the UK. I understand that HMRC has announced that VATA 1994, Sch4A para 16 will be amended to bring the EU in line with the rest of the world (well, in VAT terms!)
  • There will be no significant change to, inter alia; land, admission to events, digital and telecoms services which have special rules and fall outside the general VAT rule. Digital services (MOSS) changes slightly and are considered here.

NB: UK businesses will still be required to apply the reverse charge to services received from the EU as these will be VAT free when purchased.

  • Reclaiming VAT incurred in the EU. Currently, a singe claim is submitted to HMRC for all VAT incurred in other Member States. This way of claiming will change post Brexit. A business will be required to submit a claim to each individual EU country in which it has suffered VAT. Broadly, this will be what is known as an EU Thirteenth Directive claim. These need to be done in the language of the relevant country and on specific forms. There will, inevitably be different rules for; deadlines, amounts claimable, methods of claim, information required and procedures. Experience insists that there will be a lot more red tape, rejections and hassle. Good luck!
  • For various reasons, it is likely that more UK businesses will be required to VAT register in the EU. This may be via legal requirements, or commercial planning. As an example, a UK business supplying, say, telecoms services, may be required to register in a country where the supply is consumed (the so-called use and enjoyment rules). Each country has its own rules and some may apply the reverse charge procedure, but businesses supplying:
    • telecommunications services
    • broadcasting services
    • electronically supplied services (for business customers)
    • hired goods
    • hired means of transport
    • insurance repair services

will need to check the requirements of each Member State to which it makes supplies. Also, businesses in the EU making such supplies in the UK are likely to be required to register here.

  • UK businesses suppling financial services (FS) to customers in the EU will benefit from the post Brexit changes. Currently FS providers to recipients outside the EU are able to recover attributable input tax. Similar services received in the UK and the rest of the EU are deemed to be exempt and there is no input tax recovery (for partial exemption see here), From 1 January 2021 as the UK will be a third country (third country refers to any country outside the EU, and in this case outside its economic structures – the single market and the customs union) so any FS supplied to EU recipients will qualify as “specified supplies” such that attributable input tax will be reclaimable. The legislation here: Value Added Tax (Input Tax) (Specified Supplies) (EU Exit) (No. 2) Regulations 2019. So, some rare good news. Full details of FS input recovery here and HMRC guidance here.
  • It is likely that a UK business which is required or chooses to VAT register in an EU Member State will need to appoint either a formal agent or a fiscal representative. This requirement varies between EU countries, so a business will need to check the rules in each country.  This will add complexity and costs. A fiscal representative is jointly liable for any VAT debts and penalties, so most entities acting as representatives will require a bank guarantee or similar to cover its exposure.
  • EU businesses supplying certain services in the UK. There may be an increased requirement for overseas businesses to VAT register in the UK, regardless of whether they have a place of belonging here. Any EU businesses in this position requiring advice please contact me.
  • TOMS. The Tour Operators’ Margin Scheme (details here) is an EU-wide arrangement which, broadly, simplifies VAT for tour operators. This is an area which remains uncertain. It is possible that the UK will negotiate a Brexit which does not disturb TOMS (increasingly unlikely I would say). But in a no-deal Brexit the government has announced that UK tour operators can continue to apply TOMS to UK holidays. However, supplies of holidays outside the UK will not be subject to VAT. This will put UK tour operators at an apparent advantage compared to EU competitors. However, it is likely that they will soon be required to VAT register in every EU country in which it sells holidays. Watch this space.

Commentary

A mixed bag of changes to businesses supplying services. It is crucial for all suppliers of services to the EU to review their position and put plans in action sooner rather than later. If you, or your clients, are unsure about these changes, or would like specific advice, please contact me. I can also offer a review of a business to advise on what planning is required, or beneficial. It is important to get this right as there could be significant penalties, back tax and other unwanted outcomes.

VAT – Input tax claims. Latest from the courts

By   1 June 2020
0

Latest from the courts

In the recent First Tier Tribunal (FTT) case of Aitmatov Academy an otherwise unremarkable case illustrates the care required when making input tax claims.

The quantum of the claim was low and the technical issues not particularly complex, however, it underlined some basic rules for making a VAT claim.

Background

A doctor organised a cultural event at the House of Lords for which no charge was made to attendees. The event organiser as shown on the event form was the doctor. Aitmatov Academy was shown as an organisation associated with the event.  It was agreed that the attendees were not potential customers of Aitmatov Academy and that the overall purpose of the event was cultural and not advertising.

Issues

 HMRC disallowed the claim. The issues were:

  • HMRC contended that the expenses were not incurred by the taxpayer but by the doctor personally (the doctor was not VAT registered)
  • that if the VAT was incurred by the Academy, it was not directly attributed to a taxable supply
  • that if the VAT was directly attributed to a taxable supply, it was business entertaining, on which input tax is blocked

Decision

The FTT found that the Academy incurred the cost and consequently must have concluded that the Academy was the recipient of the supply, not the doctor.

