New rules from 1 January 2021.
GOV.UK has published new guidance from the Department for International Trade.
The guidance sets out what a business will need to do 1 January 2021. It will be updated if anything changes.
It covers:
Exporting to and importing from the EU
Exporting to and importing from non-EU countries
All business with goods crossing the new border will need to understand and prepare for the changes.
In the current climate many businesses are struggling to make payments to HMRC. This clearly can have serious consequences and reduced income due to the Covid 19 coronavirus adds more problems.
This article looks at how to manage a VAT debt position; what can be done, and what not to do.
The first, and most important point to make is; do not ignore a tax debt. It will not go away and, in VAT there is, in most cases a four-year limit for assessing tax, but once assessed or declared, there is no time bar for collecting the debt.
HMRC look for a taxpayer to be taking steps to make a payment, or for a disclosure of the reason funds are unavailable. If HMRC’s Debt Management & Banking team have no idea of the cause of non-payment they will assume that the matter is being ignored and the full force of their powers are likely to be invoked. For background on HMRC’s VAT recovery procedures and powers see here. It is no surprise to learn that the extent of their powers is sweeping and formidable.
Is the VAT debt correct?
The first step is to establish whether a VAT debt is accurate. If it is a result of a normal return, then ensure the declaration is correct. If it is the result of an assessment by HMRC, always challenge it. In the majority of cases, we can assist with getting an assessment reduced or removed completely. A debt may be made up of a combination of; actual VAT, surcharges, penalties and interest
Time To Pay (TTP)
Such an arrangement with HMRC enables a debt to be spread over a period of time. This is usually, but not always, the most beneficial course of action. The process is that the taxpayer submits a proposal for settling the debt over a set period (a “best offer”) in instalments. HMRC may accept the offer, refuse it outright or make a “counter-offer”.
Matters to consider when submitting a VAT TTP proposal:
What HMRC expect
HMRC look for various ways a business can raise funds to pay a VAT debt, these include:
The Debt Management & Banking staff have experience and knowledge of these methods and also use credit agencies.
Summary
It is always important to talk to HMRC. An ongoing dialogue can improve the debt situation and avoid HMRC taking unilateral action – which is nearly always detrimental to a business. Check that the debt is correct. Consider a TTP arrangement or alternative ways to raise funds. Talk to your advisers.
A debt is often the result of an assessment and penalties. A look at penalties (and how to avoid them) here and an article on how to survive HMRC’s enforcement powers here.
VAT Basics
The majority of input tax incurred by most VAT registered businesses may be recovered. However, there is some input tax that may not be. I thought it would be helpful if I pulled together all of these categories in one place:
Blocked VAT Claims
A brief overview
In most cases this evidence will be an invoice (or as the rules state “a proper tax invoice)” although it may be import, self-billing or other documentation in specific circumstances. A claim is invalid without the correct paperwork. HMRC may accept alternative evidence, however, they are not duty bound to do so (and rarely do). So ensure that you always obtain and retain the correct documentation.
Usually this is an invalid invoice, or using a delivery note/statement/pro forma in place of a proper tax invoice. To support a claim an invoice must show all the information set out in the legislation. HMRC are within their rights to disallow a claim if any of the details are missing. A full guide is here.
Broadly speaking, if a business incurs VAT in respect of exempt supplies it cannot recover it. If a business makes only exempt supplies it cannot even register for VAT. There is a certain easement called de minimis which provide for recovery if the input tax is below certain prescribed limits. Input tax which relates to both exempt and taxable activities must be apportioned. More details of partial exemption may be found here.
If a charity or NFP entity incurs input tax in connection with non-business activities this cannot be recovered and there is no de minimis relief. Input tax which relates to both business and non-business activities must be apportioned. Business versus non-business apportionment must be carried out first and then any partial exemption calculation for the business element if appropriate. More details here.
If input tax is not reclaimed within four years of it being incurred, the capping provisions apply and any claim will be rejected by HMRC.
This is always irrecoverable unless the client or customer being entertained belongs overseas. The input tax incurred on staff entertainment costs is however recoverable.
In most cases the VAT incurred on the purchase of a car is blocked. The only exceptions are for when the car; is part of the stock in trade of a motor manufacturer or dealer, or is used primarily for the purposes of taxi hire; self-drive hire or driving instruction; or is used exclusively for a business purpose and is not made available for private use. This last category is notoriously difficult to prove to HMRC and the evidence to support this must be very good.