However, the judge decided that the awards ceremony was not directly or indirectly linked to taxable supplies made or intended to be made by the Academy, and therefore that the referable input tax should not be allowed. Consequently, the court did not need to consider whether the event qualified as business entertainment.

On a separate point, the appellant contended that, as a similar claim had been paid by HMRC previously, she could not see the difference that caused input VAT in this case to be disallowed. The Tribunal explained that its role is to apply the law in this specific instance and as such it cannot look at what happened in an early case which is not the subject of an appeal.

Commentary

A helpful reminder of some of the tests that need to be passed in order for an input tax claim to be valid. I have written about some common issues with claims and provided a checklist. Broadly, in addition to the tests in this case, a business needs to consider:

  • whether there was actually a supply
  • is the documentation correct?
  • time limits
  • the VAT liability of the supply
  • the place of supply
  • partial exemption
  • non-business activity – particularly charity and NFP bodies
  • if the claim is specifically blocked (eg; cars, and certain schemes)

I have also looked at which input tax is specifically barred.

Finally, “entertainment” is a topic all of its own. I have considered what is claimable here in article which includes a useful flowchart.

As always, the message is; if a business is to avoid penalties and interest, if there is any doubt over the validity of a claim, seek advice!







VAT: Where do I belong?

By   7 May 2020
0

The place of belonging

The concept of “belonging” is very important in VAT as it determines where a supply takes place and thus the rate applicable and the country in which is due. (The so-called “Place Of Supply, or POS). It is necessary, for most supplies, to establish where both the supplier, and the recipient belongs. Because this is a complex area of VAT it is not difficult to be overpaying tax in one country, not paying tax where it is properly due, or missing the tax issue completely.

A relevant business person `belongs’ in the relevant country. A `relevant country’ means:

  • the country in which the person has a business establishment, or some other fixed establishment (if it has none in any other country);
  • if the person has a business establishment, or some other fixed establishment or establishments, in more than one country, the country of the relevant establishment (ie; the establishment most directly concerned with the supply); and
  • otherwise, the country of the person’s usual place of residence (in the case of a body corporate, where it is legally constituted)

A person who is not a relevant business person `belongs’ in the country of his usual place of residence. The `belonging’ definition applies equally to a supplier and the recipient of a supply, where relevant.

Business establishment is not defined in the legislation but is taken by HMRC to mean the principal place of business. It is usually the head office, headquarters or ‘seat’ from which the business is run. There can only be one such place and it may take the form of an office, showroom or factory.

Fixed establishment is also not defined in the legislation but is taken by HMRC to mean an establishment (other than the business establishment) which has both the technical and human resources necessary for providing and receiving services on a permanent basis. A business may therefore have several fixed establishments, including a branch of the business or an agency. A temporary presence of human and technical resources does not create a fixed establishment in the UK.

Usual place of residence. A body corporate has its usual place of residence where it is legally constituted. The usual place of residence of an individual is not defined in the legislation. HMRC interpret the phrase according to the ordinary usage of the words, ie; normally the country where the individual has set up home with his/her family and is in full-time employment. An individual is not resident in a country if only visiting as a tourist.

More than one establishment. Where the supplier/recipient has establishments in more than one country, the supplies made from/received at each establishment must be considered separately. For each supply of services, the establishment which is actually providing/receiving the services is normally the one most directly connected with the supply but all facts should be considered including

  • for suppliers, from which establishment the services are actually provided
  • for recipients; at which establishment the services are actually consumed, effectively used or enjoyed
  • which establishment appears on the contracts, correspondence and invoices
  • where directors or others who entered into the contract are permanently based, and
  • at which establishment decisions are taken and controls are exercised over the performance of the contract

However, where an establishment is actually providing/receiving the supply of services, it is normally that establishment which is most directly connected with the supply, even if the contractual position is different.

VAT groups

A VAT group is treated as a single entity. This also applies when applying the ‘place of belonging’. As a result, a group has establishments wherever any member of the group has establishments.

This is an area which often leads to uncertainty, and therefore VAT issues.  It is also an area where VAT planning may; save time, resources and avoid unexpected VAT costs, either in the UK or another country.

For more on our International Services







VAT: Zero rated books? The Thorstein Gardarsson UT case

By   14 April 2020
0

Latest from the courts

In The Thorstein Gardarsson T/A Action Day A Islandi Upper Tribunal (UT) case the issue was whether supplies of an “Action Day Planner” (ADP) were zero-rated as supplies of a book.

Legislation

The VAT Act 1994, Schedule 8, Group 3, item 1 zero rates – “Books, booklets, brochures, pamphlets and leaflets.”  The words in Group 3 are used in their ordinary, everyday sense.

Background

The Appellants (HMRC) appealed against a decision of the First Tier Tribunal (FTT) which determined that the ADP is a “book” with the result that supplies of it made by Thorstein Gardarsson (TG) were zero-rated for VAT purposes. TG belonged outside the EU but sold its products B2C via the Amazon platform to consumers in the UK.

HMRC argued that the ADP was properly to be considered a ‘diary’ and thereby stationery which is standard rated. Predictably, TG asserted that the ADP is not a diary and despite it having space in which the ‘student’ seeking to master skills of time management may enter information, doing so is merely part of the learning taught through the narrative sections of the book.

The FTT allowed TG’s earlier appeal and considered the judgment of the High Court in Colour Offset Ltd. [1995] BVC 31 to be binding. The FTT concluded that the main function of the ADP is to teach the user how to better or more effectively manage time. The writing space was no different from a student filling out answers to practice papers or someone completing a crossword puzzle. The ADP was therefore a book and zero rated.

Appeal

In this UT case HMRC appealed the FTT decision on the grounds that whilst Colour Offset was binding on the FTT, it failed to:

  • identify the correct test set out in Colour Offset
  • apply the test correctly to the facts it had found

The Product

The external appearance if the ADP is that of a black leather covered book. It had an elastic strap attached to the inside of the back cover that can be wrapped around the front to hold it closed. Inside it has 115 pages. The ADP is described as a time management tool developed to “help people to grow; to teach and instruct people time management skills”. The first 16 pages contain text setting out a narrative of the ethos articulated by the appellant for effective time management. The remainder of the ADP is taken up with 52 double page planners. At the back is a cardboard slip pocket.

Decision

The UT noted that the FTT had quoted from VAT Notice 701/10 and this had led the FTT into error. In the Notice ‘crossword books, exam study guides etc.’ are considered books although the statutory provisions do not mention these at all. The Notice only records HMRC’s practice in this regard and does not have force of law. However, the FTT concluded that because crossword books and exam study guides are referred to as books, it should follow that any item with the necessary physical characteristics ‘which has as its main function informing/educating or recreational enjoyment’ is also a book. The tests in Colour Offset do not refer at all to whether the main function of an item is to inform or educate; nor does it refer to recreational enjoyment.

The UT considered that the FTT approached its task by applying a test that was different from that articulated in Colour Offset and this had the ability to produce a different outcome from the correct test. In doing so, he FTT made an error of law. It also concluded that the ADP is not a book as its main function is to be written in (as distinct from being read or looked at) and that the comparison to crossword puzzles or revision guides is irrelevant. Therefore, ADPs were standard rated and output tax was due on the sale of them.

HMRC’s appeal was allowed, the FTT decision is set aside and directed the matter back to the FTT for reconsideration. It was directed that the FTT makes a decision predicated on the basis that the ADP is not a book.

Commentary

The zero rating of printed matter has long been a moot point in VAT and the amount of detail that the guidance goes into demonstrates this. It should be noted that HMRC guidance set out in Public Notice 701/10 is purely that, and does not have the force of law. This logic extends to all HMRC published guidance unless the narrative specifically states that it has the force of law. A lot of the guidance is based on case law, but certain definitions are unhelpful.

Even the FTT can get it wrong and apply the wrong tests, so if you or your clients have any doubts about the VAT liabilities of supplies made, it is worthwhile having these reviewed by a specialist.







VAT: Crowdfunding – What is taxable?

By   9 April 2020
0

What is crowdfunding?

Crowdfunding is the practice of funding a project or venture by raising many small amounts of money from a large number of people, typically via the internet on specifically designed platforms and is an alternative to traditional ways of raising finance. The model is usually based on three parties: the project initiator who proposes the idea or project to be funded, individuals or groups who support the idea, and a moderating organisation (the “platform”) that brings the parties together to launch the idea.

VAT Treatment

The VAT treatment of supplies that might potentially be made is no different to similar financing arrangements, for example; sponsorship, donations and investments made through more traditional routes. Whether a recipient of crowdfunding is liable to charge and pay VAT depends on the facts in each case.

Examples

Donations

  • where nothing is given in return for the funding, it will be treated as a donation and not liable to VAT – the position is the same where all that the funder receives is a bare acknowledgement, such as a mention in a programme or something similar

Goods and/or services

  • where the funder receives goods or services that have a real value associated with them, for example; clothing, tickets, DVDs, film viewings, output tax will be due

Combination

  • where the payment is for a combination of the two examples above, if it is clear that the donation element is optional then that part of the sponsorship can be treated as a non-taxable donation and the supply will be taxable. If a donation element cannot be carved out, it is likely that all of the payment will be considered as VATable

Investment

  • where the funding takes the form of an investment where the funder is entitled to a financial return such as; interest, dividends or profit share, any payment due to the funder is unlikely to be liable to output tax, The reason why most of these arrangements are outside the scope of VAT is that the provision of capital in a business venture is not seen as a supply for VAT purposes

Royalties

  • if the arrangement is that the funder receives royalties based on a supply of intellectual property or some other similar benefit the payment is likely to be consideration for a taxable supply and output tax will be due

VAT registration 

If income from the sources above which are deemed to be subject to VAT exceeds the VAT registration limit (currently £85,000 in any twelve-month period) the person, in whichever legal identity, such as; individual, company, partnership, Trust etc will be liable to register for VAT. If income is below this limit, it will be possible, but not mandatory to VAT register. The benefits of voluntary registration here.