If a business leases a car for business purposes it will normally be unable to recover 50% of the VAT charged. The 50% block is to cover the private use of the car.
For instance, a business using the Flat Rate Scheme cannot recover input tax except for certain large capital purchases, also there are certain blocks for recovery on TOMS users
Even if you obtain an invoice purporting to show a VAT amount, this cannot be recovered if the VAT was charged in error; either completely inappropriately or at the wrong rate. A business’ recourse is with the supplier and not HMRC.
Even if a business has an invoice addressed to it and the services or goods are paid for by the business, the input tax on the purchase is blocked if the supply is not for business use. This may be because the purchase is for personal use, or by anther business or for purposes not related to the business.
This is not input tax and therefore is not claimable. However, there are exceptions for goods on hand at registration and services received within six months of registration if certain conditions are met.
Input tax incurred on certain articles that are installed in buildings which are sold or leased at the zero rate is blocked. Details here.
Goods sold to you under one of the VAT second-hand schemes will not show a separate VAT charge and no input tax is recoverable on these goods.
Assets of a business transferred to you as a going concern are not deemed to be a supply for VAT purposes and consequently, there is no VAT chargeable and therefore no input tax to recover.
A business cannot reclaim VAT when it pays for goods or services to be supplied directly to its client. However, in this situation the VAT may be claimable by the client if they are VAT registered. For more on disbursements see here.
A business cannot reclaim VAT charged on goods or services that it has bought from suppliers in other EU States. Only UK VAT may be claimed on a UK VAT return. There is however, a mechanism available to claim this VAT back from the relevant VAT body in those States. However, in most cases, supplies received from overseas suppliers are VAT free, so it is usually worth checking whether any VAT has been charged correctly.
Input tax incurred on expenditure is one of the most complex areas of VAT. It also represents the biggest VAT cost to a business if VAT falls to be irrecoverable. It is almost always worthwhile reviewing what VAT is being reclaimed. Claim too much and there could well be penalties and interest, and of course, if a business is not claiming as much input tax as it could, this represents a straightforward cost.
The European Commission has published the various VAT rates applied to different types of supply in all Member States (and the UK!) here.
This is a helpful and detailed document that also shows historic VAT rates.
As we know, the UK will leave the EU on 1 January 2021. A lot of articles have, understandably, focussed on the movement of goods between the UK and the EU, however, there will be significant changes for suppliers and consumers of services. Some of these will be beneficial, and some, charitably, will be a royal pain.
In this article I have tried to summarise the most important changes. Compared to supplies of goods, the changes to services are more certain, so businesses can make preparations with more confidence.
The changes to services
NB: UK businesses will still be required to apply the reverse charge to services received from the EU as these will be VAT free when purchased.
will need to check the requirements of each Member State to which it makes supplies. Also, businesses in the EU making such supplies in the UK are likely to be required to register here.
Commentary
A mixed bag of changes to businesses supplying services. It is crucial for all suppliers of services to the EU to review their position and put plans in action sooner rather than later. If you, or your clients, are unsure about these changes, or would like specific advice, please contact me. I can also offer a review of a business to advise on what planning is required, or beneficial. It is important to get this right as there could be significant penalties, back tax and other unwanted outcomes.
Latest from the courts.
In the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) case of Netbusters (UK) Limited the issue was whether the supply was the standard rated provision of sporting facilities, or an exempt right over land.
Background
Netbusters organised football and netball leagues and provided the playing facilities (artificial pitches for football and courts for netball). The hire of the facilities was for a defined period of time and no other party had the right to access the pitches during those times. The hire could be a block, or one-off booking. The appellant contended that the supplies were exempt via VAT Act 1994, Sch 9, Group 1 – “The grant of any interest in or right over land or of any licence to occupy land…” However, item 1 Note (para m) excludes the “the grant of facilities for playing any sport or participating in any physical recreation” in which case they become standard rated. To add complexity, Note 16 overrides the exception for sporting facilities (so they are exempt) if the grant of the facilities is for:
“(a) a continuous period of use exceeding 24 hours; or
(b) a series of 10 or more periods, whether or not exceeding 24 hours in total, where the following conditions are satisfied—
(i) each period is in respect of the same activity carried on at the same place;
(ii) the interval between each period is not less than one day and not more than 14 days;
(iii) consideration is payable by reference to the whole series and is evidenced by written agreement;
(iv) the grantee has exclusive use of the facilities; and
(v) the grantee is a school, a club, an association or an organisation representing affiliated clubs or constituent associations.”
I have a simplified flowchart which may assist if you, or your clients, need to look at these types of supplies further.
Another issue was whether Netbusters’ league/tournament management services which were, in principle, available independently of pitch hire, but in practice rarely were provided in that way, were separate supplies or composite. There was a single price payable for both pitch hire and league management services.
The appellant contended that its supplies were exempt via VAT Act 1994, Sch 9, Group 1 or that Revenue and Customs Brief 8 (2014): sports leagues, is applicable which states “HMRC accepts that the decision of the FTT is applicable to all traders who operate in circumstances akin to Goals Soccer Centres plc. This includes traders who hire the pitches from third parties such as local authorities, schools and clubs…”
HMRC argued that there was no intention to create a tenancy and the agreements between the parties did not provide for exclusive use of the premises, so the supplies fell to be standard rated.
Decision
The appeal was allowed; the supply was a singe exempt supply because the objective character of the supplies were properly categorised as the granting of interests in, rights over or licenses to occupy land. It was found to be significant Netbusters (or its customers) had the ability to exclude others from the pitches during the period of the matches.
It was therefore unnecessary to consider whether Netbusters’ supplies grants of facilities satisfy all the conditions set out in Note 16 (although the FTT were disinclined to do this anyway as a consequence of the way respondent prepared its case).
Commentary
The issue of the nature sporting rights has a long and acrimonious history both in the UK and EU courts. Any business providing similar services are advised to review the VAT treatment applied.
HMRC has published information on Tariffs.
You can use this service to check the UK Global Tariff that will apply to goods imported post-Brexit. It also shows the difference between what you pay now and what you’ll pay from 1 January 2021.
The UK Global Tariff will apply to all goods imported from 1 January 2021 – which will include bringing in goods from EU Member States. (currently acquisitions, not imports).
Latest from the courts
In the University Of Southampton Students’ Union (USSU) First Tier Tribunal (FTT) case the issue was the VAT treatment of supplies of hot food and coffee; whether the appellant was an eligible institution making principal supplies of education or vocational training and/or whether supplies of hot food and coffee closely related to such principal supplies.
Background
USSU argued that both the supply of hot food and coffee by the USSU shop are exempt via The VAT Act 1994 Schedule 9, group 6, Item 4(a) and note 1(e) as supplies made by an eligible body which makes principal supplies of vocational training, and which are closely related to the (exempt) principal supply of education by the University of Southampton or vocational training by USSU. In the alternative, exemption applies for matters closely related to supplies of education by a third party via a published HMRC concession (and its supplies were within HMRC’s conditions for such a concession).
HMRC disagreed and claimed that these supplies were not closely related to education and that USSU was not an eligible body (no ring fencing of the profits such that they were not necessarily reinvested in its own supplies of education). Therefore, the supplies were properly taxable, and they declined to pay the appellant’s claim of overpaid output tax. The respondent also cited the Loughborough Students’ UnionUpper Tribunal (UT) case.
Decision
The appeal was dismissed for the following reasons:
Commentary
Superficially, the claim seemed good. Para 5.5 of PN 709/1 states: “If you’re a student union and you’re supplying catering (including hot takeaway food) to students both on behalf, and with the agreement, of the parent institution, as a concession you can treat your supplies in the same way as the parent institution itself. This means that you can treat your supplies as exempt when made by unions at universities.. This means that most supplies of food and drink made by the union, where the food is sold for consumption in the course of catering will be exempt… For example, food and drink sold from canteens, refectories and other catering outlets (excluding bars), plus food and drink sold from vending machines situated in canteens and similar areas.”
However, the Notice then goes on to add “But it does not cover food and drink sold from campus shops, bars, tuck shops, other similar outlets and certain vending machines…”
This appeal looks a close-run thing, but it demonstrates that small differences in detail can produce different VAT outcomes. We urge all Student Unions and other entities “attached” to education providers to review their position.
HMRC has published guidance on a number of issues relating to duty and guarantee waivers:
We recommend any business importing goods checks all the requirements and puts plans in place to defer VAT, duties and customs payments wherever possible. Despite political promises, this significant additional red tape as a result of Brexit helps nobody and will be a costly burden. However, at least the government have put a structure in place which will aid cashflow.
Latest from the courts.
The rolls used in Subway’s hot sandwiches are not bread. According to a recent ruling by Ireland’s Supreme Court, because of the high level of sugar in the rolls, they cannot be taxed as bread, so the VAT zero rate cannot apply.