Input tax recovery

If VAT registered, any input tax incurred on costs relating to crowdfunding is usually recoverable (see here for exceptions). However, if the costs relate to donations or some types of investment then input tax claims are specifically blocked as they would relate to non-business activities.

Commentary

There can be difficulties in establishing the tax liability of crowdfunding and in a broader sense “sponsorship” in general. However, experience insists that the biggest issue is initially identifying that there may be a VAT issue at all. If you, or your clients are involved in crowdfunding, or have sponsors, it would be prudent to review the VAT treatment of the activities.







VAT: MTD Phase 2 deferred due to coronavirus

By   1 April 2020
0

HMRC has announced that the second phase of Making Tax Digital (MTD) for VAT, due to be introduced on 1 April 2020 has been postponed by one year until 1 April 2021.

Now, VAT registered businesses will need to be compliant from its first VAT return period starting on or after 1 April 2021.

What is MTD Phase 2?

These are key elements to Phase 2:

  • rigorous rules will be introduced to ensure the accurate application of digital records and the way in which businesses upload their returns (digital bookkeeping)
  • there must be a full end-to-end digital journey in place from the capturing of transactions to the submission of the VAT return. Transfer of data between functional compatible software, eg; invoice and accounting systems etc. must be done using digital links (digital journey). This is the end of the “cut and paste: concession allowed with the soft-landing of Phase 1
  • the most basic accounting software is unlikely to have the required features to provide a way to submit the financial records on transactions meaning they are likely to lose accreditation
  • penalties for non-compliance will be introduced (on a cumulative basis, based on the number up to 15% of VAT due)

The overall aim is to eliminate human intervention into systems, thus reducing, it is hoped, errors.

Deferral

HMRC have stated that as a consequence of the coronavirus it understands the difficulty businesses are experiencing and is committed to helping “in every way possible” those facing unprecedented challenges.

HMRC is therefore giving around 1.3 million UK VAT registered businesses more time to put in place digital links between all parts of their functional compatible software.

Comment

A welcome announcement, and one which will be appreciated, especially by the more complex, medium to larger businesses who are required to juggle with multiple accounting systems, group accounts and considerable consolidation. The deferral may also be as a result of HMRC’s staff being stretched at the current time.







A Round-Up of three new EU VAT measures

By   24 February 2020
0

With the end of the Brexit transition period looming, the EU have announced new measures:

e-commerce VAT fraud

The first measure is the European Commission (EC) approving (this month) new measures to transmit and exchange payment data in order to fight e-commerce VAT fraud. Member States will be assisted in their fight against e-commerce VAT fraud by the launch of a Central Electronic System of Payment (CESOP) information arrangement.

CESOP will keep records of cross-border payment information within the EU, as well as payments to third countries or territories, for a period of five years. This will allow tax authorities to properly control the correct fulfilment of VAT obligations on cross-border Business to Consumer (B2C) supplies of goods and services.

The measures will be implemented on 1 January 2025. 

Simplified rules for small businesses

The EC has also recently adopted simplified VAT rules applicable to small businesses. The new measures are intended to reduce the administrative burden and compliance costs for small enterprises and create a fiscal environment which will help small enterprises grow and trade across borders more efficiently.

The measures foresee that small enterprises will be able to qualify for simplified VAT compliance rules where their annual turnover remains below a threshold set by a Member State concerned, which cannot be higher than 85 000 EUR. Under certain conditions, small enterprises from other member states, which do not exceed this threshold, will also be able to benefit from the simplified scheme, if their total annual turnover in the whole of the EU does not exceed 100 000 EUR.

The new rules will apply as of 1 January 2025.

New rules for exchange of VAT payment data

In addition to the anti e-commerce fraud proposals above, new measures will enable Member States to collect, in a harmonised way, the records made electronically available by payment service providers, such as banks. These complement the VAT regulatory framework for e-commerce coming into force in January 2021 which introduced new VAT obligations for online marketplaces and simplified VAT compliance rules for online businesses.

The new measures will apply as of 1 January 2024.

How these new incentives affect UK businesses remains to be seen as our future trading relationship with the EU is, to put it diplomatically, unclear.